Advertisement

Archaeologies

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 400–416 | Cite as

The Origins of Extreme Economic Inequality: An Archaeologist’s Take on a Contemporary Controversy

  • Sarah KurnickEmail author
Research

Abstract

In 1754, the Academy of Dijon sponsored a contest for the best examination of the origins of human inequality. Although not the winning entry, Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Discourse on the Origins and Basis of Inequality among Men remains the most widely read and influential submission. This article uses archaeological data unavailable in the eighteenth century to address Rousseau’s questions anew—questions still of critical importance. Are humans naturally prone to extreme economic inequality? If not, when, how, and why did such inequality arise? And, did drastic imbalances in wealth benefit all members of early societies or only a few?

Key Words

Inequality Economic Disparities Public Archaeology Action Archaeology 

Résumé

En 1754, l’académie de Dijon avait parrainé le concours du meilleur examen de l’origine de l’inégalité humaine. Bien qu’il n’en fût pas le gagnant, le Discours de Rousseau sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes reste la présentation la plus lue et la plus influente. Cet article utilise les données archéologiques indisponibles au XVIIIe siècle pour traiter à nouveau des questions de Rousseau, questions qui sont toujours d’une importance cruciale. Les humains sont-ils naturellement exposés à une inégalité économique extrême ? Si non, quand, comment et pourquoi ces inégalités sont-elles apparues ? Et de forts déséquilibres de richesses bénéficiaient-ils à tous les membres des sociétés anciennes ou à quelques-uns seulement ?

Resumen

En 1754, la Academia de Dijon patrocinó un certamen sobre el mejor análisis de los orígenes de la desigualdad humana. Aunque no fue ganador, el Discurso sobre el origen de la desigualdad entre los hombres, de Rousseau, sigue siendo el documento más influyente y más leído. El presente artículo utiliza datos arqueológicos no disponibles en el siglo XVIII para abordar las preguntas de Rousseau, de nuevo - preguntas que siguen siendo de importancia crítica. ¿Somos los humanos propensos de manera natural a una desigualdad económica extrema? Si no es así, ¿cuándo, cómo, y por qué surgió dicha desigualdad? Y, ¿los drásticos desequilibrios en riqueza beneficiaron a todos los miembros de la primeras sociedades o sólo a algunos?

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the University of Colorado Boulder and the Gerda Henkel Foundation for their generous support of my research. I would also like to thank Richard M. Leventhal and Jeremy A. Sabloff for their incisive comments on earlier drafts of the article.

References

  1. Ames, K. (2012) On the Evolution of the Human Capacity for Inequality and/or Egalitarianism. In Pathways to Power: New Perspectives on the Emergence of Social Inequalitypp. 15–44, edited by TD Priceand GM Feinman, SpringerNew York.,Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, J. E. 1992. Complex Hunter-Gatherer-Fishers of Prehistoric California: Chiefs, Specialists, and Maritime Adaptations of the Channel Islands. American Antiquity 57:60–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold, J. E. (1995) Social Inequality, Marginalization, and Economic Process. In Foundations of Social Inequalitypp. 87–103, edited by TD Priceand GM Feinman, SpringerNew York.,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapman, R. (2003) Archaeologies of Complexity, RoutledgeLondon.,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Childe, G. (1936) Man Makes Himself, London Watts & Co.London.,Google Scholar
  6. Childe, G. 1950. The Urban Revolution. The Town Planning Review 21:3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drennan, R. D., Peterson, C. E., Fox, J. R. (2012) Degrees and Kinds of Inequality. In Pathways to Power: New Perspectives on the Emergence of Social Inequalitypp. 45–76, edited by TD Priceand GM Feinman, SpringerNew York.,Google Scholar
  8. Haviland, W. A., Moholy-Nagy, H. (1992) Distinguishing the High and Mighty from the Hoi Polloi at Tikal, Guatemala. In Mesoamerican Elites: An Archaeological Assessmentpp. 50–60, edited by DZ Chaseand AF Chase, University of Oklahoma PressNorman.,Google Scholar
  9. Hayden, B. (2001) Richman, Poorman, Beggarman, Chief: The Dynamics of Social Inequality. In Archaeology at the Millenniumpp. 231–272, edited by GM Feinmanand TD Price, SpringerNew York.,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayden, B. (2011) Big Man, Big Heart? The Political Role of Aggrandizers in Egalitarian and Transegalitarian Societies. In For the Greater Good of All: Perspectives on Individualism, Society, and Leadershippp. 101–118, edited by DR Forsythand CL Hoyt, Palgrave MacmillianNew York.,Google Scholar
  11. Hearne, P., Sharer, R. J. (1992) River of Gold—Precolumbian Treasures from Sitio Conte, UPenn Museum of ArchaeologyPhiladelphia.,Google Scholar
  12. Hobbes, T. (1904) Leviathan: Or, The Matter, Forme & Power of a Commonwealth, University PressEcclesiasticall and Civill.,Google Scholar
  13. Lee, R. 1969. Eating Christmas in the Kalahari. Natural History 78:14–61.Google Scholar
  14. Marx, K., Engels, F. (1967) Manifesto of the Communist Party, Penguin BooksLondon.,Google Scholar
  15. Marx, K., Engels, F. (1970) The German Ideology, International PublishersNew York.,Google Scholar
  16. Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Belknap PressCambridge.,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rousseau, J.-J. (2010) A Discourse on Inequality. In Foundations of Anthropological Theory: From Classical Antiquity to Early Modern Europepp. 251–259, edited by R Launay, Wiley-BlackwellMalden.,Google Scholar
  18. Scott, J. C. (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts, Yale University PressNew Haven.,Google Scholar
  19. Testart, A., Forbis, R. G., Hayden, B., Ingold, T., Perlman, S. M., Pokotylo, D. L., Rowley-Conwy, P., Stuart, D. E. 1982. The Significance of Food Storage Among Hunter-Gatherers: Residence Patterns, Population Densities, and Social Inequalities [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology 23:523–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bibliography

  1. Atalay, S., Clauss, L. R., McGuire, R. H., Welch, J. R. (eds.) (2014) Transforming Archaeology: Activist Practices and Prospects, Left Coast PressWalnut Creek.,Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University PressCambridge.,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Harvard University PressLondon.,Google Scholar
  4. Bowles, S., Smith, E. A., Mulder, M. B. 2010. The Emergence and Persistence of Inequality in Premodern Societies: Introduction to the Special Section. Current Anthropology 51:7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, J. E., Blake, M. (1994) The Power of Prestige: Competitive Generosity and the Emergence of Rank Societies in Lowland Mesoamerica. In Factional Competition and Political Development in the New Worldpp. 17–30, edited by EM Brumfieland JW Fox, Cambridge University PressCambridge.,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Earle, T. (1997) How Chiefs Come to Power: The Political Economy in Prehistory, Stanford University PressStanford.,Google Scholar
  7. Flannery, K., Marcus, J. (2012) The Creation of Inequality: How Our Prehistoric Ancestors Set the Stage for Monarchy, Slavery, and Empire, Harvard University PressCambridge.,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Vintage BooksNew York.,Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977, Pantheon PressNew York.,Google Scholar
  10. Johansen, P. G., Bauer, A. M. (eds.) (2011) The Archaeology of Politics: The Materiality of Political Practice and Action in the Past, Cambridge Scholars PublishingNewcastle upon Tyne.,Google Scholar
  11. Kertzer, D. I. (1988) Ritual, Politics, and Power, Yale University PressNew Haven.,Google Scholar
  12. Little, B. J. (ed.) (2002) Public Benefits of Archaeology, University Press of FloridaGainesville.,Google Scholar
  13. Little, B. J., Shackel, P. A. (eds.) (2007) Archaeology as a Tool of Civic Engagement, AltaMira PressLanham.,Google Scholar
  14. Mann, M. (1986) The Sources of Social Power: A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760, Cambridge University PressCambridge.,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McGuire, R. H. (ed.) (1991) The Archaeology of Inequality, BlackwellOxford.,Google Scholar
  16. McGuire, R. H. (2008) Archaeology as Political Action, University of California PressOakland.,Google Scholar
  17. Paynter, R. 1989. The Archaeology of Equality and Inequality. Annual Review of Anthropology 18:369–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Price, T. D., Feinman, G. M. (eds.) (1995) Foundations of Social Inequality, SpringerNew York.,Google Scholar
  19. Price, T. D., Feinman, G. M. (eds.) (2012) Pathways to Power: New Perspectives on the Emergence of Social Inequality, SpringerNew York.,Google Scholar
  20. Pringle, H. 2014. The Ancient Roots of the 1%. Science 344:822–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sabloff, J. A. (2008) Archaeology Matters: Action Archaeology in the Modern World, Left CoastWalnut Creek.,Google Scholar
  22. Sabloff, J. A. 2011. Where Have You Gone, Margaret Mead? Anthropology and Public Intellectuals. American Anthropologist 113:408–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith, A. T. (2003) The Political Landscape: Constellations of Authority in Early Complex Polities, University of California PressBerkeley.,Google Scholar
  24. Stottman, M. J. (ed.) (2011) Archaeologists as Activists: Can Archaeologists Change the World?, University of Alabama PressTuscaloosa.,Google Scholar

Copyright information

© World Archaeological Congress 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Colorado BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations