Role of spirituality in cancer coping among African Americans: a qualitative examination
- 383 Downloads
This study used qualitative methods to examine whether, and if so how, African American cancer survivors use spirituality in coping with the disease. Spirituality was defined using a model involving connectedness to self, others, a higher power, and the world.
Twenty-three African American patients with various forms of cancer were recruited from physician offices and completed 1–1.5 h interviews. Data were coded by multiple coders using an inductive process and open-coding.
Themes that emerged included, but were not limited to the aforementioned types of connectedness, one theme being connections to God. Given the important role of social support in the cancer experience, participants also emphasized their connectedness to others, which is in support of the spirituality model. Participants also articulated the notion that connections with others were not always positive, indicating that some perceived certain connections as having a detrimental impact on their well-being. Participants also expressed the desire to share their cancer story with others, often gained a new perspective on life, and obtained new self-understanding as a result of their illness experience.
Findings indicate that African Americans perceive that spirituality plays a strong role in their cancer coping and survivorship. Spirituality may address a human need for certitude in crisis. Further research is warranted for model testing, and to examine the role of spirituality in cancer coping among those of different backgrounds and cancer types/stages.
Implications for cancer survivors
These themes may have utility for the development of support interventions for cancer survivors.
KeywordsSpirituality Coping African Americans Cancer survivorship Narratives Social support
We would like to acknowledge and thank Drs. Mark Dransfield, Andres Forero, Sharon Spencer, and Helen Krontiras for their assistance with participant access and recruitment for this study, and Pat Jackson for her role in data collection.
This publication was supported by Grant Number (no. 1 U54 CA118948-01) from the National Cancer Institute, and was approved by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Review Board (no. X051004004).
- 1.American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures for African Americans 2005–2006. Atlanta, Georgia: American Cancer Society, Inc; 2006.Google Scholar
- 2.American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2004. Atlanta, Georgia: American Cancer Society, Inc.; 2004.Google Scholar
- 5.Thoresen CE. Spirituality, health, and science: the coming revival? In: Roth-Roemer S, Kurpius SR, editors. The emerging role of counseling psychology in health care. New York: W. W. Norton; 1998. p. 409–31.Google Scholar
- 7.Schulz EK. The meaning of spirituality in the lives and adaptation processes of individuals with disabilities. Denton, Texas: Texas Woman’s University; 2002.Google Scholar
- 8.Schulz EK. Testing a spirituality model through measuring adolescent wellness outcomes. Denton, Texas: Texas Woman’s University; 2003.Google Scholar
- 9.Schulz E. OT-Quest assessment. In: B. J. Hemphill-Pearson, editors. Assessments in occupational therapy mental health: An integrative approach. 2nd ed. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2008:264–89.Google Scholar
- 12.Thomas CL, Cohen HL. Understanding spiritual meaning making with older adults. J Theory Constr Test. 2006;10(2):65–70.Google Scholar
- 25.Swensen CH, et al. Stage of religious faith and reactions to cancer. J Psychol Theol. 1993;21(3):238–45.Google Scholar
- 30.Powe BD. Perceptions of cancer fatalism among African Americans: The influence of education, income, and cancer knowledge. J Natl Black Nurses Assoc. 1995;7(2):41–8, Fall-Winter.Google Scholar
- 31.Strauss A, Corbin J. Open coding. In: Strauss A, Corbin J, editors. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage Publications; 1990. p. 61–74.Google Scholar
- 32.Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing; 1967.Google Scholar
- 33.Nunnaly JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 1994.Google Scholar
- 35.Levine S. Who dies? Baltimore, MD: Gateway; 2000.Google Scholar
- 39.Baranson R. The secularization of American medicine. In: Lammers SE, Verhey A, editors. On moral medicine. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: William B Eerdmans pub co; 1998. p. 12–22.Google Scholar