Signal, Image and Video Processing

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 865–871 | Cite as

Photo-mosaicing of images of pipe inner surface

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper describes the algorithm for the construction of continuous visually consistent images of the inner surface of a pipe from a sequence of images acquired by a wide-angle camera that traveled inside the pipe. The algorithm is designed to be a proof of concept and performs well on simulated data (rendered images) even when camera poses (attitude and location) have errors as much as 5%. Photo-mosaics are suitable for traditional (visual) inspection or automatic processing for the detection of manufacturing faults, corroded areas, and cracks. It is demonstrated that the quality of the resulting mosaic depends how the camera is oriented with respect to the pipe axis and that the traditional orientation with an almost collinear camera optical axis and the pipe axis is not the optimal choice. The proposed system is useful for inspection of pipelines that cannot accommodate traditional devices (e.g., pipeline inspection gauges or crawlers), for example, small-scale boilers and gas systems.

Keywords

Mosaicing Stereoscopic processing Pipe inspection Monocular stereoscopy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kannala J., Brandt S.S.: A generic camera model and calibration method for conventional, wide-angle and fish-eye lenses. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 28, 1335–1340 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lowe D.G.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoint. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 60, 91–110 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jokinen, O.: Reconstruction of quadric surfaces from disparity measurements. In: Tescher, A.G. (ed.) Applications of Digital Image Processing XVII, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 2298, pp. 593–604. (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hartley, R., Zisserman, A.: Multiple view geometry. Second edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 0521 54051 8 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bay H., Ess A., Tuytelaars T., Van Gool L.: SURF: speeded up robust features. Computer Vision and Image Understanding (CVIU) 110, 346–359 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harris, C., Stephens, M.: A combined corner and edge detector. In: Proceedings of the 4th Alvey Vision Conference, pp. 147–151. (1988)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kanazawa, Y., Uemura, K.: Wide baseline matching using triplet vector descriptor. In: Proceedings of the 17th British Machine Vision Conference, pp. 267–276. (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Torr P.H.S., Murray D.W.: The development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 24, 271–300 (1997). doi:10.1023/A:1007927408552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Agarwala, A., Dontcheva, M., Agrawala, M., Drucker, S., Colburn, A., Curless, B., Salesin, D., Cohen, M.: Interactive digital photomontage. In: Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH’04 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chaperon, T., Goulette, F.: Extracting cylinders in full 3D data using a random sampling method and the Gaussian image. In: Proceedings of the Vision, Modelling and Visualisation, pp. 35–42 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rabbani, T., van den Heuvel, F.: Efficient Hough transform for automatic detection of cylinders in point clouds. In: ISPRS, Workshop “Laser scanning 2005” (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Coastal and Ocean MappingUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations