Journal of Cancer Survivorship

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 59–65 | Cite as

Self-reported global function among adult survivors of childhood lower-extremity bone tumors: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS)

  • Rajaram Nagarajan
  • Rona Mogil
  • Joesph P. Neglia
  • Leslie L. Robison
  • Kirsten K. Ness
Article

Abstract

Introduction

Adult survivors of childhood lower-extremity bone tumors may experience physical and psychosocial late effects that impact physical performance, global function and quality of life. The identification of survivors at greatest risk for poor outcomes will inform potential intervention targets.

Methods

Study participants were selected from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS), a multi-institutional study of childhood cancer survivors. Adult survivors (n = 629) of either childhood onset osteosarcoma or Ewing’s sarcoma, with a primary tumor location in the lower-extremity were identified and contacted via mail to complete an additional questionnaire. Participants completed the Reintegration into Normal Living Index (RNL) to evaluate global function (maximum score of 22), daily function (maximum score of 16) and self perception (maximum score of 6).

Results

Survivors reported high levels of global function with an adjusted mean overall RNL index score of 20.6 (SE 0.14), mean daily function score of 15.0 (SD 0.10) and mean self perception score of 5.6 (SE 0.05). While female gender and increasing age were associated with lower RNL scores, the magnitude of difference is of questionable clinical significance. Global function was only moderately correlated with physical performance (r = 0.56) and QOL (r = 0.59).

Discussion

Based upon the RNL index, the vast majority of long-term survivors of childhood lower extremity bone tumors adapt well to their environment.

Implications for cancer survivors

While some long-term survivors of lower-extremity bone tumors may report measurable limitations in physical performance and quality of life, the majority do not report moderate or severe difficulties with social integration.

Keywords

Bone sarcoma Global function Physical performance Quality of life Childhood cancer survivor 

References

  1. 1.
    Ries L, Melbert D, Krapcho M, Stinchcomb D, Howlader N, Horner M, et al. July 14. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2005. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2008 [updated 2008; cited 2008 July 14]; Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2005/, based on November 2007 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site.
  2. 2.
    Nagarajan R, Neglia JP, Clohisy DR, Robison LL. Limb salvage and amputation in survivors of pediatric lower-extremity bone tumors: what are the long-term implications? J Clin Oncol 2002;20(22):4493–501, Nov 15. doi:10.1200/JCO.2002.09.006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eiser C, Grimer RJ. Quality of life in survivors of a primary bone tumour: a systematic review. Sarcoma 1999;3(3–4):183–90. doi:10.1080/13577149977622.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ness KK, Mertens AC, Hudson MM, Wall MM, Leisenring WM, Oeffinger KC, et al. Limitations on physical performance and daily activities among long-term survivors of childhood cancer. Ann Intern Med 2005;143(9):639–47, Nov 1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zeltzer LK, Lu Q, Leisenring W, Tsao JC, Recklitis C, Armstrong G, et al. Psychosocial outcomes and health-related quality of life in adult childhood cancer survivors: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(2):435–46, Feb. doi:10.1158/1055–9965.EPI–07–2541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. Reintegration to normal living as a proxy to quality of life. J Chronic Dis 1987;40(6):491–502. doi:10.1016/0021–9681(87)90005–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wood-Dauphinee SL, Opzoomer MA, Williams JI, Marchand B, Spitzer WO. Assessment of global function: the reintegration to normal living index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69(8):583–90, Aug.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Organization WH. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robison LL, Mertens AC, Boice JD, Breslow NE, Donaldson SS, Green DM, et al. Study design and cohort characteristics of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a multi-institutional collaborative project. Med Pediatr Oncol 2002;38(4):229–39, Apr. doi:10.1002/mpo.1316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nissen SJ, Newman WP. Factors influencing reintegration to normal living after amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73(6):548–51, Jun.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brindis CIC, Millstein S. United States Profile. In: McAarnaey EKR, Orr D, Comerci G, editors. Textbook of Adolescent Medicine. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1992. p. 12–27.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kreipe R. Normal somatic adolescent growth and development. In: McAarnaey EKR, Orr D, Comerci G, editors. Textbook of adolescent medicine. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1992. p. 44–67.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davis AM, Bell RS, Badle EM, Yoshida K, Williams JI. Evaluating functional outcome in patients with lower extremity sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (358):90–100, Jan.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davis AM, Wright JG, Williams JI, Bombardier C, Griffin A, Bell RS. Development of a measure of physical function for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Qual Life Res 1996;5(5):508–16, Oct. doi:10.1007/BF00540024.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marchese VG, Rai SN, Carlson CA, Hinds PS, Spearing EM, Zhang L, et al. Assessing functional mobility in survivors of lower-extremity sarcoma: reliability and validity of a new assessment tool. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;49(2):183–9, Aug. doi:10.1002/pbc.20932.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferrell BR, Dow KH, Grant M. Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 1995;4(6):523–31, Dec. doi:10.1007/BF00634747.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ferrell BR, Dow KH, Leigh S, Ly J, Gulasekaram P. Quality of life in long-term cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum 1995;22(6):915–22, Jul.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nagarajan R, Clohisy DR, Neglia JP, Yasui Y, Mitby PA, Sklar C, et al. Function and quality-of-life of survivors of pelvic and lower extremity osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma: the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Br J Cancer 2004;91(11):1858–65, Nov. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davis AM, Devlin M, Griffin AM, Wunder JS, Bell RS. Functional outcome in amputation versus limb sparing of patients with lower extremity sarcoma: a matched case-control study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(6):615–8, Jun. doi:10.1016/S0003–9993(99)90161–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tunn PU, Pomraenke D, Goerling U, Hohenberger P. Functional outcome after endoprosthetic limb-salvage therapy of primary bone tumours-a comparative analysis using the MSTS score, the TESS and the RNL index. Int Orthop 2008;32(5):619–25, Oct. doi:10.1007/s00264–007–0388–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schreiber D, Bell RS, Wunder JS, O’Sullivan B, Turcotte R, Masri BA, et al. Evaluating function and health related quality of life in patients treated for extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Qual Life Res 2006;15(9):1439–46, Nov. doi:10.1007/s11136–006–0001–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Daverat P, Petit H, Kemoun G, Dartigues JF, Barat M. The long term outcome in 149 patients with spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1995;33(11):665–8, Nov.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Donnelly C, Eng JJ. Pain following spinal cord injury: the impact on community reintegration. Spinal Cord 2005;43(5):278–82, May. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101702.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stark SL, Edwards DF, Hollingsworth H, Gray DB. Validation of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index in a population of community-dwelling people with mobility limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(2):344–5, Feb. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rapkin BD, Schwartz CE. Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health QualLife Outcomes 2004;2:14, Mar 15. doi:10.1186/1477–7525–2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajaram Nagarajan
    • 1
  • Rona Mogil
    • 3
  • Joesph P. Neglia
    • 2
  • Leslie L. Robison
    • 3
  • Kirsten K. Ness
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Hematology-OncologyCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of MedicineCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Division of Hematology-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Department of PediatricsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology and Cancer ControlSt. Jude Childrens Research HospitalMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations