Archaeologies

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 346–371

Drowned Memories: The Submerged Places of the Winnemem Wintu

Research

Abstract

This article is a brief overview of an instance where landscape inundation has disconnected culture from place. The Winnemem Wintu, a Native American tribe in Northern California, had most of their ancestral landscape along the McCloud River submerged by the construction of Shasta Dam just after World War II. The tribe’s remaining traditional cultural properties are under continual threat of loss and/or destruction, leaving the tribe’s ability to practice traditional ceremonies crippled by legal battles and fights against the continual assertion of United States hegemonic power over tribal cultural identity. As part of archaeological research on these submerged places, the tribe’s spiritual leader, Caleen Sisk-Franco, and Tribal Headman, Mark Franco, spoke with the author about these threats and how their culture must adapt to meet them.

keywords

Winnemem Wintu Underwater archaeology Submerged cultural resources Dams Cultural geography Cultural tradition Landscape Place California 

Résumé

Cet article est une brève vue d’ensemble d’un exemple dans lequel l’inondation du territoire a interrompu la culture du lieu. Les Winnemen Wintu, sont une tribu amérindienne du nord de la Californie, dont la plupart de ses territoires ancestraux le long de la rivière McCloud, ont été immergés lors de la construction du barrage Shasta peu après la deuxième guerre mondiale. Ainsi ces propriétés traditionnelles et culturelles de la tribu sont soumises aux perpétuelles menaces de l’oubli et/ou de la destruction, étant également paralysées par les conflits et les poursuites juridiques contre l’hégémonie du gouvernement des Etats-Unis a propos de l’identité culturelle tribale qui rendent difficile la pratique des cérémonies traditionnelles. Partie intégrante de la recherche archéologique sur ces territoires immergés, le leader spirituel de la tribu, Caleen Sisk-Franco, et le chef de tribu, Mark Franco, parlent de ces menaces avec l’auteur et de la manière dont leur culture doit s’adapter pour y faire face.

Resumen

El presente artículo presenta brevemente un caso en que la inundación del paisaje ha desconectado la cultura del lugar. La Winnemem Wintu, una tribu Americana nativa del norte de California, vio cómo la mayor parte de su paisaje ancestral a lo largo río McCloud quedó sumergida por la construcción de la presa de Shasta justo después de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. El resto de propiedades culturales de la tribu sufre continuas amenazas de pérdida y destrucción, mermando la capacidad de la tribu para practicar sus ceremonias tradicionales debido a que tienen que enzarzarse en batallas y luchas jurídicas contra la continua afirmación del poder hegemónico de los Estados Unidos sobre la identidad cultural tribal. Dentro de las investigaciones arqueológicas de estos lugares sumergidos, el líder espiritual de la tribu, Caleen Sisk-Franco y el jefe tribal Mark Franco, hablaron con el autor sobre estas amenazas y de cómo su cultura debe aprender a adaptarse a ellas.

References Cited

  1. Adovasio, J.M., J. Donahue, W.C. Johnson, J.P. Marwitt, R.C. Carlisle, J.D. Applegarth, P.T. Fitzgibbons, and J.D. Yedlowski 1980. An inundation study of three sites in the Bluestone Reservoir, Summers County, West Virginia. In The final report of the national reservoir inundation study volume II, edited by D.J. Lenihan.Google Scholar
  2. Advisory Council for Historic Preservation 1993. National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. Washington D.C. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, D.G., B.C. Keel, J.H. Jameson, J.F. Cobb, and J.W. Joseph 2007. Reservoir construction in the Southeastern United States: the Richard B. Russell project as an example of exemplary heritage/resource management. In Damming the Past: Cultural Heritage Management and Dams in Global Perspective, edited by S. Brandt and F. Hassan. Lexington Books, Lanham.Google Scholar
  4. Ashmore, W. and A. Knapp 1999 Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives, Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Basso, K. 1996. Wisdom Sits in Places. In Senses of Place, edited by Keith Basso, pp. 13–52. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
  6. Bender, B. 1992. Theorising Landscapes, and the Prehistoric Landscapes of Stonehenge. Man. 27: 735–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bender, B. 1993. Landscapes: Politics and Perspective. Berg Publishers, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  8. Binford, L. 1962. Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 217-225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrell, T., S. Rayl and D. Lenihan 1976. The Effects of Freshwater Inundation of Archaeological Sites through Reservoir Construction : Literature Search. United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resources Management Division, Archaeology, Washington.Google Scholar
  10. Casey, E.S. 1996. How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: phenomenological prolegomena. In Senses of Place, edited by Keith Basso, pp. 13–52. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  11. CLUI 2005. Immersed Remains Exhibit. Center for Land Use Interpretation, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  12. Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. 2006. Dreams at the Edge of the World and Other Evocations of O’Odham History. Archaeologies: The Journal of the World Archaeology Congress Vol. 2 No. 1 pp. 20-44.Google Scholar
  13. Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. and T.J. Ferguson 2006. Memory Pieces and Footprints: Multivocality and the Meanings of Ancient Times and Ancestral Places among the Zuni and Hopi. American Anthropologist, March 2006, Vol. 108, No. 1, pp. 148-162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cresswell, T. 2004. Place: A Short Introduction. Blackwell Publishing. Malden, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  15. Cummings, C.H. 2004. The Winnemem Wintu: Waging war on Shasta Dam. Earth First! Journal (November-December 2004).Google Scholar
  16. Downer, A.S., and A. Roberts 1993. Traditional Cultural Properties, Cultural Resources Management, and Environmental Planning. CRM 16(Special Issue):12–14.Google Scholar
  17. Du Bois, C. 1935. Wintu Ethnography. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  18. Duncan, J.S., and D. Ley 1993. Place/Culture/Representation. Routledge, London United Kigdom.Google Scholar
  19. Ferguson, T.J. 1996. Anthropological Archaeology Conducted by Tribes: Traditional Cultural Properties and Cultural Affiliation. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 2003, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 137-144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisher, P. and D. Unwin 2002. Virtual Reality in Geography (Geographic Information Systems Workshop). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  21. Flatman, J. 2003. Cultural Biographies, Cognitive Landscapes and Dirty Old Bits of Boat: ‘Theory’ in Maritime Archaeology. The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, vol. 32, pp. 143-157.Google Scholar
  22. Forbes, J.D. 1969. Native Americans of California and Nevada. Naturegraph Publishers, Happy Camp, California.Google Scholar
  23. Foster, J.W., J.C. Bingham, C. Carter, K. Cooley-Reynolds, and J.L. Kelly 1977. The effect of inundation on the Pedersen Site, CA:ELD:201 Folsom Lake, California. On file with California State Parks and Recreation Department.Google Scholar
  24. Franco, M., and C. Sisk-Franco 2002. Winnemem Wintu position regarding Shasta Dam. Prepared for the Senate Selection Committee Hearings in Washington DC, June 4th, 2002, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  25. Franco, M. 2009. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  26. Fredrickson, D.A., J.L. Cox, V.D. Kaplan, S.M. Patterson and S.A. Stoddard 1977. The Effects of Freshwater Immersion on Cultural Resources of the Coyote Dam-Lake Mendocino Project Area, Ukiah, California. US Bureau of Reclamation, Denver Office Library.Google Scholar
  27. Fullwood, J. 2002. ‘Journey to Justice’ Tells Poignant Tale of Almost-Forgotten California Tribe. Canku Ota, Issue 64.Google Scholar
  28. Gillespie, S.D. and D.L. Nichols. 2003. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association (AP3A number 13). University of California Press. Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  29. Goggin, J.M. 1960. Underwater Archaeology: Its Nature and Limitations. American Antiquity 25: 348–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gosden, C. 1999. Anthropology and Archaeology: A Changing Relationship. Routledge Press, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  31. Guthry, W. 1998. Washington Talkin’ Blues. Columbia River Collection. Rounder Recordings, Burlington, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  32. Holtorf, C. 2005. From Stonehenge to Las Vegas: Archaeology as Popular Culture. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.Google Scholar
  33. Ingold, T. 1993. The Temporality of the Landscape. World Archaeology 25(2):24–174.Google Scholar
  34. King, T. 2002. Thinking about Cultural Resource Management: Essays from the Edge. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.Google Scholar
  35. Lenihan, D. 1977. The Preliminary Report of the National Reservoir Inundation Study. United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Southwest Cultural Resources Center, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
  36. Lenihan, D., T.L. Carell, S. Fosberg, L. Murphy, S.L. Rahl and J.A. Ware 1981a The Final Report of the National Reservoir Inundation Study, Vol. I. United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Southwest Cultural Resources Center: Santa Fe.Google Scholar
  37. Lenihan, D., T.L. Carell, S. Fosberg, L. Murphy, S.L. Rahl and J.A. Ware 1981b The Final Report of the National Reservoir Inundation Study, Vol. II. United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Southwest Cultural Resources Center: Santa Fe.Google Scholar
  38. Massey, D. 1994. Space, Place, and Gender. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  39. McLeod, C. 2000. In the Light of Reverence. Sacred Land Film Project of Earth Island Institute, Bullfrog Films DVD 73 Min.Google Scholar
  40. Melley, B. 2004. Indian Tribe Conducts First War Dance Since 1887 to Stop Expansion of California’s Shasta Dam. San Francisco Gate, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  41. Murphy, D.E. 2004. At War Against Dam, Tribe Turns to Old Ways. New York Times, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  42. Norton, J. 1979. When Our Worlds Cried: Genocide in Northwestern California. The Indian Historian Press, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  43. Oliver-Smith, A. 2007. Cultural Heritage, Dams and Displacement: Conflicting Discourses. In Damming the Past: Cultural Heritage Management and Dams in Global Perspective, edited by S. Brandt and F. Hassan. Lexington Books, Lanham.Google Scholar
  44. Parker, P.L., and T.F. King 1992. Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties, National Register Bulletin 38. Interagency Resource Division, National Park Service. Washington DC Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  45. Polish, M. 2003. Northfork. Paramount Classics, DVD 103 Min.Google Scholar
  46. Pred, A. 1984. Place as Historically Contingent Process: Structuration and the Time-Geography of Becoming Places in Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 74, 1984, pp. 279-297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pritzker, B. 2000. A Native American Encyclopedia, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Ritscher, A. 2004. Native Americans Fight Shasta Dam Expansion in Socialist Action. San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  49. Ross, K. 2006a. Right of Passage, Teen Girl Undergoes Tribal Coming of Age Ceremony. Redding Record Searchlight. Redding, CA.Google Scholar
  50. Ross, K. 2006b. Ceremony Needs Space, Public Asked to Respect Voluntary Closure in Forest. Redding Record Searchlight. Redding, CA.Google Scholar
  51. Sisk-Franco, C. 2005. Interview with the International Centre for Archaeology Underwater. Redding, California.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, C.E., and W.D. Weymouth 1952. Archaeology of the Shasta Dam area. University of California Press, California.Google Scholar
  53. Smith, L. 2004. Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage. Routledge, London, United Kingdom.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Solnit, R. 2000. Wanderlust, A History of Walking. Penguin Group, New York.Google Scholar
  55. Stoffle, R.W., D.B. Halmo and D.E. Austin 1997. Cultural Landscapes and Traditional Cultural Properties: A Southern Paiute View of the Grand Canyon and Colorado River in American Indian Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 229-249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trigger, B. 1995. Romanticism, Nationalism, and Archaeology. In Nationalism, Politics and the Practice of Archaeology, edited by P.L. Kohl and C. Fawcett. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  57. Tuan, Y.F. 2000. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  58. Ucko P. and R. Layton, 1999. The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape: Shaping Your Landscape. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  59. Willey, G., P. Phillips, R.L. Lyman and Michael J.O. 2001. Method and Theory in American Archeology. University Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  60. World Commission on Dams 2000. Dams and Development: a New Framework for Decision Making World Commission on Dams. Earthscan Publication Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  61. Yamin R. and K.B. Metheny, 1996. Landscape Archaeology: Reading and Interpreting the American Historical Landscape. University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© World Archaeological Congress 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyRoyal Holloway, University of LondonEgham, SurreyUK

Personalised recommendations