Advertisement

Heimaufenthalt in der Kindheit und Rückfallrisiko für Sexualdelinquenz im Erwachsenenalter: Mediieren potenziell traumatisierende Kindheitserfahrungen den Zusammenhang?

  • Franziska BrunnerEmail author
  • Elisabeth Stück
  • Dahlnym Yoon
  • Martin Rettenberger
  • Peer Briken
Originalarbeit

Zusammenfassung

Das Ziel der Studie bestand darin, unter Verwendung eines retrospektiven Forschungsdesigns den Zusammenhang zwischen einem Heimaufenthalt in der Kindheit und dem aktuellen Rückfallrisiko für erneute Sexualstraftaten zu untersuchen. Es wurde geprüft, ob dabei dem Erleben unterschiedlicher potenziell traumatisierender Kindheitserfahrungen (sexueller Missbrauch, körperliche Misshandlung, emotionale Vernachlässigung) eine vermittelnde Rolle zukommt. Die Stichprobe setzte sich aus 159 männlichen Sexualstraftätern zusammen, die zwischen 2010 und 2018 in der Sozialtherapeutischen Anstalt Hamburg (SothA-HH) inhaftiert waren. Die verwendeten Daten basieren auf Akteninformationen (u. a. Urteil, Bundeszentralregisterauszüge, Gutachten) und semistrukturierten Interviews. In dieser Studie wurden zwei Risikoinstrumente zur Erfassung des relativen Rückfallrisikos für erneute Sexualstraftaten verwendet: Static-99 zu Erfassung statischer, weitestgehend unveränderbarer Risikofaktoren und Stable-2007 zur Erfassung stabil-dynamischer Risikofaktoren, d.h. veränderbare Faktoren, die ohne therapeutische Interventionen relativ stabil bleiben. Die Gruppe mit einem Heimaufenthalt in der Kindheit wies einen niedrigeren sozioökonomischen Status, eine höhere Anzahl familiärer Risikofaktoren sowie eine frühere und stärker delinquente Entwicklung auf. Zudem erzielte sie ein höheres Rückfallrisiko. Für das stabil-dynamische, nicht jedoch für das statische Risiko wurde dieser Zusammenhang durch den kumulativen Effekt der Anzahl unterschiedlicher potenziell traumatisierender Kindheitserfahrungen vermittelt. Damit bestätigen die Ergebnisse der vorliegenden Studie vorherige Befunde zum Zusammenhang von Heimaufenthalt und Delinquenz. Darüber hinaus verdeutlicht die vermittelnde Rolle potenziell traumatisierender Kindheitserfahrungen: Je mehr negativen Kindheitserfahrungen die Teilnehmer ausgesetzt waren, desto höher war das stabil-dynamische Rückfallrisiko. Diese Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass ein erheblicher Anteil von inhaftierten Sexualstraftätern, die negativen Kindheitserfahrungen ausgesetzt und im Kinderheim untergebracht waren, ein höheres Rückfallrisiko aufweisen und im Erwachsenenalter einer besonderen Betreuung und Kontrolle bedürfen.

Schlüsselwörter

Kinderheim Sexueller Missbrauch Körperliche Misshandlung Emotionale Vernachlässigung; Sexualstraftäter 

Placement in a children’s home in childhood and risk of recidivism for sexual delinquency in adulthood: do potentially traumatic childhood experiences mediate the association?

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to retrospectively examine if children’s home foster care has an impact on the risk of recidivism for sexual delinquency and if the number of domains of adverse childhood experiences (sexual abuse, physical violence and emotional neglect) mediates the association. The cohort consisted of 159 male sexual offenders serving sentences at the social therapeutic correctional facility of the Hamburg correctional services (SothA-HH) between 2010 and 2018. Data were collected from pretreatment ratings within the first weeks after admission to the SothA-HH. All data were derived from case file information (e. g., criminal records, court files and psychological reports) and from semi-structured one-to-one interviews. In this study two instruments were used for assessing the relative risk of sexual reoffending: Static-99 for current, mostly unchangeable risk factors and Stable-2007 for stable-dynamic risk factors, i.e. factors that are changeable but relatively stable without therapeutic treatment. The group with children’s home care experiences had a lower socioeconomic status, more familial risk factors as well as an early onset and a more severe criminal career. Furthermore, they had a higher risk of recidivism. For the stable-dynamic risk, this relationship was mediated by the cumulative effect of the number of domains of adverse childhood experiences but no significant mediation was found for the current risk. This study substantiates previous findings on the relationship between children’s home care and delinquent development. Beyond that, the mediating role of the number of domains of adverse childhood experiences shows that the more adverse childhood experiences the participants were exposed to, the higher the risk of stable-dynamic recidivism. These findings indicate that a large number of incarcerated sexual offenders who had adverse childhood experiences and have been in foster care have a higher risk of recidivism and need to be particularly monitored and controlled as adults.

Keywords

Foster care Sexual abuse Physical abuse Emotional neglect Sexual offender 

Notes

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt

F. Brunner, E. Stück, D. Yoon, M. Rettenberger und P. Briken geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Ethische Standards

Alle beschriebenen Untersuchungen am Menschen wurden mit Zustimmung der zuständigen Ethik-Kommission, im Einklang mit nationalem Recht sowie gemäß der Deklaration von Helsinki von 1975 (in der aktuellen, überarbeiteten Fassung) durchgeführt. Von allen beteiligten Patienten liegt eine Einverständniserklärung vor.

Literatur

  1. Alltucker KW, Bullis M, Close D, Yovanoff P (2006) Different pathways to juvenile delinquency: characteristics of early and late starters in a sample of previously incarcerated youth. J Child Fam Stud 15(4):479–492.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-006-9032-2 Google Scholar
  2. Anda RF, Butchart A, Felitti VJ, Brown DW (2010) Building a framework for global surveillance of the public health implications of adverse childhood experiences. Am J Prev Med 39(1):93–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.015 Google Scholar
  3. Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Bremner JD, Walker JD, Whitfield C, Perry BD, Dube SR, Giles WH (2006) The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood. A convergence of evidence from neurobiology and epidemiology. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 256(3):174–186.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-005-0624-4 Google Scholar
  4. Barnett OW, Miller-Perrin CL, Perrin RD (2011) Family violence across the lifespan: an introduction, 3. Aufl. SAGE, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182Google Scholar
  6. Binggeli NJ, Hart SN, Brassard MR (2001) Psychological maltreatment of children. SAGE, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandford C, English D (2004) Foster youth transition to independence study. Office of Children’s Administration Research, Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  8. Brunner F, Yoon D, Rettenberger M, Briken P (2016) Kriminologische und kriminalprognostische Merkmale der Insassen der Sozialtherapeutischen Anstalt Hamburg. Recht Psychiatr 34(4):221–227Google Scholar
  9. Campbell MA, Porter S, Santor D (2004) Psychopathic traits in adolescent offenders: an evaluation of criminal history, clinical, and psychosocial correlates. Behav Sci Law 22(1):23–47.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.572 Google Scholar
  10. Cicchetti D, Banny A (2014) A developmental psychopathology perspective on child maltreatment. In: Lewis M, Rudolph KD (Hrsg) Handbook of developmental psychopathology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, S 723–741  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199505000-00008 Google Scholar
  11. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112(1):155–159Google Scholar
  12. Coulton C, Crampton D, Cho Y, Kim S‑J (2015) Policy research brief. Effects of foster care and juvenile justice involvement on early adult outcomes: a study of cleveland’s youth. Center on Urban Poverty and Community Development Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Cleveland, S 1–25Google Scholar
  13. Courtney ME, Dworsky A, Lee JS, Raap M (2010) Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of former foster youth: outcomes at ages 23 and 24. Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago, Chicago, S 1097–3125Google Scholar
  14. Curtis GC (1963) Violence breeds violence—perhaps? Am J Psychiatry 120(4):386–387Google Scholar
  15. DeGue S, Widom CS (2009) Does out-of-home placement mediate the relationship between child maltreatment and adult criminality? Child Maltreat 14(4):344–355.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559509332264 Google Scholar
  16. Doyle JJ (2007) Child protection and child outcomes: measuring the effects of foster care. Am Econ Rev 97(5):1583–1610.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.5.1583 Google Scholar
  17. Doyle JJ (2008) Child protection and adult crime: using investigator assignment to estimate causal effects of foster care. J Polit Econ 116(4):746–770.  https://doi.org/10.1086/590216 Google Scholar
  18. Dregan A, Gulliford MC (2012) Foster care, residential care and public care placement patterns are associated with adult life trajectories: population-based cohort study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 47(9):1517–1526.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-011-0458-5 Google Scholar
  19. Duke NN, Pettingell SL, McMorris BJ, Borowsky IW (2010) Adolescent violence perpetration: associations with multiple types of adverse childhood experiences. Pediatr Electron Pages:779–786.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0597 Google Scholar
  20. Eher R, Matthes A, Schilling F, Haubner-MacLean T, Rettenberger M (2012) Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: an investigation of predictive and incremental validity. Sex Abuse 24(1):5–28.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211403164 Google Scholar
  21. English DJ, Widom CS, Brandford C (2002) Childhood victimization and delinquency, adult criminality, and violent criminal behavior: a replication and extension. Final report presented to the US National Institute of Justice, National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/192291.pdf
  22. Etzler S, Eher R, Rettenberger M (2018) Dynamic risk assessment of sexual offenders: validity and dimensional structure of the stable-2007. Assessment.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118754705 Google Scholar
  23. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41(4):1149–1160.  https://doi.org/10.3758/Brm.41.4.1149 Google Scholar
  24. Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, Williamson DF, Spitz AM, Edwards V, Koss MP, Marks JS (1998) Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med 14(4):245–258Google Scholar
  25. Fernandez Y, Harris AJ, Hanson RK, Sparks J (2012) Stable-2007 coding manual revised 2012. Public Safety Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  26. Hare RD (2003) Manual for the revised psychopathy checklist, 2. Aufl. Multi-Health Systems, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris A, Phenix A, Thornton D, Hanson RK (2003) Static 99: coding rules revised 2003. Solicitor General Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  28. Harris DA, Knight RA, Smallbone S, Dennison S (2011) Postrelease specialization and versatility in sexual offenders referred for civil commitment. Sex Abuse 23(2):243–259Google Scholar
  29. Häuser W, Schmutzer G, Brähler E, Glaesmer H (2011) Misshandlungen in Kindheit und Jugend: Ergebnisse einer Umfrage in einer repräsentativen Stichprobe der deutschen Bevölkerung. Dtsch Arztebl 108(17):287–294Google Scholar
  30. Hayes AF (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr 76(4):408–420Google Scholar
  31. Huang H, Ryan JP, Rhoden M‑A (2016) Foster care, geographic neighborhood change, and the risk of delinquency. Child Youth Serv Rev 65:32–41Google Scholar
  32. Jespersen AF, Lalumière ML, Seto MC (2009) Sexual abuse history among adult sex offenders and non-sex offenders: a meta-analysis. Child Abuse Negl 33:179–192Google Scholar
  33. Jonson-Reid M, Barth RP (2000a) From maltreatment report to juvenile incarceration: the role of child welfare services. Child Abuse Negl 24(4):505–520Google Scholar
  34. Jonson-Reid M, Barth RP (2000b) From Placement to Prison: The Path to Adolescent Incarceration from Child Welfare Supervised Foster or Group Care. Child Youth Serv Rev 22(7):493–516Google Scholar
  35. van der Kolk BA (2006) Clinical Implications of Neuroscience Research in PTSD. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1071(1):277–293Google Scholar
  36. Lee JS, Courtney ME, Tajima E (2014) Extended foster care support during the transition to adulthood: effect on the risk of arrest. Child Youth Serv Rev 42:34–42Google Scholar
  37. Levenson JS, Socia KM (2016) Adverse childhood experiences and arrest patterns in a sample of sexual offenders. J Interpers Violence 31(10):1883–1911Google Scholar
  38. Li D, Chu CM, Goh JTL, Ng IYH, Zeng G (2015) Impact of childhood maltreatment on recidivism in youth offenders: a matched-control study. Crim Justice Behav 42(10):990–1007Google Scholar
  39. Lindberg N, Laajasalo T, Holi M, Putkonen H, Weizmann-Henelius G, Häkkänen-Nyholm H (2009) Psychopathic traits and offender characteristics—a nationwide consecutive sample of homicidal male adolescents. BMC Psychiatry 9(1):18Google Scholar
  40. Matthes A, Rettenberger M, Eher R (2012) Deutsche Übersetzung und Bearbeitung des Stable-2007 Coding Manual Revised 2012. Institut für Gewaltforschung und Prävention, WienGoogle Scholar
  41. McFarlane K (2017) Care-criminalisation: The involvement of children in out-of-home care in the New South Wales criminal justice system. Aust N Z J Criminol 51:412.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865817723954 Google Scholar
  42. McMahon J, Clay-Warner J (2002) Child abuse and future criminality: the role of social service placement, family disorganization, and gender. J Interpers Violence 17(9):1002–1019Google Scholar
  43. Patterson GR, DeBaryshe B, Ramsey E (1989) A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. Am Psychol 44:329–335Google Scholar
  44. Reckdenwald A, Mancini C, Beauregard E (2013) The cycle of violence: examining the impact of maltreatment early in life on adult offending. Violence Vict 28(3):466–482Google Scholar
  45. Rettenberger M, Eher R (2006) Die deutsche Übersetzung des Static-99 zur aktuarischen Kriminalprognose verurteilter Sexualstraftäter. Monatsschr Kriminol Strafrechtsreform 89(5):352Google Scholar
  46. Rettenberger M, Haubner-MacLean T, Eher R (2013) The contribution of age to the static-99 risk assessment in a population-based prison sample of sexual offenders. Crim Justice Behav 40(12):1413–1433Google Scholar
  47. Rettenberger M, Matthes A, Boer DP, Eher R (2010) Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 54(2):169–186Google Scholar
  48. Rettenberger M, Matthes A, Schilling F, Eher R (2011) Die Validität dynamisch-veränderbarer Risikofaktoren bei der Vorhersage einschlägiger Rückfälle pädosexueller Straftäter. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 5(1):45–53Google Scholar
  49. Rutter M, Kim-Cohen J, Maughan B (2006) Continuities and discontinuities in psychopathology between childhood and adult life. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47(3-4):276–295Google Scholar
  50. Ryan JP, Testa MF (2005) Child maltreatment and juvenile delinquency: Investigating the role of placement and placement instability. Child Youth Serv Rev 27(3):227–249Google Scholar
  51. Seto MC, Lalumière ML (2010) What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 136(4):526Google Scholar
  52. Smith C, Thornberry TP (1995) The relationship between childhood maltreatment and adolescent involvement in delinquency. Criminology 33(4):451–481Google Scholar
  53. Statistisches Bundesamt (2017a) Statistiken der Kinder- und Jugendhilfe: Gefährdungseinschätzungen nach § 8a Absatz 1 SGB VIII 2016. DeStatis, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  54. Statistisches Bundesamt (2017b) Statistiken der Kinder- und Jugendhilfe: Heimerziehung, sonstige betreute Wohnform 2015. DeStatis, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  55. Vasileva M, Petermann F, Nitkowski D, Petermann U (2018) Den transgenerationalen Kreislauf der Gewalt durchbrechen: Wie kann man aggressiven Jugendlichen mit Gewalterfahrungen helfen? Kindh Entwickl 27(2):91–101.  https://doi.org/10.1026/0942-5403/a000249 Google Scholar
  56. Vettori N, Maran T, Andretta P (2018) Frühes Trauma – spätere Delinquenz? Die Bedeutung traumatischer Kindheit für delinquentes Verhalten in der Adoleszenz. Trauma Gewalt 12(1):38–47.  https://doi.org/10.21706/tg-12-1-38 Google Scholar
  57. Vinnerljung B, Sallnäs M (2008) Into adulthood: a follow-up study of 718 young people who were placed in out-of-home care during their teens. Child Fam Soc Work 13(2):144–155Google Scholar
  58. Vorria P, Rutter M, Pickles A, Wolkind S, Hobsbaum A (1998) A comparative study of Greek children in long-term residential group care and in two-parent families: I. Social, emotional, and behavioural differences. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip 39(2):225–236Google Scholar
  59. Warburton WP, Warburton RN, Sweetman A, Hertzman C (2014) The impact of placing adolescent males into foster care on education, income assistance, and convictions. Can J Econ 47(1):35–69Google Scholar
  60. Whitfield CL (1998) Adverse childhood experiences and trauma. Am J Prev Med 14(4):361–364Google Scholar
  61. Widom CS (1991) The role of placement experiences in mediating the criminal consequences of early childhood victimization. Am J Orthopsychiatry 61(2):195–209Google Scholar
  62. Wolff KT, Baglivio MT, Piquero AR (2017) The relationship between adverse childhood experiences and recidivism in a sample of juvenile offenders in community-based treatment. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 61(11):1210–1242Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franziska Brunner
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elisabeth Stück
    • 1
  • Dahlnym Yoon
    • 2
  • Martin Rettenberger
    • 3
    • 4
  • Peer Briken
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Sexualforschung und Forensische PsychiatrieUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE)HamburgDeutschland
  2. 2.Institut für Psychologie, Lehrgebiet Persönlichkeitspsychologie, Diagnostik & BeratungFernUniversität in HagenHagenDeutschland
  3. 3.Kriminologische Zentralstelle (KrimZ)WiesbadenDeutschland
  4. 4.Psychologisches InstitutJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz (JGU)MainzDeutschland

Personalised recommendations