Advertisement

Archaeologies

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 144–163 | Cite as

‘Indigenous Knowledge’ and ‘Science’: Reframing the Debate on Knowledge Diversity

  • Lesley J. F. Green
Research

Abstract

Responding to Kai Horsthemke’s call for the valorisation of universal knowledge within the debate on indigenous knowledge, the paper argues for an understanding of knowledge that is based neither universalism nor relativism. Arguing against the dualisms of ‘indigenous knowledge’ and ‘science’, the paper proposes that the debate be focused rather on knowledge diversity. Drawing on the work of Nelson Goodman and Catherine Elgin, the paper argues that diverse epistemologies ought to be evaluated not on their capacity to express a strict realism but on their ability to advance understanding. Such an approach allows for the evaluation of the advancement of understanding without necessarily requiring the expression of the literal truths that divide ‘belief’ from ‘knowledge’.

Keywords

Indigenous knowledge Science Knowledge diversity Epistemology Secularism Power 

Resumen

Respondiendo a la valorización del conocimiento universal exhortada por Kai Horsthemke en el marco del debate sobre conocimiento indígena, este artículo discute un entendimiento de conocimiento que no está basado en el relativismo ni en el universalismo. Argumentando en contra de las dualidades entre “conocimiento indígena” y “ciencia”, el trabajo propone que el debate más bien se centre en la diversidad del conocimiento. Tomando del trabajo de Nelson Goodman y Catherine Elgin, este artículo sostiene que la diversidad de epistemologías debe ser evaluada no en términos de su capacidad para expresar un realismo estricto, sino en su capacidad para promover la comprensión. Este enfoque permite evaluar el avance del entendimiento sin requerir necesariamente la expresión de verdades literales que separan “creencia” de “conocimiento”.

Résumé

En réponse à l’appel de Kai Horsthemke pour la valorisation de la connaissance universelle, en lien avec le débat sur la connaissance autochtone, cet article argumente en faveur d’une compréhension de la connaissance basée sur l’universalité et le relativisme. En argumentant contre le dualisme de la connaissance autochtone et de la science, cet article propose que le débat soit plutôt centré sur la diversité de la connaissance. En s’inspirant du travail de Nelson Goodman et Catherine Elgin, cet article propose que diverses épistémologies méritent d’être évaluées selon leur habilité à améliorer la compréhension, plutôt que selon leur capacité à exprimer la stricte réalité. Ce type d’approche permet d’évaluer la progression de la compréhension sans nécessairement exiger l’expression de la vérité exacte qui divise la « croyance » de la « connaissance ».

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the Henry Louis Gates Jr. and the WEB du Bois Institute at Harvard University for a Mandela Fellowship that allowed the opportunity to develop this area of research in 2005–2006. Thanks are also due to the Smithsonian Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage where a Rockefeller Fellowship enabled this project to begin. Particular thanks are due to Catherine Elgin, Gary Urton, Jane Anderson, Sita Reddy, and David Turnbull.

References Cited

  1. Agrawal A. 1995 Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge. Development and Change 26:413–439Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal A. 2002 Indigenous Knowledge and the Politics of Classification. International Social Science Journal 173:287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appiah, K.A. 2005. African Studies and the Concept of Knowledge. In Knowledge Cultures: Comparative Western and African Epistemology, edited by. B. Hamminga. Rodopi Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. Asad T. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball M.W. 2002 People Speaking Silently to Themselves: An Examination of Keith Basso’s Philosophical Speculations on “Sense of Place” in Apache Cultures. American Indian Quarterly 26(3):460–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berger P.L. (editor) 1999. The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics. William B. Eerdmans, Grand RapidsGoogle Scholar
  7. Cannell, F. 2005. The Christianity of Anthropology. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 11:335–356Google Scholar
  8. Chapin, M. 2004. A Challenge to Conservationists. Worldwatch Magazine. December 2004Google Scholar
  9. Cohen L.J. 1995 An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Coplan D. 1994 In the Time of Cannibals. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. De Pina-Cabral, J. 2001. Three Points on Secularism and Anthropology. In Secularism: Personal Values and Professional Evaluations. Social Anthropology 9(3):329–333Google Scholar
  12. Department of Science and Technology, Republic of South Africa 2004. Indigenous Knowledge Systems Policy. Department of Science and Technology, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  13. Dove M.R. 2006 Indigenous People and Environmental Politics. Annual Review of Anthropology 35:191–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Du Toit C.W. 2004. The Environmental Integrity of African Indigenous Knowledge Systems: Probing the Roots of African Rationality. Indilinga 4(1):55–71Google Scholar
  15. Elgin C.Z. 1996 Considered Judgment. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  16. Elgin, C.Z. 2004. True Enough. In Epistemology, edited by E. Sosa and E. Villaneuva. Blackwell Publishing, BostonGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellen R. 2004 From Ethno-Science to Science, or “What the Indigenous Knowledge Debate Tells us About how Scientists Define Their Project. Journal of Cognition and Culture 4(3):409–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellis, G. 2006. Academic Life and Holistic Viewpoints. Unpublished notes from a Talk. University of Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  19. Fairall A. 2002 Starwatching: A Southern Hemisphere Guide to the Galaxy. Struik, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, edited by C. Gordon. Pantheon Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Gegeo D.W., Watson-Gegeo K.A. 2001 How We Know: Kwara’ae Rural Villagers Doing Indigenous Epistemology. The Contemporary Pacific 13(1):55–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodman N. 1978 Ways of Worldmaking. Hackett Publishing Company, IndianaGoogle Scholar
  23. Green L.J.F. 2005 “Ba pi ai?”—Rethinking the Relationship Between Secularism and Professionalism in Anthropological Fieldwork. Anthropology Southern Africa 28(3&4):91–98Google Scholar
  24. Haack S. 1993. Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Haack S. 2003 Defending Science—within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism. Prometheus Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Hall D. 2001. Just how Provincial is Western Philosophy? “Truth” in Comparative Context. Social Epistemology 15(4):285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hester L., Cheney J. 2001. Truth and Native American Epistemology. Social Epistemology 15(4):319–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horton R. 1993. Patterns of Thought in Africa and the West. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Ingold T. 2000 The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Kalland, A. 2003. Indigenous Knowledge: Prospects and Limitations. In Indigenous Environmental Knowledge and its Transformations, edited by R. Ellen, P. Parkes, and A. Bicker. Harwood Academic Publishers, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  31. Kapferer B. 2001. Anthropology: The Paradox of the Secular. Social Anthropology 9(3):341–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Latour B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Latour B. 2004. Politics of Nature. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Mbeki, T. 1998. Reconciliation and Nation Building. Statement of Deputy President Thabo Mbeki at the Opening of the Debate in the National Assembly, Cape Town, 29 May 1998’. URL: http://www.dfa.gov.za/docs/speeches/1998/mbek0529.htm. Accessed November 5, 2005
  35. McCarty T.L., Borgoiakova T., et al. 2005. ‘Editors’ Introduction: Indigenous Epistemologies and Education—Self-determination, Anthropology and Human Rights. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 36(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nadasdy P. 2004 Hunters and Bureaucrats. University of British Columbia Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  37. Nazarea V. 2006 Local Knowledge and Memory in Biodiversity Conservation. Annual Review of Anthropology 35:317–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Odora-Hoppers, C. 1999. Indigenous Knowledge and the Integration of Knowledge Systems: Toward a Conceptual and Methodological Framework. A Discussion Document for the Human Sciences Research Council Corporate Project on a Comparative Study of the Development, Integration and Protection of Knowledge Systems in the Third World’. Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria. URL: http://www.dst.gov.za/programmes/indigenous_knowledge/iksdoc.pdf. Accessed Nov 11, 2005
  39. Overing J. 1990 The Shaman as a Maker of Worlds: Nelson Goodman in the Amazon’. Man 25(4):602–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pickering A. 1992 Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  41. Posey, D.A. 2000. Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity. Intermediate Technology PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  42. Posey, D.A. 2001. Intellectual Property Rights and the Sacred Balance: Some Spiritual Consequences from the Commercialization of Traditional Resources. In Indigenous Traditions and Ecology: The Interbeing of Cosmology and Community, edited by J.A. Grim. Harvard University Press/Center for the Study of World Religions, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Posey D.A. 2002 Kayapo Ethnoecology and Culture. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Posey, D.A., and G. Dutfield 1996. Beyond Intellectual Property: Toward Traditional Resource Rights for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. (IDRC)Google Scholar
  45. Posey D.A., Plenderleith K. 2004. Indigenous Knowledge and Ethics: A Darrell Posey Reader. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Posey D.A., Balick M.J. 2006. Human Impacts on Amazonia: The Role of Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Conservation and Development. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Sontag S. 2001 Illness as Metaphor/Aids and its Metaphors. Picador, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Spiegel, A., and E. Boonzaier 1988. Promoting Tradition: Images of the South African Past. In South African Keywords: The Uses and Abuses of Political Concepts, edited by E. Boonzaaier and J. Sharp. David Phillip, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  49. Stewart C. 2001. Secularism as an Impediment to Anthropological Research, Social Anthropology. 93:325–328Google Scholar
  50. Stoller P., Olkes C. 1989. In Sorcery’s Shadow: A Memoir of Apprenticeship Among the Songhay of Niger. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  51. Sundar N. 2002. “Indigenise, Nationalise and Spiritualise”—An Agenda for Education? International Social Science Journal 173:373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tambiah S.J. 1990. Magic, Science, Religion, and the Scope of Rationality. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Thornton, R. 1988. Culture: A Contemporary Definition. In South African Keywords: The Uses and Abuses of Political Concepts. edited by E. Boonzaaier and J. Sharp. David Phillip, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  54. Valladolid, J., and F. Apffel-Marglin 2001. Andean Cosmovision and the Nurturing of Biodiversity. Indigenous Traditions and Ecology: The Interbeing of Cosmology and Community, edited by E. Boonzaaier and J. Sharp. Harvard University Press/Center for the Study of World Religions, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  55. Wreford J. 2005. Missing Each Other: Problems and Potential for Collaborative Efforts Between Biomedicine and Traditional Healers in South Africa in the time of AIDS. Social Dynamics 31(2):55–89Google Scholar

Copyright information

© World Archaeological Congress 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social AnthropologyUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations