Advertisement

Journal of Cancer Survivorship

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 174–180 | Cite as

Developing a new instrument to assess the impact of cancer in young adult survivors of childhood cancer

  • Brad Zebrack
Article

Abstract

Background

Thirty years of psychosocial oncology research have detailed issues having significant impact in both pediatric and adult populations; yet, few studies have captured the subtle and unique ways in which cancer impacts, disrupts and in some instances promotes the growth and development of adolescents and young adults with a cancer history. This paper reports the initiation of an effort to assess the impact of cancer in this young survivor population through the development of a new Impact of Cancer (IOC) instrument.

Methods

64 young adults aged 18–39 years and treated for a pediatric malignancy participated in face-to-face interviews and responded to questions prompting them to describe the impact of cancer on their physical, psychological, social and spiritual/existential well-being. Intent of analysis was to organize data into meaningful sub-categories from which to develop a set of candidate survey items that assess a range of problems, issues and changes that long-term survivors ascribe to their cancer experience.

Results

A total of 82 candidate survey items represented content across 11 topical domains including Body, Health and Body image, Treatment and Health Care, Having Children, Identity, Talking and Thinking About Cancer, Meaning of Cancer, Memory and Thinking, Finances, Family and Relationships, Socializing, and Life Goals.

Conclusion

Assessing the instrument’s psychometric properties in a large representative group of young cancer survivors is the next step for further development of such a measure. Once established, a valid and reliable Impact of Cancer instrument has the potential for identifying salient survivorship issues in a clinical setting.

Keywords

Instrument development Quality of life Childhood cancer Survivor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work funded through the US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute (K07 CA100380). Also, the author wishes to express his gratitude for the support and assistance received from the following mentors and consultants: Lonnie Zeltzer, Patricia Ganz, Smita Bhatia, Wendy Landier, Kathleen Ruccione, Ernie Katz, Aura Kuperberg, Ron Hays, Leslie Robison, Carolyn Gotay, and Marcia Leonard.

References

  1. 1.
    Zebrack BJ, Cella D. Evaluating quality of life in cancer survivors. In: Lipscomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder C, editors. Outcomes measurement in cancer: measures, methods, and applications. Edition Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hobbie WL, Stuber M, Meeske K, Rourke M, Ruccione K, Kinkle A, Kazak A. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(24):4060–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koocher G, O’Malley J. The damocles syndrome. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1981.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moore I, Glasser M, Ablin A. Late psychosocial consequences of childhood cancer. J Pediatr Nurs. 1987;3:150–58.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zebrack BJ, Zeltzer LK, Whitton J, Mertens AC, Odom L, Berkow R, et al. Psychological outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood leukemia, Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Pediatrics. 2002;110(1):42–52. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.1.42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meeske K, Ruccione K, Globe DR, Stuber ML. Posttraumatic stress, quality of life, and psychological distress in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001;28:481–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fritz GK, Williams JR, Amylon M. After treatment ends: Psychosocial sequelae in pediatric cancer survivors. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1988;58:552–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gray RE, Doan BD, Shermer P, Fitzgerald AV, Berry MP, Jenkin D, et al. Psychologic adaptation of survivors of childhood cancer. Cancer. 1992;70:2713–21. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19921201)70:11<2713::AID-CNCR2820701124>3.0.CO;2-T.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zebrack BJ, Zevon MA, Turk N, Nagarajan R, Whitton J, Robison LL, et al. Psychological distress in long-term survivors of solid tumors diagnosed in childhood: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;49(1):47–51. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20914.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kazak A, Meadows A. Families of young adolescents who have survived cancer: Social-emotional adjustment, adaptability, and social support. J Pediatr Psychol. 1989;14:175–91. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/14.2.175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kupst M, Natta M, Richardson C, Schulman JL, Lavigne JV, Das L. Family coping with pediatric leukemia: Ten years after treatment. J Pediatr Psychol. 1995;20(5):601–17. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/20.5.601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eiser C, Havermans T. Long-term social adjustment after treatment for childhood cancer. Arch Dis Child. 1994;70:66–70. doi: 10.1136/adc.70.1.66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chesler MA. Some survivors of childhood cancer are "thriving" -- Illusion or reality? A synthetic review of the literature and our empirical work. CRSO Working Paper Series, #589. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Research on Social Organization 2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arnholt U, Fritz G, Keener M. Self-concept in survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1993;11:1–16. doi: 10.1300/J077V11N01_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elkin D, Phipps S, Mulhern R, Fairclough D. Psychological functioning of adolescent and young adult survivors of pediatric malignancy. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1997;29:582–88. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-911X(199712) 29:6<582::AID-MPO13>3.0.CO;2-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maggiolini A, Grassi R, Adamoli L, Corbetta A, Charmet GP, Provantini K, et al. Self-image of adolescent survivors of long-term childhood leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2000;22(5):417–21. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200009000-00006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weigers ME, Chesler MA, Zebrack BJ, Goldman S. Self-reported worries among long-term survivors of childhood cancer and their peers. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1998;16:1–24. doi: 10.1300/J077V16N02_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crom DB, Chathaway DK, Tolley EA, Mulhern RK, Hudson MM. Health status and health-related quality of life in long-term survivors of pediatric solid tumors. Int J Cancer. 1999;83(S12):25–31. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(1999)83:12+<25::AID-IJC6>3.0.CO;2-Q.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, Barr RD, Torrance GW, Rosenbaum P, Weitzman S. A comprehensive multiattribute system for classifying the health status of survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10(6):923–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Schaik CS, Barr RD, DePauw S, Furlong W, Feeny D. Assessment of health status and health-related quality of life in survivors of Hodgkin’s disease in childhood. Int J Cancer. 1999;83(S12):32–38. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(1999)83:12+<32::AID-IJC7>3.0.CO;2-V.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. A 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care. 1992;30:473–83. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(3):570–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zeltzer LK, Lu Q, Leisenring W, Tsao JCI, Recklitis C, Armstrong G, et al. Psychosocial outcomes and health-related quality of life in adult childhood cancer survivors: A report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(2):435–46. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ferrell BR, Hassey Dow K, Grant M. Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 1995;4:523–31. doi: 10.1007/BF00634747.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ferrans CE, Power MJ. Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties. Annals of Nursing Science. 1995;8:15–24.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Katz ER, Meeske K, Dickinson P. The PedsQL™ in pediatric cancer: Reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life inventoryTM generic core scales, multidimensional fatigue scale, and cancer module. Cancer. 2002;94(7):2090–106. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goodwin DAJ, Boggs SR, Graham-Pole J. Development and validation of the pediatric oncology quality of life scale. Psychol Assess. 1994;6:321–28. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bhatia S, Jenney MEM, Bogue MK, Tockwood TH, Feusner JH, Friedman DL, et al. The Minneapolis-Manchester quality of life instrument: reliability and validity of the adolescent form. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(24):4692–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wyatt GKH, Friedman LL. Development and testing of a quality of life model for long-term female cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:387–94. doi: 10.1007/BF00433923.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zebrack BJ, Chesler MA. Quality of life in long-term survivors of childhood cancer. Psycho-Oncol. 2002;11:132–41. doi: 10.1002/pon.569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zebrack BJ, Chesler MA. A psychometric analysis of the Quality of Life–Cancer Survivors in survivors of childhood cancer. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:319–29. doi: 10.1023/A:1012228823115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Horner MJ, Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, et al. (eds) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2006, National Cancer Institute 2008. Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage; 1990.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Singleton RA, Straits BC. Survey Interviewing. In: Gubrium JF, Holstein JA, editors. Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method. Edition Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002. p. 59–82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Michigan School of Social WorkAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations