A controlled study of risk factors for disease and current problems in long-term testicular cancer survivors
To compare risk factors for disease and current problems in long-term testicular cancer survivors (TCSs) and age-matched population-based controls (NORMs).
The study was cross-sectional and concerned 1,291 Norwegian TCSs followed up after a mean of 11 years, and 6,455 NORMs. Both TCSs and NORMs completed questionnaires and had a clinical examination. Indices for risk factors and current problems were calculated. Outcome measures were: visits to general practitioners last year, poor self-rated health, and poor quality of life (QoL).
The mean risk score was significantly lower and the mean current problem score significantly higher in TCSs compared to NORMs without reaching clinical significance. The risk for future fatal cardiac events did not differ between the groups. TCSs had a higher risk for visiting a general practitioner than NORMs (OR 3.58, 95% CI 3.09–4.15), while no significant difference was observed for self-rated health. Poor QoL in TCSs was significantly associated with more current problems than risk factors. Previous treatment for mental problems, presence of severe somatic disease and musculo-skeletal problems were significantly associated with all three outcome measures. Musculo-skeletal problems were most strongly associated with visits to general practitioners among TCSs.
Several risk factors for preventive clinical interventions and current problems that eventually should be treated were identified in TCSs.
Implications for cancer survivors
TCSs show several risk factors and current problems that are relevant for visits to general practitioners, poorer self-rated health, and poorer QoL. These should get attention from health personnel caring for TCSs.
KeywordsTesticular cancer Cancer survivor Risk factor Quality of life
- 10.Wallace RB. Maxcy-Rosenau-Last Public health and preventive medicine. 15th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2007.Google Scholar
- 11.Brisette I, Cohen S, Seeman TE. Measuring social integration and social networks. In: Cohen S, Underwood LG, Gottlieb BH, editors. Social support: measurement and intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 53–85.Google Scholar
- 13.Holmen J, Midthjell K, Krüger Ø, Langhammer A, Holmen TL, Bratberg GH, et al. The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 1995–97 (HUNT 2): objectives, contents, methods and participation. Nor Epidemiol. 2003;13:19–32.Google Scholar
- 16.Thorsen L, Nystad W, Stigum H, Dahl O, Klepp O, Bremnes RM, et al. The association between self-reported physical activity and prevalence of depression and anxiety in long-term survivors of testicular cancer and in general population sample. Support Care Cancer. 2005;13:637–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1965.Google Scholar
- 23.Ware Jr JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36® Health Survey: manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln: QualityMetric Inc; 2000.Google Scholar
- 24.Ware Jr JE, Gandek B, Kosinski M, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Brazier J, et al. The equivalence of SF-36 health score estimates using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1167–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oakes: SAGE; 2001.Google Scholar
- 27.Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Earlbaum; 1988.Google Scholar
- 30.Cramp F, Danile J. Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;16:CD006145.Google Scholar
- 32.Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient—reported outcomes. 2nd ed. Chicester: Wiley; 2007.Google Scholar