Short term correlates of the Neuro Emotional Technique for cancer-related traumatic stress symptoms: A pilot case series
- 168 Downloads
As many as one quarter of all cancer survivors report traumatic stress symptoms from cancer-related experiences. While the majority of these patients do not meet the criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), there is growing evidence that subsyndromal symptoms can significantly contribute to functional impairment and negative health outcomes. Treatment options for the hallmark symptoms of traumatic stress—unpleasant, intrusive thoughts and avoidant behaviors—have not been well investigated for the cancer survivorship population.
Materials and methods
Seven female cancer survivors with traumatic stress symptoms from cancer-related experiences and no other major psychopathology, were enrolled to receive three sessions of Neuro-Emotional Technique (NET), a brief, targeted treatment that combines traditional desensitization principles with complementary modalities.
Psychological outcome measures (Impact of Event Scale (IES) and Subjective Units of Distress (SUD) and physiological measures (Heart Rate (HR) and Skin Conductance Level (SCL) demonstrated the following changes: 71% on IES, 88% SUD, 74% on HR, and 65% on SCL following the intervention. Statistically significant changes were observed for all four parameters, and effect size g for proportion improved were 0.50 each for IES, SUD, and HR, and 0.20 for SCL.
These cases suggest feasibility of the NET intervention for cancer-related traumatic stress and the potential for change in symptoms and physiological reactivity. Further investigation is needed to determine the specific and long-term effects of such an approach.
Implications for cancer survivors
Traumatic stress from cancer-related experiences might represent a constellation of symptoms that are amenable to brief, targeted interventions.
KeywordsCancer survivors Neuro Emotional Technique NET Traumatic stress Distressing recollections Brief psychotherapy
- 4.Bremner, J. D., Randall, P., Vermetten, E., Staib, L., Bronen, R. A., Mazure, C., et al. (1997). Magnetic resonance imaging-based measurement of hippocampal volume in post-traumatic stress disorder related to childhood physical and sexual abuse—A preliminary report. Biological Psychiatry, 41(1), 23–32 (Jan).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1997). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders-Clinical Version (SCID-CV). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric.Google Scholar
- 9.Flor, H., Miltner, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1992). Psychophysiological recording methods. In D. C. Turk & R. Melzack (Eds.), Handbook of pain assessment (pp. 169–190). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- 10.Foa, E. B., & Jaycock, L. H. (1999). Cognitive-behavioral theory and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. In D. Spiegel (Ed.), Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of psychotherapy (pp. 23–61). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric.Google Scholar
- 12.Hsieh, C.-Y., & Phillips, R. B. (1990). Reliability of manual muscle testing with a computerized dynamometer. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapy, 13, 72.Google Scholar
- 16.Mellman, T. A. (2002). Rationale and role for medication in the comprehensive treatment of PTSD. In R. Yehuda (Ed.), Treating trauma survivors with PTSD (pp. 63–74). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric.Google Scholar
- 21.Stein, M. B., Walker, J. R., Hazen, A. L., Forde, D. R., & David, R. (1997). Full and partial post-traumatic stress disorder: Findings from a community survey. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(9), 114–119.Google Scholar
- 24.Wolpe, J. (1973). The practice of behavior therapy. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar