, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 197–214 | Cite as

Consensus and the Fringe in American Archaeology

  • Alice B. KehoeEmail author


Is the “consensus of the scientific community” to reject transoceanic diffusion as an explanation for cultural change in the Americas justified by logic, data, or disciplinary politics?


Diffusion Science Fringe archaeology Polynesia Transoceanic contacts 


Le « consensus de la communauté scientifique » pour rejeter la diffusion transocéanique en tant qu’une explication du changement culturel en Amériques est-il justifié par la logique, les données, ou la politique disciplinaire?


Es «consenso de la comunidad científica» rechazar la difusión transoceánica como explicación del cambio cultural en América justificado por la lógica, los datos o la política disciplinaria?

References Cited

  1. Adams, W. Y. (1998) The Philosophical Roots of Anthropology, CSLI PublicationsStanford, CA.,Google Scholar
  2. Altschul, J. H. (2005) Significance in American Cultural Resource Management. In Heritage of Value, Archaeology of Renown: Reshaping Archaeological Assessment, Significancepp. 192–210, edited by C Mathers, T Darvilland BJ Little, University Press of FloridaGainesville.,Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, J. E. 2007. Credit Where Credit is Due: The History of the Chumash Oceangoing Plank Canoes. American Antiquity 72:196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aronowitz, S. (1996) The Politics of the Science Wars. In Science Warspp. 202–225, edited by A Ross, Duke University PressDurham, NC.,Google Scholar
  5. Barber, B. (1952) Science and the Social Order. Free Press, Glencoe IL.Google Scholar
  6. Barnes, B. (2003) Thomas Kuhn and the Problem of Social Order in Science. In Thomas Kuhnpp. 122–141, edited by T Nickles, Cambridge University PressCambridge.,Google Scholar
  7. Barnes, B., Bloor, D., Henry, J. (1996) Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis, University of Chicago PressChicago.,Google Scholar
  8. Bozeman, T. D. (1977) Protestants in an Age of Science, University of North Carolina PressChapel Hill.,Google Scholar
  9. Carneiro, R. L. 1981. Herbert Spencer as an Anthropologist. Journal of Libertarian Studies 5(2):153–210.Google Scholar
  10. Chang, K. C. (1967) Rethinking Archaeology, Random HouseNew York.,Google Scholar
  11. Deetz, J. (1967) Invitation to Archaeology, Natural History PressGarden City, NY.,Google Scholar
  12. Eco, U. 1979 (1976). A Theory of Semiotics. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  13. Ekholm, G. F. 1953. A Possible Focus of Asiatic Influence in the Late Classic Cultures of Mesoamerica. In Asia and North America: Transpacific contacts, edited by Marian W. Smith. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, vol. 9, pp. 72–89.Google Scholar
  14. Ekholm, G. F. (1955) The New Orientation toward Problems of Asiatic-American Relationships. In New Interpretations of Aboriginal American Culture Historypp. 95–109, edited by C Evansand BJ Meggers, Anthropological Society of WashingtonWashington, DC.,Google Scholar
  15. Ekholm, G. F. (1964) Transpacific Contacts. In Prehistoric Man in the New Worldpp. 489–510, edited by JD Jenningsand E Norbeck, University of Chicago PressChicago.,Google Scholar
  16. Feder, K. L. (1990) Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries; Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology, MayfieldMountain View, CA.,Google Scholar
  17. Fingerhut, E. R. (1994) Explorers of Pre-Columbian America? The Diffusionist-Invenionist Controversy, ReginaClaremont, CA.,Google Scholar
  18. Fuller, S. (2000) Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times, University of Chicago PressChicago.,Google Scholar
  19. Gade, D. W. 2004. Diffusion as a Theme in Cultural-Historical Geography. Pre-Columbiana 3:19–39.Google Scholar
  20. Gardin, J.-C., Peebles, C. S. (1992) Representations in Archaeology, Indiana University PressBloomington.,Google Scholar
  21. Goldman, S. L. 1989. Science, Technology and Human Progress, edited by S. L. Goldman, Appendix I. Lehigh University Press, Bethlehem, p. 294.Google Scholar
  22. Gongora, J., Rawlence, N. J., Mobegi, V. A., Jianlin, H., Alcalde, J. A., Matus, J. T., Hanotte, O., Moran, C., Austin, J. J., Ulm, S., Anderson, A. J., Larson, G., Cooper, A. 2008. Indo-European and Asian origins for Chilean and Pacific chickens revealed by mtDNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(30):10308–10313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gould, S. J. (2002) The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, Belknap Press of HarvardCambridge.,Google Scholar
  24. Green, R. C. (1998) Rapahui Origins Prior to European Contact: The View from Eastern Polynesia. In Easter Island and East Polynesian Prehistorypp. 87–110, edited by PV Casanova, Universidad de Chile, Instituto de Estudios Isla de PascuaSantiago.,Google Scholar
  25. Harding, S. (1996) Science is “Good to Think with”. In Science Wars, edited by A. Ross, pp. 16–28. Duke University PressDurham, NC.,Google Scholar
  26. Herman, A. 2001. The Scottish Enlightenment: The Scots’ Invention of the Modern World. Fourth Estate, London (Paperback Edition 2003).Google Scholar
  27. Jett, S. C. (1983) Pre-Columbian Transoceanic Contacts. In Ancient North Americapp. 593–650, edited by JD Jennings, FreemanSan Francisco.,Google Scholar
  28. Jett, S. C. n. d. Manuscript: Book-Length Volume on Transoceanic Contacts.Google Scholar
  29. Jones, T. L., Klar, K. A. 2005. Diffusionism Reconsidered: Linguistic and Archaeological Evidence for Prehistoric Polynesian Contact with Southern California. American Antiquity 70:457–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones, T. L., Klar, K. A. 2009. On Linguistics and Cascading Inventions: A Comment on Arnold’s Dismissal of a Polynesian Contact Event in Southern California. American Antiquity 74:173–182.Google Scholar
  31. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures, Harvard University PressCambridge, MA.,Google Scholar
  32. Kehoe, A. B. (1971) Small Boats Upon the North Atlantic. In Man Across the Seapp. 275–292, edited by CL Riley, JC Kelley, CW Penningtonand RL Rands, University of Texas PressAustin.,Google Scholar
  33. Kehoe, A. B. 1978. Early Civilizations in Asia and Mesoamerica. (Report of 1977 Wenner-Gren conference organized by Kehoe and David H Kelley). Current Anthropology 19(1):204–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kehoe, A. B. (1998) The Land of Prehistory: A Critical History of American Archaeology, RoutledgeNew York.,Google Scholar
  35. Kehoe, A. B. 2003. The Fringe of American Archaeology: Trans-Oceanic and Transcontinental Contacts in Prehistoric America. Journal of Scientific Exploration 16(4):103–120.Google Scholar
  36. Kehoe, A. B. 2005a. The Kensington Runestone: Approaching a Research Question Holistically. Waveland Press, Long Grove, IL.Google Scholar
  37. Kehoe, A. B. 2005b. Wind Jewels and Paddling Gods: The Mississippian Southeast in the Postclassic Mesoamerican World. In Gulf Coast Archaeology, the Southeastern United States and Mexico, edited by N. M. White, pp. 260–280. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  38. Kelley, J. H., and M. P. Hanen. 1988. Archaeology and the Methodology of Science. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
  39. Kempner, J., C. L. Bosk, and J. Merz. 2008. Forbidden Knowledge: The Phenomenology of Scientific Inaction. Paper delivered November 21, 2008 at Center for 21st Century Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  40. Kennedy, R. G. (1994) Hidden Cities: The Discovery and Loss of Ancient North American Civilization, Free PressNew York.,Google Scholar
  41. Klar, K. A., Jones, T. L. 2007. On Myths, Mythmakers, and Post Modern Science: A Comment on Jeanne Arnold’s Dismissal of a Prehistoric Polynesian Contact Event in Southern California. Rapa Nui Journal 22:88–96.Google Scholar
  42. Kuhn, T. S. 1962 (second edition 1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  43. Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things, University of Chicago PressChicago.,Google Scholar
  44. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago PressChicago.,Google Scholar
  45. Latour, B., Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, SageBeverly Hills.,Google Scholar
  46. Lotman, J. M., Uspenskij, B. A., Ivanov, V. V., Toporov, V. N., Pjatigorskij, A. M. (1975) Theses on the Semiotic Study of Cultures (as Applied to Slavic Texts). In The Tell-Tale Signpp. 57–83, edited by TA Sebeok, Peter de Ridder PressLisse.,Google Scholar
  47. McGimsey, C. R. I. I. I. 2003. The Four Fields of Archaeology. American Antiquity 68(4):611–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Merton, R. K. (1973) The Sociology of Science, University of Chicago PressChicago.,Google Scholar
  49. Mirowski, P. (2005) Economics/Philosophy of Science: How Positivism Made a Pact with the Postwar Social Sciences in the United States. In The Politics of Method in the Human Sciencespp. 142–172, edited by G. Steinmetz, Duke University PressDurham, NC.,Google Scholar
  50. Needham, J. 1971. Science and Civilisation in China, vol. 4, pt. 3:540–553 (Navigation). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  51. Needham, J., Gwei-Djen, L. (1985) Trans-Pacific Echoes and Resonances; Listening Once Again, World ScientificSingapore.,Google Scholar
  52. Nersessian, N. J. (2003) Kuhn, Conceptual Change, and Cognitive Science. In Thomas Kuhnpp. 178–211, edited by T Nickles, Cambridge University PressCambridge.,Google Scholar
  53. Nickles, T. (ed.) (2003) Thomas Kuhn, Cambridge University PressCambridge.,Google Scholar
  54. Patterson, T. C. 1995. Toward A Social History of Archaeology in the United States. Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth, TX.Google Scholar
  55. Philips, D. A. Jr., Duke, P., McGuire, R. H., Saita, D. J., Sebastian, L., Wilcox, D. R. 1994. An Open Letter to Southwestern Archaeologists. SAA Bulletin 12(2):3–4.Google Scholar
  56. Polk, M. R. 2002. Private Contracting in Cultural Resources: A Maturing Business. SAA Archaeological Record 3(2):22–24.Google Scholar
  57. Quinn, D. B. (1974) England and the Discovery of America, 1481–1620, Allen and UnwinLondon.,Google Scholar
  58. Salmon, W. C. 1989. Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. In Scientific Explanation, edited by P. Kitcher and W. C. Salmon. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 13, pp. 3–219. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  59. Salmon, M. H., Salmon, W. C. 1979. Alternative Models of Scientific Explanation. American Anthropologist 81(1):61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sebeok, T. A., Eco, U. (eds.) (1983) The Sign of Three, Indiana University PressBloomington.,Google Scholar
  61. Steinmetz, G. 2005a. Introduction: Positivism and Its Others in the Social Sciences. In The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences, edited by G. Steinmetz, pp. 1–56. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  62. Steinmetz, G. 2005b. Sociology. In The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences, edited by G. Steinmetz, pp 275–323. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  63. Stoczkowski, W. 2002. Explaining Human Origins. Translated by M. Turton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Originally Anthropologie Naïve, Anthropologie Savante, 1994, Paris: CRNS Editions).Google Scholar
  64. Stone, P., Mackenzie, R. (eds.) (1989) The Excluded Past, Unwin HymanLondon.,Google Scholar
  65. Storey, A. A., Ramirez, J. M., Quiroz, D., Burley, D. V., Addison, D. J., Walter, R., Anderson, A. J., Hunt, T. L., Athens, J. S., Huynen, L., Matisoo-Smith, E. A. 2007. Radiocarbon and DNA Evidence for a Pre-Columbian Introduction of Polynesian Chickens to Chile. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 104:10335–10339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stout, A. (2008) Creating Prehistory: Druids, Ley Hunters and Archaeologists in Pre-War Britain, BlackwellMalden, MA.,Google Scholar
  67. Tainter, J. A., Bagley, B. (2005) Shaping and Suppressing the Archaeological Record: Significance in American Cultural Resource Management. In Heritage of Value, Archaeology of Renown: Reshaping Archaeological Assessment and Significancepp. 58–73, edited by C Mathers, T Darvilland BJ Little, University Press of FloridaGainesville.,Google Scholar
  68. Trigger, B. G. (1989) A History of Archaeological Thought, Cambridge University PressCambridge.,Google Scholar
  69. von Humboldt, A. 1814. Researches Concerning the Institutions and Monuments of the Ancient Inhabitants of America, with Descriptions and Views of Some of the Most Striking Scenes in the Cordilleras!, translated by H. M. Williams. Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, Brown, Murray and Colburn, London [French Original, 1811].Google Scholar
  70. Watson, P. J., LeBlanc, S. A., Redman, C. L. (1971) Explanation in Archaeology: An Explicitly Scientific Approach, Columbia University PressNew York.,Google Scholar
  71. Watson, P. J., LeBlanc, S. A., Redman, C. L. (1984) Archeological Explanation: The Scientific Method in Archeology, Columbia University PressNew York.,Google Scholar
  72. White, L. A. (1959) The Evolution of Culture, McGraw-HillNew York.,Google Scholar
  73. Williams, S. (1991) Fantastic Archaeology, University of Pennsylvania PressPhiladelphia.,Google Scholar
  74. Wylie, A. (2002) Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology, University of California PressBerkeley.,Google Scholar
  75. Zammito, J. H. (2004) A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Post-Positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour, University of Chicago PressChicago.,Google Scholar

Copyright information

© World Archaeological Congress 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations