Follow-up care for young adult survivors of cancer: lessons from pediatrics
- 229 Downloads
Recent advances in treatment of childhood cancer have resulted in overall survival rates approaching 75%, but approximately two-thirds experience late-effects related to the disease or treatment. Consequently, recommendations for comprehensive follow-up have been made. As the number of survivors of adult cancers increase, similar concerns about how to provide follow-up and achieve optimal quality of life are being raised. In this paper we propose that management of cancer survivors diagnosed in young adulthood (18–45 years) could benefit from experience gained treating survivors of childhood cancer.
Materials and methods
We reviewed research relating to differences in survival rates and late-effects; current arrangements for follow-up; effectiveness; and problems in organization of follow-up separately for survivors of child and adult cancers.
A number of models of follow-up were identified. Rationale for follow-up included early identification and treatment of second cancer and late-effects, health promotion and screening. Increasing numbers of survivors and range of late-effects were identified as problems in organizing services. A possible solution is risk-stratified follow-up, currently being developed in pediatrics.
New models of follow-up are needed that take account of financial costs for health services and survivors’ concerns about their current and future health. Implications for continuing refinement of treatment protocols must be an integral part of the service.
Implications for cancer survivors
International standards are needed to ensure all survivors have access to expert follow-up care and can benefit from new information that might lead to earlier treatment of late-effects.
KeywordsFollow-up Pediatric Young adult Late-effects Cancer survivors
We would like to thank all members of the Late Effects Group, Sheffield for comments on an earlier version of this paper. Diana Greenfield and Kate Absolom are supported by the Weston Park Cancer Appeal. Diana Greenfield is also supported by the Laura Crane Trust.
- 3.Albitton, K., & Bleyer, W. (2003). The management of cancer in the older adolescent. European Journal of Cancer, 39, 2584–2599.Google Scholar
- 4.American Cancer Society (1997). Cancer facts and figures. Atlanta: GA.Google Scholar
- 9.Barakat, L., Kazak, A., Gallagher, P., Meeske, K., & Stuber, M. (2000). Posttraumatic stress symptoms and stressful life events predict the long-term adjustment of survivors of childhood cancer and their mothers. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 7, 189–196.Google Scholar
- 10.Bazeos, A., Al Sdhawaf, T., Lower, A., Wilson, C., & Grudzinskas, J. G. (1999). Preservation of reproductive capacity in cancer patients. Reproductive Technology, 10, 42–49.Google Scholar
- 14.Bleyer, W., Tejeda, H., Murphy, S., Robison, L. L., Ross, J. A., Pollack, B. H., & Severson R. K. (1997). National cancer clinical trials: Children have equal access; adolescents do not. Journal of Adolescent Health, 21, 374–375.Google Scholar
- 15.Cancer Research UK (2005). News and Resources web site, CancerStats, http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats.
- 17.CancerStats Monograph (2004). London: Cancer Research UK.Google Scholar
- 21.Celcalupo, A. (1994). Childhood cancers: Medical issues. In R. Olson, L. Mullins, J. Gillman, & J. Chaney (Eds.), The sourcebook of pediatric psychology (pp. 90–97). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- 23.Children’s Oncology Group (COG) (2006). Long-term follow-up for survivors of childhood, adolescent and young adult cancers.Google Scholar
- 35.Doyle, C. (2006). Nutrition and physical activity during and after cancer treatment: An American Cancer Society Guide for Informed Choices. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 56, 323–353.Google Scholar
- 37.Eiser, C., Absolom, K., Greenfield, D., Glaser, A., Horne, B., Waite, H., et al. (in press). Follow-up after childhood cancer: Evaluation of a three-level model. European Journal of Cancer.Google Scholar
- 40.Eshelman, D., Landier, W., Sweeney, T., Hester, A. L., Hudson, M. M., & Forte, K. (2004). Facilitating care for childhood cancer survivors: Integrating children’s oncology group long-term follow up guidelines and health links in clinical practice. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 21, 271–280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Gatta, G., Corazziari, I., Magnani, C., Peris-Bonet, R., Roazzi, P., & Stiller, C. (2003). Childhood cancer survival in Europe. Annals of Oncology, 14, 119–127.Google Scholar
- 46.GIVIO (1994). Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. The GIVIO Investigators. JAMA, 271, 1587–1592.Google Scholar
- 49.Gregory, J., & Rielly, J. (2004). Body composition and obesity. In H. Wallace & D. Green (Eds.), Late effects of childhood cancer (pp. 147–161). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
- 50.Grunfeld, E., Mant, D., Vessey, M. P., & Fitzpatrick, R. (1995). Specialist and general practice views on routine follow-up of breast cancer patients in general practice. Family Practitioner, 12, 60–65.Google Scholar
- 54.Hewitt, M., Greenfield, S., & Stovall, E. (Eds.) (2006). From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- 56.Hudson, M. (2004). Healthy lifestyle and prevention strategies. In H. Wallace & D. Green (Eds.), Late effects of childhood cancer (pp. 366–375). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
- 60.Kattlove, H., & Winn, R. (2003). Ongoing care of patients after primary treatment for their cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 53, 172–196.Google Scholar
- 65.Langeveld, N., Grootenhuis, M., Voute, P., & de Haan, R. J. (2004). Posttraumatic stress symptoms in adult survivors of childhood cancer. Pediatriatric Blood & Cancer, 42, 604–610.Google Scholar
- 74.National Cancer Research Institute (2004). 3 year progress report 2001–2004. London: NCRI.Google Scholar
- 75.National Institute of Clinical Excellence (2002). Improving outcomes in breast cancer: Manual Update.Google Scholar
- 90.Pinkerton, C., Cushing, P., & Sepion, B. (1994). Childhood cancer management. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
- 93.Ries, L. A. G., Eisner, M. P., Kosary, C. L., Brawley, O. W., Smith, M. A., Unquerleider, R. S., et al. (Eds.). SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975–2001. Bethesda MD: National Cancer Institute. http://seer.cancer.gov/car/1975_2001.
- 97.Rousillon, E., Pariene, J., Hostyn, B., Merian, G., Ferriere, J., & Le Guillou, M. (1999). Fertilite masculine apres chimiotherapie: A propos d’une serie de 26 patients traites pour cancer du testicule stade 1. Andrologie, 9, 42–47.Google Scholar
- 102.SIGN (2004). Long term follow-up of survivors of childhood cancer: A national clinical guideline.Google Scholar
- 103.Simone, J., & Lyons, J. (1998). Superior cancer survival in children compared to adults: A superior system of care? Background paper for the 1999 report of the National Cancer Policy Board of the Institute of Medicine, “Ensuring Quality Cancer Care.” http://www.iom.edu/ncpb.
- 104.Skinner, R., Wallace, W., Levitt, G. (Eds.) (2005). Therapy based long-term follow-up: Practice statement: United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group (UKCCSG).Google Scholar
- 112.Taylor, A., Hawkins, M., Griffiths, A., Davies, H., Douglas, C., Jenney, M., et al. (2004). Long-term follow up of survivors of childhood cancer in the UK. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 42, 161–168.Google Scholar
- 117.van Beek, R., de Muinck Keizer-Schrama, S., Hakvoort-Cammel. F., van Der Sluis, I. M., Krenning E. P., Pieters, R., et al. (2006). No difference between prednisolone and dexamethasone treatment in bone mineral density and growth in long term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatriatric Blood & Cancer, 46, 88–93.Google Scholar
- 119.Wallace, W., & Green, D. (Eds.) (2004). Late effects of childhood cancer (1st ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
- 120.Weiner, M. (2000). Principles and practice of pediatric oncology. In R. Bast, D. Kufe, R. Pollock, et al. (Eds.), Cancer medicine. Hamilton, ON: B.C. Decker.Google Scholar
- 121.Wilson, K., & Amir, Z. (2005). Patient choice following initial treatment for cancer: A literature review. Manchester: Macmillan Research Unit.Google Scholar