Cognitive effects of Tamoxifen in pre-menopausal women with breast cancer compared to healthy controls
- 331 Downloads
The selective estrogen receptor modulator, Tamoxifen (TAM), is one of the most frequently prescribed drugs for the treatment of breast cancer; however, its effects on the cognition of users have not been adequately studied. Although TAM is an effective anti-estrogen that blocks tumour growth in the breast, it could also influence the activity of other target estrogen sites, including the brain. The exact nature of this interaction is unknown.
A cross-sectional design was used to compare cognitive task performance of two treatment groups: 1) women using TAM for the treatment of early breast cancer (n = 23); and 2) age-matched, healthy women not using TAM (n = 23). All participants were pre-menopausal, and recipients of chemotherapy were excluded from the study.
It was found that TAM users scored significantly worse than controls on tasks of immediate and delayed visual memory, verbal fluency, immediate verbal memory, visuo-spatial ability, and processing speed.
Although limited by the lack of baseline data and pre-morbid intelligence measures, the results of this exploratory study suggest that at least in pre-menopausal women, TAM may exert a widespread negative influence on cognitive abilities.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Larger, randomized, prospective trials are required to confirm these results; however, TAM use in pre-menopausal breast cancer may be associated with cognitive difficulties. Knowledge and understanding of these complications will be important for professionals in communicating both the benefits and risks of TAM use in breast cancer survivors.
KeywordsEstrogens Estrogen receptor modulators Breast neoplasms Neuro-behavioural manifestations Pre-menopause Tamoxifen
This research was funded by a grant from the Alberta Cancer Board through the Tom Baker Cancer Centre Clinical Research Unit. Dr. Carlson holds the Enbridge Endowed Research Chair in Psychosocial Oncology and an Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research Health Scholar Award.
- 6.van Dam FSAM, Schagen SB, Muller MJ, Boogerd W, van der Wall E, Droogleever Fortuyn ME, et al. Impairment of cognitive function in women receiving adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: high dose versus standard dose chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:210–8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.3.210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Wooley C, McEwen B. Estradiol mediates fluctuation in hippocampal synapse density during the estrous cycle in the adult rat. J Neurosci 1992;12:2549–54.Google Scholar
- 11.Birge SJ, McEwen BS, Wise PM. Effects of estrogen deficiency on brain function. Postgrad Med. 2001, S11–S15, (March).Google Scholar
- 27.McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF. Profile of mood states. San Diego, California: EdITS/Educational and Industrial Testing Service; 1992.Google Scholar
- 28.Meyers J, Meyers K. The Meyers scoring system for the Rey complex figure and recognition trial: professional manual. Odessa, FA: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1995.Google Scholar
- 29.Wechsler D. Wechsler memory scale. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1997.Google Scholar
- 31.Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale-III. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation; 1991.Google Scholar
- 32.Spreen O, Strauss E. A compendium of neuropsychological tests. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University; 1998. p. 263–7. 447–464.Google Scholar
- 33.Kimura D. Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT; 1999.Google Scholar
- 37.Yeudall LT, Fromm D, Reddon JR, Stefanyk WO. Normative data stratified by age and sex for 12 neuropsychological tests. J Clin Psychol 1986;42:918–46. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198611)42:6<918::AID-JCLP2270420617>3.0.CO;2-Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Lafayette Instrument Company. Instructions and normative data for model 32020 Purdue Pegboard. Lafayette, IN: Lafayette Instrument Company; 1985.Google Scholar
- 40.Silverman I, Eals M. Sex differences in spatial abilities: evolutionary theory and data. In: Barkow J, Cosmides L, Tooby J, editors. The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 487–503.Google Scholar
- 41.Kaplan EF, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. The Boston naming test. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2001.Google Scholar