Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of the size mismatch between saphenous vein graft and coronary artery on graft patency

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The saphenous vein graft (SVG) is widely used in coronary artery bypass grafting because of its availability and ease of use. However, the patency rate of the SVG grafted to the right coronary artery (RCA) is poor. Diameter mismatch between the coronary artery and SVG is an important cause of graft occlusion. In this study, we assessed how the degree of diameter mismatch affects SVG patency.

Methods

We reviewed the records of 123 patients who underwent aorto-right coronary artery bypass grafting with an SVG. The patency rate of the SVG, SVG diameter, RCA diameter and SVG-RCA diameter ratio (SR ratio) was assessed based on angiography and CT.

Results

The mean SVG diameter was 3.61 ± 0.72 mm, the mean RCA diameter was 1.57 ± 0.32 mm and the mean SR ratio was 2.37 ± 0.57. Cumulative patency rate of the SVG was 95.5 % at the early phase, 85.2 % at 1 year, and 70.2 % at 5 years. Multivariate analysis showed that the SR ratio was an independent predictor of SVG occlusion. The cutoff value of the SR ratio was 2.8, calculated from the point of maximal specificity (81.2 %) and sensitivity (64.7 %), and the area under the ROC curve was 0.734. When the SR ratio was ≤2.8, the 3-year patency rate was 86.1 %.

Conclusions

A mismatch between SVG diameter and RCA diameter has an impact on the patency rate of the SVG. Evaluation of the saphenous vein before surgery and selection of a graft to minimize mismatch should improve SVG patency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Endo M, Nishida H, Tomizawa Y, Kasanuki H. Benefit of bilateral over single internal mammary artery grafts for multiple coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation. 2001;104:2164–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Taggart DP, D`Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularization on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet. 2001;358:870–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, Lees B, Nugara F, Yu LM, et al. Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2470–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Suzuki T, Asai T, Matsubayashi K, Kambara A, Kinoshita T, Takashima N, et al. In off-pump surgery, skeletonized gastroepiploic artery is superior to saphenous vein in patients with bilateral internal thoracic arterial grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1159–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hadinata IE, Hayward PA, Hare DL, Matalanis GS, Seevanayagam S, Rosalion A, et al. Choice of conduit for the right coronary system: 8-year analysis of radial artery patency and clinical outcomes trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1404–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Glineur D, Hanet C, Poncelet A, D’hoore W, Funken JC, Rubay J, et al. Comparison of saphenous vein graft versus right gastroepiploic artery to revascularize the right coronary artery: a prospective randomized clinical, functional, and angiographic midterm evaluation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:482–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Benedetto U, Raja SG, Albanese A, Amrani M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Frati G. Searching for the second best graft for coronary artery bypass surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47:59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldman S, Copeland J, Moritz T, Henderson W, Zadina K, Ovitt T, et al. Saphenous vein graft patency 1 year after coronary artery bypass surgery and effects of antiplatelet therapy. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. Circulation. 1989;80:1190–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Souza DS, Bomfim V, Skoglund H, Dashwood MR, Borowiec JW, Bodin L, et al. High early patency of saphenous vein graft for coronary artery bypass harvested with surrounding tissue. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:797–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dashwood MR, Savage K, Tsui JC, Dooley A, Shaw SG, Fernández Alfonso MS, et al. Retaining perivascular tissue of human saphenous vein grafts protects against surgical and distension-induced damage and preserves endothelial nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide synthase activity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138:334–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsuyama K, Kuinose M, Koizumi N, Iwasaki T, Toguchi K, Ogino H. Coronary artery bypass grafting using side-to-side anastomosis with distal end clipping of the saphenous vein graft. J Vasc Med Surg. 2014;2:145.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shuhaiber JH, Evans AN, Massad MG, Geha AS. Mechanisms and future directions for prevention of vein graft failure in coronary bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;22:387–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shah PJ, Gordon I, Fuller J, Seevanayagam S, Rosalion A, Tatoulis J, et al. Factors affecting saphenous vein graft patency: clinical and angiographic study in 1402 symptomatic patients operated on between 1977 and 1999. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:1972–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Une D, Kulik A, Voisine P, Le May M, Ruel M. Correlates of saphenous vein graft hyperplasia and occlusion 1 year after coronary artery bypass grafting: analysis from the CASCADE randomized trial. Circulation. 2013;128:213–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim KB, Lim C, Lee C, Chae IH, Oh BH, Lee MM, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass may decrease the patency of saphenous vein grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:1033–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hata M, Yoshitake I, Wakui S, Unosawa S, Kimura H, Hata H, et al. Long-term patency rate for radial artery vs. saphenous vein grafts using same-patient materials. Circ J. 2011;75:1373–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hayward PA, Buxton BF. Contemporary coronary graft patency: 5-year observational data from a randomized trial of conduits. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:795–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Khaleel MS, Dorheim TA, Duryee MJ, Durbin HE Jr, Bussey WD, Garvin RP, et al. High-pressure distention of the saphenous vein during preparation results in increased markers of inflammation: a potential mechanism for graft failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:552–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ochi M, Hatori N, Fujii M, Saji Y, Tanaka S, Honma H. Limited flow capacity of the right gastroepiploic artery graft: postoperative echocardiographic and angiographic evaluation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:1210–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Glineur D, D’hoore W, de Kerchove L, Noirhomme P, Price J, Hanet C, et al. Angiographic predictors of 3-year patency of bypass grafts implanted on the right coronary artery system: a prospective randomized comparison of gastroepiploic artery, saphenous vein, and right internal thoracic artery grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:980–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshitaka Yamane.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamane, Y., Uchida, N., Okubo, S. et al. Impact of the size mismatch between saphenous vein graft and coronary artery on graft patency. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 65, 25–31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-016-0694-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-016-0694-4

Keywords

Navigation