Advertisement

General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

, Volume 63, Issue 8, pp 465–471 | Cite as

Routinely obtained chest X-rays after elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery can be omitted in most patients; a retrospective, observational study

  • Lars S. BjerregaardEmail author
  • Katrine Jensen
  • René Horsleben Petersen
  • Henrik Jessen Hansen
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

To investigate whether the use of routinely obtained chest X-rays is necessary after elective VATS.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 1097 chest X-rays obtained routinely after elective VATS, performed in patients aged over 15 years during an 18-month period. VATS procedures were divided into three groups according to the degree of pulmonary resection. The chest X-rays (obtained anterior–posterior in one plane with the patient in the supine position) were categorized as abnormal if showing pneumothorax >5 cm, possible intra-thoracic bleeding and/or a displaced chest tube. Medical charts were reviewed for all patients with abnormal chest X-rays to see if an intervention was made based on the X-ray. In case of an intervention, detailed clinical data were collected.

Results

44 of 1097 chest X-rays (4.0 %) were abnormal and 10 of these X-rays (0.9 %) led to a clinical intervention. Proportions of abnormal chest X-rays were unequally distributed between groups (p < 0.001), whereas the number of interventions was not (p = 0.43). Of the ten chests X-rays that led to an intervention, three showed possible intra-thoracic bleeding, six showed pneumothorax >5 cm and one showed a kinked chest tube. All the patients with possible intra-thoracic bleeding were re-explored in the operating theatre the same day.

Conclusions

Only 10 of 1097 chest X-rays (0.9 %) obtained routinely after elective VATS procedures led to a clinical intervention, supporting the abandon of routine chest X rays in favour of a more individualised approach, based on clinical observations.

Keywords

Chest X-ray Fast track Video-assisted thoracic surgery 

Notes

Conflict of interest

Lars S. Bjerregaard and Katrine Jensen declare no conflicts of interest. René Horsleben Petersen is speaker for Covidien, Takeda and Medela. Henrik Jessen Hansen is speaker for Covidien.

References

  1. 1.
    McKenna RJ Jr, Mahtabifard A, Pickens A, Kusuanco D, Fuller CB. Fast-tracking after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy, segmentectomy, and pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1663–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bryant AS, Cerfolio RJ. The analysis of a prospective surgical database improves postoperative fast-tracking algorithms after pulmonary resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:1173–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salati M, Brunelli A, Xiume F, Refai M, Pompili C, Sabbatini A. Does fast-tracking increase the readmission rate after pulmonary resection? A case-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:1083–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bjerregaard LS, Jensen K, Petersen RH, Hansen HJ. Early chest tube removal after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy with serous fluid production up to 500 ml/day. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;45:241–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hansen HJ, Petersen RH, Christensen M. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy using a standardized anterior approach. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1263–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hansen HJ, Petersen RH. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy using a standardized three-port anterior approach—The Copenhagen experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;1:70–6.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ. 2001;322:473–6.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248:189–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cerfolio RJ, Pickens A, Bass C, Katholi C. Fast-tracking pulmonary resections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:318–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar VM, Grant CA, Hughes MW, Clarke E, Hill E, Jones TM, et al. Role of routine chest radiography after percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:663–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olubaniyi BO, Venkatanarasimha N, Roobottom C. Letter to the editor: post-thoracocentesis chest radiograph—is it time for a change in practice? Br J Radiol. 2011;84:671.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yeo WX, Phua CQ, Lo S. Is routine chest X-ray after surgical and percutaneous tracheostomy necessary in adults: a systemic review of the current literature. Clin Otolaryngol. 2014;39:79–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gottgens KW, Siebenga J, Belgers EH, van Huijstee PJ, Bollen EC. Early removal of the chest tube after complete video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39:575–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barak M, Markovits R, Guralnik L, Rozenberg B, Ziser A. The utility of routine postoperative chest radiography in the postanesthesia care unit. J Clin Anesth. 1997;9:351–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whitehouse MR, Patel A, Morgan JA. The necessity of routine post-thoracostomy tube chest radiographs in post-operative thoracic surgery patients. Surgeon. 2009;7:79–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars S. Bjerregaard
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katrine Jensen
    • 2
  • René Horsleben Petersen
    • 2
  • Henrik Jessen Hansen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Section for Surgical Pathophysiology, Rigshospitalet Dept. 7621Copenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryCopenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations