Evaluation of the efficacy and usability of NCI’s Facing Forward booklet in the cancer community setting
- 291 Downloads
The NCI developed the print-based educational brochure, Facing Forward, to fill a gap in helping cancer patients meet the challenges of transitioning from active treatment to survivorship; however, little research has been conducted on its efficacy.
The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of Facing Forward in promoting the uptake of recommended behaviors (e.g., ways to manage physical changes) and to explore its usability.
At the last treatment appointment, early-stage breast, prostate, colorectal, and thoracic cancer patients (N = 340) recruited from community clinical oncology practices and an academic medical center completed a baseline assessment and were randomized to receive either Facing Forward (n = 175) or an attention control booklet about the NCI’s Cancer Information Service (n = 165). Patients completed follow-up assessments at 8 weeks and 6 months post-baseline.
The reported uptake of recommended stress management behaviors was greater among intervention than control participants at both 8 weeks post-baseline (p = 0.016) and 6 months post-baseline (p = 0.017). At 8 weeks post-baseline, the intervention control group difference was greater among African-American than Caucasian participants (p < 0.03) and significant only among the former (p < 0.003); attendance at a cancer support group was also greater among the intervention than control group participants (p < 0.02). There were no significant intervention control group differences in the reported uptake of recommended behaviors in three other categories (p > 0.025). Intervention participants rated Facing Forward as understandable and helpful and indicated a high level of intention to try the behaviors recommended.
Facing Forward can enhance early-stage survivors’ reported ability to manage stress and increase support group use during the reentry period.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Facing Forward can help survivors meet the challenges of the reentry period.
KeywordsSurvivorship Cancer control Psychosocial interventions Facing Forward
This work was supported in part by National Institute of Health grants R01 CA104979, 5P01 CA057586, and the Fox Chase Cancer Center Behavioral Research Core Facility P30 CA06927, as well as Department of Defense grants DAMD 17-01-01-1-0238 and DAMD 17-02-1-0382 and the LAF PT07-07020 grant. We are indebted to Mary Anne Ryan for her technical assistance.
- 3.ACS. Cancer treatment and survivorship: facts & figures 2012–2013; 2012. Atlanta.Google Scholar
- 4.Society AC. Cancer facts and figures 2012; 2012.Google Scholar
- 5.Miller SM, Bowen DJ, Croyle RT, Rowland J, editors. Handbook of cancer control and behavioral science: a resource for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2009.Google Scholar
- 6.Mullan, F. Re-entry: the educational needs of the cancer survivor. Health Education Quarterly 1984; 10 (Supplement):88–94.Google Scholar
- 8.Adler NE, Page AEK, editors. Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2008.Google Scholar
- 11.Hewitt M, Sheldon Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Committee on Cancer Survivorship: improving care and quality of life. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine and National Research Council; 2006.Google Scholar
- 17.Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, editors. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006. p. 536.Google Scholar
- 27.N.E. Adler, A.E.K Page, editors. Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs; 2008, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- 30.Casillas J, Ganz PA. Physical late effects of cancer. In: Miller SM et al., editors. Handbook of cancer control and behavioral science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2009. p. 431–48.Google Scholar
- 34.Institute of Medicine. Facing forward: life after cancer treatment. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2006.Google Scholar
- 35.NCI’s Cancer Information Service (CIS) (2010) What is the NCI's cancer information service?Google Scholar
- 38.Shaffer JP. Multiple hypothesis testing. Annual Review of Psychology, 1995;46:561–84.Google Scholar
- 42.Miller SM, Bowen D J, Croyle RT, Rowland, J, (ed). Handbook of cancer control and behavioral science: a resource for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2009.Google Scholar
- 44.Bisson J, Andrew M. Psychological treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database System Review. 2007;3:1–99.Google Scholar
- 46.Miller SM, Bowen DJ, Cfroyle RT, Rowland JH, editors. Cancer control and behavioral science: a resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2008.Google Scholar
- 47.Fogel J, Ribisl KM, Morgan PD, Humphreys K, Lyons EJ. Underrepresentation of African Americans in online cancer support groups. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008;100(6):705–12.Google Scholar
- 50.Thompson VLS, Cacazos-Rehg P, Tate KY, Gaier A. Cancer information seeking among African Americans, Journal of Cancer Education. 2008;23:92–101.Google Scholar