Advertisement

Archaeologies

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 293–312 | Cite as

Materiality and Autonomy in the Pocumtuck Homeland

  • Margaret M. Bruchac
  • Siobhan M. Hart
Research

Abstract

The Indigenous people of New England’s middle Connecticut River Valley are often imagined as having been subservient to powerful tribal nations elsewhere. Yet, archaeological and ethnohistorical evidence suggests Pocumtuck independence and autonomy in relations with neighboring Native groups and with Dutch, English, and French colonizers during the seventeenth century. We employ a decolonizing framework, drawing on H.M. Wobst’s critique of the preoccupation with dominance and geopolitical “centers” to analyze this evidence. By framing artifacts, colonial texts, and cultural interactions as both past and present “material interventions,” we can generate better understandings of Pocumtuck political autonomy, agency and identity.

Key Words

Indigenous New England Decolonizing Pocumtuck 

Résumé

On imagine souvent que le peuple indigène qui occupait le milieu de la vallée de la rivière Connecticut en Nouvelle Angleterre vivait sous le joug de puissantes nations tribales voisines. Cependant, les données archéologiques et ethno-historiques suggèrent que le peuple Pocumtuck vivait de façon indépendante et autonome tout en entretenant des relations avec des groupes indigènes voisins et avec les colons néerlandais, anglais et français au cours du dix-septième siècle. Le cadre d’analyse décolonisant que nous utilisons emprunte à la critique de H.M. Wobst de la trop grande préoccupation pour la domination et les « centres » géopolitiques dans l’analyse de ces données. En abordant les objets, les textes coloniaux et les interactions culturelles comme des « interventions matérielles » passées et présentes, nous pouvons générer une meilleure compréhension de l’autonomie politique, de la capacité d’action et de l’identité du peuple Pocumtuck.

Resumen

A menudo se ha imaginado que los pueblos indígenas de la parte media del Valle del Río Connecticut de Nueva Inglaterra han estado subordinados a nacionales tribales poderosas en otras partes. Sin embargo, la evidencia arqueológica y etnohistórica sugiere la independencia y autonomía de Pocumtuck en relación con los grupos nativos vecinos y con los colonizadores holandeses, ingleses y franceses durante el siglo XVII. Empleamos un marco descolonizador, inspirándonos en la crítica de H.M. Wobst sobre la preocupación con los “centros” geopolíticos y de predominio para analizar esta evidencia. Enmarcando artefactos, textos coloniales e interacciones culturales, tanto “intervenciones materiales” pasadas como presentes, podemos generar una mejor comprensión de la identidad, acción y autonomía política de Pocumtuck.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We offer a heartfelt thanks to H. Martin Wobst for inspiration and unflagging support. Whether meeting among the stacks of papers in his office, or meandering on an unexpected hike in an unfamiliar place, Martin has taken us down compelling intellectual pathways we would not have found on our own. We are grateful to Kimberly Kasper and Bob Paynter for organizing the AAA session in honor of Martin, and we thank them and Broughton Anderson for their work in seeing this through to publication. Two anonymous reviewers are thanked for their comments. Thanks are due to Memorial Libraries in Deerfield, Forbes Library in Northampton, and the Massachusetts Historical Society for archiving so much of the crucial seventeenth-century documentation. Archaeological investigations of the Area D site were made possible by staff and students of the UMass Field School in Archaeology in 2006, 2008, and 2011 with support from Historic Deerfield, Inc. We thank the Massachusetts Commission on Indian Affairs for their support of this project. Will Griffin and Taber Morrell (Binghamton University) contributed to the analysis of the Area D copper alloy. A WBH Dowse Fellowship (2005) from the Massachusetts Historical Society supported Siobhan Hart’s research on seventeenth-century Native American forts. Two Graduate School Fellowships at the University of Massachusetts Amherst supported her dissertation research on the Area D site in 2006–2008. Margaret Bruchac’s research on Pocumtuck history was inspired by a Bay State Historical League Fellowship at the Pocumtuck Valley Memorial Association in 1998, and supported by two Graduate School Fellowships at the University of Massachusetts Amherst in 2002–2004 and the Five College Dissertation Fellowship at Amherst College in 2004–2005. Special thanks are also due to Peter Thomas for his groundbreaking work on CRV history and his insights on the Pocumtuck Fort site.

Note

  1. 1.

    The National Park Service’s National NAGPRA program requires institutions holding collections of human remains to determine the cultural affiliation of Native American remains using a “preponderance of the evidence” derived from all available sources (National NAGPRA 1999, 2012).

     

References Cited

  1. Bridenbaugh, Carl, Tomlinson, Juliette (1985) The Pynchon Papers, Volume II, Selections from the Account Books of John Pynchon, 1651–1697, Colonial Society of MassachusettsBoston.,Google Scholar
  2. Brooks, Lisa T. (2008) The Common Pot: The Recovery of Native Space in the Northeast, University of Minnesota PressMinneapolis.,Google Scholar
  3. Bruchac, Margaret M. 2011. Revisiting Pocumtuck History in Deerfield: George Sheldon’s Vanishing Indian Act. Historical Journal of Massachusetts 39(1/2):30–77.Google Scholar
  4. Bruchac, Margaret M. 2007. Historical Erasure and Cultural Recovery: Indigenous People in the Connecticut River Valley. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
  5. Bruchac, Margaret M., Hart, Siobhan M., Wobst, H. Martin (eds.) (2010) Indigenous Archaeologies: A Reader on Decolonization, Left Coast PressWalnut Creek.,Google Scholar
  6. Bruchac, Margaret M., and Peter Thomas 2006. Locating “Wissatinnewag”: John Pynchon’s Influence on Pocumtuck Diplomacy. The Historical Journal of Massachusetts XXXIV(1):56–82.Google Scholar
  7. Chilton, Elizabeth S. (2002) “Towns They Have None”: Diverse Subsistence and Settlement Strategies in Native New England. In Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700–1300pp. 289–300, edited by John P Hartand Christina B Reith, New York State MuseumAlbany.,Google Scholar
  8. Chilton, Elizabeth S. (1999) Mobile Farmers of Pre-Contact Southern New England: The Archaeological and Ethnohistoric Evidence. In Current Northeast Paleoethnobotany494, pp. 157–176, edited by John P Hart, New York State MuseumAlbany.,Google Scholar
  9. Chilton, Elizabeth S. (1998) The Cultural Origins of Technological Choice: Unraveling Algonquian and Iroquoian Ceramic Traditions in the Northeast. In The Archaeology of Social Boundariespp. 132–160, edited by Miriam T Stark, Smithsonian Institution PressWashington and London.,Google Scholar
  10. Chilton, Elizabeth S. 1996. Embodiments of Choice: Native American Ceramic Diversity in the New England Interior. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
  11. Chilton, Elizabeth S., Hart, Siobhan M. 2009. Crafting Collaborative Archaeologies: Two Case Studies from New England. Collaborative Anthropologies 2:87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cronon, William (1983) Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England, Hill and WangNew York.,Google Scholar
  13. Day, Gordon M. (1984) The Ouragie War: A Case History in Iroquois-New England Indian Relations. In Extending the Rafters: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Iroquoian Studiespp. 35–50, edited by Michael K Foster, Jack Campisiand Marianne Mithun, State University of New York PressAlbany.,Google Scholar
  14. Delabarre, Edmund B., Wilder, Harris H. 1920. Indian Corn-Hills in Massachusetts. American Anthropologist 22(3):203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobres, Marcia, Robb, John (2000) Agency in Archaeology, RoutledgeLondon.,Google Scholar
  16. Donta, Christopher L. and Jennifer Wendt 2006. Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey for the Northstar Natural Gas Pipeline, Northampton, Hatfield, and Hadley, Massachusetts. On file at the Massachusetts Historical Commission, Office of the Secretary of State, Boston.Google Scholar
  17. Everett, Edward 1835. An Address Delivered at Bloody Brook, in South Deerfield, September 30, 1835, in Commemoration of the Fall of the “Flower of Essex,” at that Spot, in King Philip’s War, September 18, 1675. Russell, Shattuck, & Williams, Boston.Google Scholar
  18. Fernow, Berthold (ed.) (1881) Documents Relating to the Colonial History of the State of New York, Vol. XIII, Weed, Parsons and CompanyAlbany.,Google Scholar
  19. Hamell, George R. (1996) Wampum. In Encyclopedia of North American Indianspp. 662–664, edited by Frederick E Hoxie, Houghton MifflinBoston.,Google Scholar
  20. Hart, Siobhan M. 2009. High Stakes: A Poly-Communal Archaeology of the Pocumtuck Fort, Deerfield, Massachusetts. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
  21. Hart, Siobhan M., and Elizabeth S. Chilton 2008. Report on the 2006 UMass Archaeological Field School and 2007 Investigations at Area D (19-FR-415), Deerfield, MA. On file at the Massachusetts Historical Commission, Office of the Secretary of State, Boston.Google Scholar
  22. Hart, Siobhan M., and Elizabeth S. Chilton 2006. Summary Report on the 2004 UMass Archaeological Field School Testing on Eaglebrook School Property. On file at the Massachusetts Historical Commission, Office of the Secretary of State, Boston.Google Scholar
  23. Johnson, Eric S. 1993. Some by Flatteries and Others by Threatenings: Political Strategies Among Native Americans of Seventeenth-century New England. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, Eric S., Bradley, James W. 1987. The Bark Wigwams Site: An Early Seventeenth-Century Component in Central Massachusetts. Man in the Northeast 33:1–26.Google Scholar
  25. Karklins, Karlis (1992) Trade Ornament Usage among the Native Peoples of Canada: A Source Book, Canadian Parks ServiceOttawa.,Google Scholar
  26. Kirakosian, Katharine V., Angela Labrador, and Siobhan M. Hart 2011. Report on the 2008 UMass Archaeological Field School Investigations at Area D (19-FR-415), Deerfield, MA. On file at the Massachusetts Historical Commission, Office of the Secretary of State, Boston.Google Scholar
  27. Loren, Diana D. (2008) In Contact: Bodies and Spaces in the Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Eastern Woodlands, AltaMira PressLanham.,Google Scholar
  28. National NAGPRA 2012. NAGPRA Glossary. Accessed at http://www.cr.nps.gov/nagpra/TRAINING/GLOSSARY.HTM, March 2012.
  29. National NAGPRA Program, National Park Service 1999. Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Regulations. Code of Federal Regulations, Vol. 43 CFR Part 10, pp. 194–217.Google Scholar
  30. O’Brien, Jean M. (2010) Firsting and Lasting: Writing Indians out of Existence in New England, University of Minnesota PressMinneapolis.,Google Scholar
  31. O’Callaghan, Edward B. 1853–1887. Documents Relative to the Colonial History of the State of New York. Weed, Parsons and Company, Albany.Google Scholar
  32. Paynter, Robert, Margaret M. Bruchac, Laurie Castonguay, Siobhan M. Hart and Angela Labrador 2007. Summary of Findings Regarding the Cultural Affiliation of Native American Collections from the Middle Connecticut River Valley. Report to the University of Massachusetts Amherst Department of Anthropology Repatriation Committee. On file, Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
  33. Pulsifer, David (ed.) (1859) Records of the Colony of New Plymouth in New England. Acts of the Commissioners of the United Colonies of New EnglandII,, William WhiteBoston.,Google Scholar
  34. Pynchon, John c.1652–1701. Account Books. Six volumes. Connect-icut Valley Historical Museum. Springfield, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  35. Pynchon, William c.1645–1650. Account Book (tran-scribed by John Pynchon). Forbes Library, Northampton, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  36. Salisbury, Neal (1987) Toward the Covenant Chain: Iroquois and Southern New England Algonquians, 1637–1684. In Beyond the Covenant Chain: The Iroquois and Their Indian Neighbors in Indian North America, 1600–1800pp. 61–73, edited by Daniel K Richterand James H Merrell, Syracuse University PressSyracuse.,Google Scholar
  37. Sheldon, George (1895) A History of Deerfield, Massachusetts1,, Pocumtuck Valley Memorial AssociationDeerfield, Massachusetts.,Google Scholar
  38. Sheldon, George 1889. The Pocumtuck Confederacy. In History and Proceedings of the Pocumtuck Valley Memorial Association 1880-1889, Vol. II. Pocumtuck Valley Memorial Association, Deerfield, MA, pp. 390–408.Google Scholar
  39. Speck, Frank G. 1919. The Functions of Wampum Among the Eastern Algonkian. Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association 6:3–71.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, Claire, Wobst, H. Martin (eds.) (2005) Indigenous Archaeologies: Decolonizing Theory and Practice, RoutledgeLondon.,Google Scholar
  41. Temple, Josiah H. (1887) History of North Brookfield, Massachusetts, Town of North BrookfieldBoston.,Google Scholar
  42. Thomas, Peter A. (1985) Cultural Change on the Southern New England Frontier, 1639–1665. In Cultures in Contact: The Impact of European Colonization on Native American Cultural Institutions A.D. 1000–1800pp. 131–161, edited by WW Fitzhugh, Smithsonian Institution PressWashington D.C.,Google Scholar
  43. Thomas, Peter A. (1984) Bridging the Cultural Gap: Indian/White Relations. In Early Settlement in the Connecticut Valleypp. 4–21, edited by Stephen C Innes, Richard I Melvoinand Peter A Thomas, Historic Deerfield, Inc., Institute for Massachusetts Studies, and Westfield State College, WestfieldMassachusetts.,Google Scholar
  44. Thomas, Peter A. (1980) The Riverside District, the WMECO Site, and Suggestions for Archaeological Modeling. In Early and Middle Archaic Cultures in the Northeast, Occasional Publications in Northeastern Anthropology, No. 7pp. 73–95, edited by David Starbuckand Charles E Bolian, Franklin Pierce CollegeRindge, New Hampshire.,Google Scholar
  45. Thomas, Peter A. 1979. In the Maelstrom of Change: The Indian Trade and Cultural Process in the Middle Connecticut River Valley 1635-1665. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
  46. Thwaites, Reuben G. (editor) 1896–1901. The Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents: Travels and Explorations of the Jesuit Missionaries in New France 1610-1791. Seventy-three volumes. The Burrows Brothers, Cleveland.Google Scholar
  47. Turgeon, Laurier 1997. The Tale of the Kettle: Odyssey of an Intercultural Object. Ethnohistory 44(1):1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. van Dongen, Alexandra (1996) The Inexhaustible Kettle. The Metamorphosis of a European Utensil in the World of the North American Indians. In One Man’s Trash is Another Man’s Treasurepp. 115–178, edited by Alexandra van Dongen, Museum Boymans-van BeuningenRotterdam, Netherlands.,Google Scholar
  49. Winthrop, John 1863/1665. Letter to Roger Williams, February 6, 1664/5. Massachusetts Historical Society Collections 4th Series VI(1863):529–532.Google Scholar
  50. Wobst, H. Martin (2010) Indigenous Archaeologies: A Worldwide Perspective on Human Materialities and Human Rights. In Indigenous Archaeologies: A Reader in Decolonizationpp. 19–27, edited by Margaret M Bruchac, Siobhan M Hartand H Martin Wobst, Left Coast PressWalnut Creek.,Google Scholar
  51. Wobst, H. Martin (2005) Power to the (Indigenous) Past and Present! Or: The Theory and Method Behind Archaeological Theory and Method. In Indigenous Archaeologies: Decolonizing Theory and Practicepp. 17–32, edited by Claire Smithand H Martin Wobst, RoutledgeLondon.,Google Scholar
  52. Wobst, H. Martin 2004. Indigenous Archaeologies in World-wide Perspectives: Who Is in Charge and Who Benefits? Paper presented for the 11th Deerfield-Wellesley Symposium, Deerfield, November 4.Google Scholar
  53. Wobst, H. Martin (2000) Agency in (Spite of) Material Culture. In Agency in Archaeologypp. 40–50, edited by M Dobresand J Robb, RoutledgeLondon.,Google Scholar
  54. Wobst, H. Martin (1999) Style in Archaeology or Archaeologists in Style. In Material Meanings: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culturepp. 118–132, edited by ES Chilton, University of Utah PressSalt Lake City.,Google Scholar
  55. Wobst, H. Martin (1977) Stylistic Behavior and Information Exchange. In For the Director: Research Essays in Honor of James B. Griffinpp. 317–342, edited by CE Cleland, University of Michigan Museum of AnthropologyAnn Arbor.,Google Scholar
  56. Woods, J. and Elizabeth S. Chilton 2008. Continuities and Changes in Native Ceramic Technologies in the Middle Connecticut River Valley, Massachusetts. Paper presented at the 107th annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association, November 19–23, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© World Archaeological Congress 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyBinghamton UniversityBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations