Signal, Image and Video Processing

, Volume 9, Issue 8, pp 1815–1824 | Cite as

A feature-based solution for 3D registration of CT and MRI images of human knee

  • Jingjie Zheng
  • Zhenyan Ji
  • Kuangdi Yu
  • Qin An
  • Zhiming Guo
  • Zuyi Wu
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper presents a feature-based solution for 3D registration of CT and MRI images of a human knee. It facilitates constructing high-quality models with clear outlining of bone tissues and detailed illustration of soft tissues. The model will be used for analysing the effect of posterior cruciate ligament and anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. The solution consists of preprocessing, feature extraction, transformation parameter estimation and resampling, and blending. In preprocessing, we propose partial preserving and iterative neighbour comparing filtering to help segment bone tissues from MRI images without having to construct a statistical model. Through analysing the characteristics of knee images, tibia and femur are selected as the features and the algorithm for effectively extracting them is described. To estimate transformation parameters, we propose a method based on the statistical information of projected feature images, including translating according to the project feature image centroids and calculating the rotation angle by searching and mapping boundary points. We transform the MRI image and then blend it with the CT image by taking the maximum intensity of every two corresponding voxels from the two images. At the end of the paper, the registration result is evaluated by computing the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient of the binarised features and the accuracy is confirmed.

Keywords

Feature-based image registration Magnetic resonance imaging Computed tomography Human knee 

References

  1. 1.
    Fripp, J., Warfield, S.K., Crozier, S., Ourselin, S.: In: Pattern Recognition, 2006. ICPR 2006. 18th International Conference on, Vol. 1 (IEEE, 2006), pp. 167–170Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goshtasby, A.A.: Image Registration: Principles Tools and Methods. Springer, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alam, M.M., Howlader, T., Rahman, S.M.: Entropy-based image registration method using the curvelet transform. Signal Image Video Process. 8(3), 491–505 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Marchal, G., Suetens, P.: Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16(2), 187 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, J., Fessler, J.A.: Intensity-based image registration using robust correlation coefficients. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23(11), 1430 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bouchiha, R., Besbes, K.: Comparison of local descriptors for automatic remote sensing image registration. Signal Image Video Process. 1–7 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Can, A., Stewart, C.V., Roysam, B., Tanenbaum, H.L.: A feature-based technique for joint, linear estimation of high-order image-to-mosaic transformations: mosaicing the curved human retina. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24(3), 347 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dai, X., Khorram, S.: A feature-based image registration algorithm using improved chain-code representation combined with invariant moments. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 37(5), 2351 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boda, S.: In: Feature-Based Image Registration. Ph.D. thesis (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zitova, B., Flusser, J.: Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vis. Comput. 21(11), 977 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tomaževič, D., Likar, B., Pernuš, F.: Multi-feature mutual information image registration. Image Anal. Stereol. 31(1), 43 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ji, Z., Wei, H.: The registration of knee joint images with preprocessing. Int. J. Image Graphics Signal Proc. (IJIGSP) 3(4), 10 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Powell, M. J.: An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives. Comput. J. 7(2), 155–162 (1964)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pan, X., Zhao, K., Liu, J., Kang, Y.: In: Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI), 2010 3rd International Conference on, Vol. 1 (IEEE, 2010), pp. 18–22Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kapur, T., Beardsley, P., Gibson, S., Grimson, W., Wells, W.: In: Proceedings of IEEE Intl Workshop on Model-Based 3D Image Analysis (Citeseer, 1998), pp. 97–106Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poynton, C.: Digital Video and HD: Algorithms and Interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, Massachusetts (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Otsu, N.: A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. Automatica 11(285–296), 23 (1975)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roberts, L.G.: In: Machine Perception of Three-Dimensional Solids. Technical Report, DTIC Document (1963)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shah, P., Srikanth, T., Merchant, S.N.: In: U.B. Desai, Signal, Image and Video Processing pp. 1–16 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jingjie Zheng
    • 1
  • Zhenyan Ji
    • 1
  • Kuangdi Yu
    • 1
  • Qin An
    • 1
  • Zhiming Guo
    • 1
  • Zuyi Wu
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Software EngineeringBeijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of ScienceBeijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations