Journal of Cancer Survivorship

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 159–166

Views of primary care physicians and oncologists on cancer follow-up initiatives in primary care: an online survey

  • Eila K. Watson
  • Elaine M. Sugden
  • Peter W. Rose
Article

Abstract

Introduction

Primary care physicians (PCPs) are playing an increasing role in the follow-up of cancer in England. In 2003 a Cancer Care Review (CCR) was introduced to ensure contact between PCPs and cancer patients within 6 months of diagnosis. The NHS also intends to introduce survivorship care plans (SCP). The aims of this study were to: describe current practice and views in primary care with respect to the CCR and information provision from secondary to primary care following final discharge from hospital follow-up; and to seek views on the perceived usefulness, content, and feasibility of a SCP.

Methods

An on-line questionnaire survey of 100 oncologists and 200 PCPs.

Results

Half of PCPs undertook the CCR opportunistically, and only 64% had an agreed structure. Forty percent felt the CCR was useful for the doctor, and 60% useful for the patient. Most PCPs and oncologists think a SCP would be useful, but only 40% oncologists thought that it would be easy to produce. At discharge from follow-up, more than half of oncologists said they provided information on histology, treatment, requirements for screening and surveillance, and referral guidance. Less than half provide information on potential late effects and symptoms of recurrence. PCPs felt that information on all of these areas was important and that the information they receive is often inadequate.

Discussion/Conclusions

The CCR has not been implemented systematically. There is support for the introduction of a SCP and broad agreement on content. However, careful planning is needed to ensure all necessary information is included and to overcome barriers of implementation.

Implications for cancer survivors

Further research should explore what cancer survivors would find useful in a primary care-based CCR and what should be included in a SCP. This should be clearly communicated to the relevant health care professionals to maximise the benefits cancer survivors and their families gain from these policy initiatives.

Keywords

Primary care physicians Oncologists Survivorship care plans Cancer care Survey 

References

  1. 1.
    Lewis RA, Neal RD, Williams NH, France B, Hendry M, Russell D, et al. Follow-up of cancer in primary care versus secondary care: systematic review. BJGP. 2009;59:243–7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beaver K, Tysver-Robinson D, Campbell M, Twomey M, Williamson S, Hindley A, et al. Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial. BMJ. 2009;338:a3147. doi:10.1136/bmj.a3147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Early and locally advanced breast cancer: diagnosis and treatment. Cardiff National Collaborating Centre for Cancer. 2009.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. Cardiff: National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2008.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lewis RA, Neal RD, Hendry M, France B, Williams NH, Russell D, et al. Patients’ and health care professionals’ views of cancer follow up: a systematic review. BJGP. 2009;59:248–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Brien R, Rose P, Campbell C, Weller D, McIntosh H, Neal RD, et al. on behalf of the Prostate Cancer Follow-up Group. “I wish I’d told them”: a qualitative study examining the unmet psychosocial needs of prostate cancer patients and their partners after treatment. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The new general Medical Services Contract: Investing in General Practice. http://www.nhsemployers.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/gms_contract_cd_130209.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2009.
  8. 8.
    Department of Health. Cancer Reform Strategy. 2007. London. http://www.macmillan.org.uk/Documents/Support_Material/About_us/Health_professionals/primarycareupdates/jun08.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2009.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E (eds) From Cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC, Committee on Cancer Survivorship, Improving Care and Quality of Life, NationalCancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council, National Academies Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Profile of UK General Practitioners 2006. Information Sheet. Royal College of General Practitioners, London. http://www.rcgp.org.uk/InformationSheets.
  13. 13.
    NHS Workforce Review Team, unpublished data.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Del Giudice ME, Grunfeld E, Harvey BJ, Piliotis E, Verma S. Primary care physicians’ views of routine follow-up care of cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2009. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.20.4883.
  15. 15.
    Cheung WY, Neville BA, Cameron DB, Cook EF, Earle CC. Comparisons of patient and physician expectations for cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2009. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.20.3232.
  16. 16.
    Baravelli C, Krishnasamy M, Pezaro C, Schofield P, Lofti-Jam K, Rogers M, Milne D, Aranda S, King D, Shaw B, Grogan S, Jefford M. The views of bowel cancer survivors and health care professionals regarding survivorship care plans and post treatment follow up. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2009. doi:10.1007/s11764-009-0086-1.
  17. 17.
    Hewitt ME, Bamundo A, Day R, Harvey C. Perspectives on post-treatment cancer care: qualitative research with survivors, nurses and physicians. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(16):2270–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Johansson B, Berglund G, Hoffman K, Glimelius B, Sjoden P-O. The role of the general practitioner in cancer care and the effect of an extended information role. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;18:143–8.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jefford M, Baravelli C, Dudgeon P, Dabscheck A, Evans M, Moloney M, et al. Tailored chemotherapy information faxed to general practitioners improves confidence in managing adverse effects and satisfaction with shared care: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7710.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eila K. Watson
    • 1
  • Elaine M. Sugden
    • 2
  • Peter W. Rose
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Health and Social CareOxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK
  2. 2.Oxford Cancer CentreChurchill HospitalOxfordUK
  3. 3.Department of Primary Health CareUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations