The tibial bayonet method of wound closure
- 740 Downloads
Management of open lower limb fractures with soft tissue defects can be a technically challenging orthopaedic problem. Limited availability of orthoplastic services means that alternatives to the fix and flap concept are required in order to prevent infected non-unions from developing. The proposed ‘bayonet apposition’ allows the surgeon to temporarily shorten the limb without angulating the limb or creating a bone defect and removing viable bone. The viable bone edges are overlapped in a bayonet-like manner in order to appose the wound and skin edges. The limb length is restored by gradually distracting the bone segments once the soft tissues have healed. This is facilitated with a hexapod fixator for stabilization of the fracture and distraction. Prerequisites for utilizing this method are circumferential soft tissue damage to the lower limb with viable distal tissue. The bayonet method allows primary closure of a wound and rapid restoration of the native length of the limb.
KeywordsLimb salvage Compound tibial fractures Hexapod-assisted closure Bayonet method Duplication
Compound tibial fractures are severe limb-threatening injuries and can result in high patient mortality and protracted hospital care. These cases are often associated with significant soft tissue loss and defects that require both bony and soft tissue reconstruction with either regional or free tissue flaps . The flaps are performed in conjunction with definitive fracture management.
Early soft tissue cover lowers infection rates by converting an open fracture to a closed one and has resulted in this ‘fix and flap’ concept being widely accepted as the preferred standard of care for compound tibias [2, 3, 4, 5, 6].
However, the limited availability of orthoplastic teams necessary to perform definite flaps or tissue transfers at the initial surgical setting results in a delay in soft tissue cover and increased post-operative infection rates . The resultant higher morbidity in open fractures with delayed closure is well documented in the literature with infection rates up to 44% [8, 9].
The scarcity of combined orthoplastic teams has necessitated the development of alternative strategies for converting an open to a closed fracture. One of the alternatives is to create or exaggerate the deformity in order to close the wound primarily. There are a multitude of methods described that successfully utilize circular fixators (both Ilizarov fine-wire fixators and octahedral hexapod fixators) to close these defects primarily either by angulating and deforming the fracture or by acutely shortening the bone segment in order to close the wound [10, 11, 12, 13]. Thereafter, the anatomical alignment of the bone is gradually restored by distraction osteogenesis or callotasis [12, 14, 15, 16, 17]. This negates the need for moving soft tissue into the affected region. The downside of these procedures is a bone defect which either requires bone transport to correct the bone loss or a program to correct the deformity with associated complications such as joint stiffness and contractures .
There are several prerequisites for utilizing this method. Firstly, a transverse laceration extending more than two-thirds around the limb up to a completely circumferential laceration is required. Secondly, the soft tissues and bone need to have been adequately debrided, ideally performed by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon. This procedure can be done either at the initial setting in order to follow the concept of fix and flap surgery in converting an open fracture to a closed fracture or at the mandatory subsequent repeat visit to theatre following the initial debridement.
These are injuries that have a high complication rate osteomyelitis, bone loss, amputation, and the extent of the tissue damage needs to be appreciated by both the surgeon and the patient .
Technique and method
Similar to the benchmark method of ‘fix and flap’ which usually includes two scheduled surgeries, the bayonet method too required two scheduled surgeries, however with the advantage of circumventing the need to be dependent on plastic surgeon’s availability: the first surgery for frame application, deformation and closure and the second for frame removal. In this case, there was also one unscheduled theatre visit in order to extend the frame across the ankle for the equinus correction.
The wound was a 270-degree circumferential skin wound, from postero-lateral to postero-medial aspect of the middle third of the leg. The underlying muscle bellies were intact and did not require repair. Sensation and motor function were present distally (the latter was decreased). The struts were kept loose in order to allow bayonetting. The distal fragment was inserted into the soft tissue pocket. There was no interposing tissue, and the bone fragments were overlapped until the skin edges could be opposed in a tension-free manner (Fig. 4). The struts were locked in place, and the wound was closed primarily.
Tibial shaft fractures with soft tissue defects are a technically challenging orthopaedic problem that require meticulous surgery and an array of skills necessary in order to prevent infected non-unions from developing. In optimal settings, free or local flaps are sufficient for definitive cover. There are acceptable associated risks and donor site morbidities associated with these free flaps. The limited availability of orthoplastic services prevents the flap and fix concept from being widely implemented.
Hexapod-assisted deformity creation allows soft tissue management with stable biomechanical fixation. This method has been successfully used in treating soft tissue defects in compound fractures by deforming and/or acutely shortening the affected limb [10, 12, 14]. The octatetrahedral hexapod utilizes a two-ring construct, with six struts and web-based program to correct deformities.
The bayonet method allows primary closure of a wound and rapid restoration of the native length of the limb. This avoids the need to be dependent on plastic surgeon availability for coverage of wounds. It is not the solution to all compound tibial fractures that need soft tissue cover but are another tool in the limb reconstruction quiver that enables the surgeon to facilitate patients to return to their premorbid functioning as quickly as possible.
Equinovarus foot is a known result of incorrect position while immobilizing a leg and problem with leaving leg short . This could have been potentially avoided by a more aggressive restoration of the alignment and length. (Also, decreasing the ‘latent’ period could have prevented the subsequent deformity or lessened the severity.) If the adjustments had been started earlier, this morbidity could have been avoided. This could have also been avoided by spanning the ankle joint with the frame from the beginning.
Complications of an equinus contracture at the ankle and a caves foot are preventable and demonstrate the need to restore length early prior to musculo-tendinous units becoming contracted.
While the formulation of a set of guidelines is beyond the scope of this paper, this is a viable option to treat circumferential wounds and tibial fractures that are not overtly contaminated and where minimal bone debridement is required.
Acute shortening should be avoided in cases where vascular compromise is a risk of if a vascular intervention or repair has occurred.
Limb salvage is a rapidly developing/evolving field. Patients who were previously destined to have a limb amputated are now able to have that severely injured limb salvaged. While there are multiple methods to achieve this goal, every orthopaedic surgeon who engages in limb salvage work needs to add as many skills/tools to their armamentarium in order to take maximum advantage of available soft tissue and bone.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The content of the article is the sole work of the authors. One or more of the authors are paid educational consultants for the medical device companies mentioned in the text. The procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration (1964, amended most recently in 2008) of the World Medical Association. The patient’s written consent was obtained for inclusion of his data in this paper.
- 3.Giannoudis P, Papakostidis C, Roberts C (2006) A review of the management of open fractures of the tibia and femur. Bone Joint J 88(3):281–289Google Scholar
- 9.Gopal S, Giannoudis P, Murray A, Matthews S, Smith R (2004) The functional outcome of severe, open tibial fractures managed with early fixation and flap coverage. Bone Joint J 86(6):861–867Google Scholar
- 10.El-Rosasy M (2007) Acute shortening and re-lengthening in the management of bone and soft-tissue loss in complicated fractures of the tibia. Bone Joint J 89(1):80–88Google Scholar
- 13.Parmaksizoglu F, Koprulu A, Unal M, Cansu E (2010) Early or delayed limb lengthening after acute shortening in the treatment of traumatic below-knee amputations and Gustilo and Anderson type IIIC open tibial fractures. Bone Joint J 92(11):1563–1567Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.