General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

, Volume 63, Issue 6, pp 354–360 | Cite as

An analysis of variations in the bronchovascular pattern of the right upper lobe using three-dimensional CT angiography and bronchography

  • Toshiteru Nagashima
  • Kimihiro Shimizu
  • Yoichi Ohtaki
  • Kai Obayashi
  • Seiichi Kakegawa
  • Seshiru Nakazawa
  • Mitsuhiro Kamiyoshihara
  • Hitoshi Igai
  • Izumi Takeyoshi
Open Access
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

General thoracic surgeons must be familiar with anatomical variations in the pulmonary bronchi and vessels. We analyzed variations in the bronchovascular pattern of the right upper lung lobe using three-dimensional CT angiography and bronchography and then compared our results with those of previous reports.

Methods

We reviewed anatomical variations in the right upper pulmonary bronchus and vessels of 263 patients using 3DCT angiography and bronchography images obtained using a 64-channel multidetector CT and workstation running volume-rendering reconstruction software.

Results

Variations in the pulmonary vein were classified into four types: the “anterior-plus-central vein type” was the most common, noted in 219 cases (83.2 %). The “anterior vein type” was evident in 23 cases (8.8 %), a significantly lower incidence than in previous reports (p < 0.001). Also, the branching patterns of the segmental arteries of the pulmonary artery differed partially from those noted in previous reports. Furthermore, we identified some new variations. The “B1- or B2-defective branch type” bronchus was noted in 19 cases (7.2 %), which was a higher prevalence than that in previous reports.

Conclusion

We explored the bronchovascular pattern and the frequency of variations in the right upper lobe using a large number of 3DCT images. The incidences of variations differed, sometimes significantly, from those noted by previous reports. Moreover, we report some new branching variations. Our data can be used by thoracic surgeons to perform safe and precise lung resections.

Keywords

Lung anatomy Three-dimensional CT Lung cancer surgery Segmentectomy 

Introduction

Lung screening using computed tomography (CT) has recently become widespread, and many small lung lesions are detected using this method. In particular, the incidence of ever-smaller non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), which may have more indolent biological behavior, such as bronchioloalveolar carcinoma, is increasing [1, 2, 3]. Several authors have reported that the prognosis of selected patients undergoing sublobar resection is not inferior to lobectomy with small-sized NSCLC [4, 5, 6]. Therefore, the requirement for anatomical pulmonary segmentectomy, which preserves more lung function compared to lobectomy, has also increased. However, a segmentectomy is technically more difficult than a standard lobectomy because of the anatomical complexity of the lung, featuring both vascular and bronchial structures that vary at different levels. Therefore, complete knowledge of the pulmonary bronchovascular pattern including rare anatomical variations and a full understanding of individual anatomy by general thoracic surgeons has become more important for performance of safe and precise pulmonary surgery.

Recently, advances in multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) and imaging techniques using volume-rendering reconstruction software have allowed reconstruction of three-dimensional (3D) images [7]; a high detection rate of pulmonary vessels using the 3D images has been reported [8, 9]. In addition, the efficacy of 3DCT images for preoperative assessment of thoracic surgery has also been described [10].

Although 3DCT images are useful in understanding individual anatomy, 3DCT imaging is not always available. Moreover, even if we obtain 3DCT images preoperatively, thoracic anatomy is difficult to interpret using 3DCT without underlying data from anatomical atlases and texts. However, currently available data on pulmonary bronchovascular patterns are limited to a few cadaveric studies by Boyden et al. [11] and Yamashita [12] between the 1950s and 1980s.

The purpose of this study was to analyze variations in the pulmonary bronchovascular pattern using 3DCT angiography and bronchography (3DCTAB) and to construct the underlying data of pulmonary segmental structures to replace previous cadaveric studies [11, 12] and for use in anatomical atlases and texts of thoracic surgery. We selected the right upper lobe (RUL) for this first report, because it undergoes more lobectomies and segmentectomies compared with other lobes [13, 14]. Analyses of the bronchovascular pattern and its frequencies are ongoing in the right middle lobe, right lower lobe, left upper, and lower lobes.

Patients and methods

Reconstruction of 3DCTAB imaging

Bronchovascular patterns revealed by 3DCTAB imaging were analyzed using a 64-channel MDCT (SOMATOM Definition Flash; Siemens Healthcare, Berlin, Germany). A total of 35 ml of contrast agent was mechanically injected at 5 ml/s, followed immediately by injection of 20 ml of saline. A solid image was constructed from 1.0-mm data slices of contrast-enhanced CT images with the aid of 3D volume rendering. The volume data from both arterial and venous phases were transferred to a workstation running volume-rendering reconstruction software (Ziostation2; Ziosoft, Tokyo, Japan) that converted the data to the 3DCT angiographic format. The 3D reconstruction of the bronchial tree involved mathematical morphology-based 2D segmentation of axial images, followed by restoration via manual addition of segments from 2D axial images to form 3D images. Radiology technicians processed all 3D images and respiratory surgeons confirmed the validity of the reconstructions.

Patient preparation and examination

Between January 2010 and January 2014, 263 patients with respiratory or mediastinal lesions underwent 3DCTAB prior to surgery. Three of the 263 cases (1.1 %) were excluded, because the subsegmental branches of the pulmonary vessels were not adequately represented on 3DCTAB. Thus, the 260 most recent consecutive cases were analyzed for variations in the pulmonary vessel pattern. The patient characteristics are summarized in e-Table 1. Forty-six of the 263 cases (17 %) yielded insufficient data for a bronchial pattern analysis because the segmental bronchi were not completely visible on 3DCT bronchography. Thus, 214 cases were analyzed for variations in the pulmonary bronchial pattern.

The frequencies of each bronchovascular pattern in our study and those of previous studies (Yamashita [12] and Boyden [11]) were compared using the χ2 test. However, some parts of the branching patterns have not been described in previous studies [11, 12], and we could not compare our data with these previous data. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistics ver. 22 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). This retrospective study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at Gunma University Hospital.

Detection rate of 3DCTAB

To assess the detection rate of pulmonary vessels of 3DCTAB, the findings were retrospectively compared with actual anatomy using operation reports and intraoperative videos. A total of 155 patients who underwent right upper lobectomy, right middle lobectomy, or left upper lobectomy were included in this verification study, because the discrepancy between the 3DCTAB findings and anatomical variations in the pulmonary artery could only be compared for these surgical procedures.

Definition of pulmonary artery and vein

Branching of the pulmonary artery was defined as four names as follows: trunk superior (Tr. sup): Tr. sup is the first branch of the right main pulmonary artery; trunk inferior (Tr. inf): Tr. inf is the second branch of the right main pulmonary artery and arises from the mediastinal portion of the artery, between the distal region of Tr. sup and the proximal region of the first middle lobe of the pulmonary artery; ascending artery (A. asc): A. asc arises from the interlobar portion of the right pulmonary artery and generally branches from the distal region of the first middle lobe artery; recurrent artery (A. rec): A. rec is the artery that branches from the Tr. sup and crosses above the right upper lobe bronchus to S2 (S. dorsal) (Fig. 1a–d).
Fig. 1

Types of branching in the right upper lobe arteries. a Tr. sup + A. asc type. b Tr. sup + Tr. inf + A. asc type. c Tr. sup type. d Tr. sup + Tr. inf type. Squares trunks superior, circles trunks inferior, triangles ascending artery

Branching of the pulmonary vein was defined as two names as follows: anterior vein (V. ant): V. ant is the vein that arises from the mediastinal side and ascends the anterior face of the upper lobe bronchus; central vein (V. cent): V. cent is the vein that arises from the interlobar side and ascends through the center of the lung, between B2 and B3 (Fig. 2a–d).
Fig. 2

Types of branching in the right upper lobe veins. a Anterior with central vein type (Iab type). b Anterior with central vein type (Ib type). c Anterior vein type. d Central vein type

Results

Detection rate of 3DCTAB

A total of 455 pulmonary arterial branches were resected using the above lung resection procedures. All of the resected pulmonary arterial branches in 149 patients (96.1 %) were detected by 3DCTAB. Only six pulmonary arteries (1.3 %) of the 455 resected branches were not detected by 3DCTAB, including two right ascending arteries, two right middle lobe arteries, one left lingular artery, and one left A1+2c, which were all <1.5 mm in diameter. Thus, the detection rate of our 3DCTAB (98.7 %) was feasible for this study.

Pulmonary artery

Pulmonary artery branching patterns were classified into four types (Table 1; Fig. 1a–d). The “Tr. sup + A. asc type” was evident in 189 cases (71.9 %) (Fig. 1a) and was the most common type. Tr. inf was seen in 45 cases (17.1 %), and these cases were further divided into two types. The “Tr. sup + Tr. inf + A. asc type” was evident in 36 cases (13.7 %) (Fig. 1b) and the “Tr. sup + Tr. inf type” was seen in nine cases (3.4 %) (Fig. 1d). Only the Tr. sup branched from the main pulmonary artery in the “Tr. sup type” and no other branches were evident. This variation was seen in 26 cases (9.9 %) (Fig. 1c). In 225 examples of A. asc, 28 had two ascending arteries (12.4 %). Our data did not differ significantly from those of Yamashita [12].
Table 1

Branching types of the right upper lobe artery, vein, and bronchus

 

Our study (n = 263)

Yamashita (n = 170)

p value

Figures

No.

%

No.

%

Pulmonary artery

 Tr. sup + A. asc type

189

71.9

133

78.0

0.13

1a

 Tr. sup + Tr. inf + A. asc type

36

13.7

22

13.1

0.82

1b

 Tr. sup type

26

9.9

10

5.9

0.14

1c

 Tr. sup + Tr. inf type

9

3.4

5

3.0

0.78

1d

 N/A

3

1.1

Pulmonary vein

 Anterior with central vein type (Iab type)

150

57.0

86

50.8

0.18

2a

 Anterior with central vein type (Ib type)

69

26.2

33

19.3

0.10

2b

 Anterior vein type

23

8.8

37

21.7

<0.001

2c

 Central vein type

18

6.9

14

8.2

0.58

2d

 N/A

3

1.1

Bronchus

 Bifurcated type

77

29.3

90

53

<0.001

 

  B1 + B2, B3

38

14.4

46

27

0.001

3b

  B1 + B3, B2

23

8.8

19

11

0.40

3c

  B2 + B3, B1

16

6.1

25

15

0.003

3d

 Defective B1 or B2

19

7.2

7

4

0.18

 

  B2 + BX1a, B3 + BX1b

13

4.9

NR

3e

  B1 + BX2a, B3 + BX2b

6

2.3

7

4

0.27

 

Trifurcated type (B1, B2, B3)

116

44.1

51

30

0.003

3a

Quadrivial type

2

0.8

22

13

<0.001

3f

N/A

49

18.6

N/A not available, NR the type was not referred

Segmental arteries

The apical segmental artery (A1)

The A1a and A1b branching patterns were divided into two types (e-Table 2; e-Fig. 1a, b). In 225 cases (85.6 %), the A1a + A1b branched together directly from the Tr. sup (e-Fig. 1a). However, in 35 cases (13.3 %), only A1a branched directly from the Tr. sup, and A1b branched from an A3 that bifurcated from the Tr. sup (e-Fig. 1b). The former pattern occurred significantly more frequently than noted in previous studies (Yamashita, p < 0.001; Boyden, p = 0.01) [11, 12].

The posterior segmental artery (A2)

Normally, A2 consists of A. rec and A. asc. The A2a and A2b branching patterns were classified into three types (e-Table 2; e-Fig. 2a–c). The “A2a branching from A. rec, A2b branching from A. asc” type was noted in 122 cases (46.4 %) (e-Fig. 2a) and was the most common type. We did not encounter the “A2a branching from A. asc, A2b branching from Tr. inf” type (as noted in 1.2 % of the cases of Yamashita, cited above) [12]. Some new variations in the branching pattern were identified. A2 (A2b alone, or both the A2a and A2b branches) arose with A3, in a common trunk, from the Tr. sup or Tr. inf. This new variation was present in 11 cases (4.2 %) (e-Fig. 2d). A2 (A2b alone or both the A2a and A2b) branching with A6, as a common trunk from the intermediate pulmonary artery, was evident in 13 cases (5.0 %) (e-Fig. 2e, f).

The anterior segmental artery (A3)

The A3 branching pattern was classified into five types (e-Table 2; e-Fig. 3a–e). The “A3a + A3b from Tr. sup” type was noted in 180 cases (68.5 %) (e-Fig. 3a) and was the most common type observed. The “A3a branching from A. asc, A3b branching from Tr. inf” type was noted in only five cases (1.9 %) (e-Fig. 3e). A new anomalous A3 branching pattern was identified in one case (0.4 %); A3a branched from the right middle lobe artery (e-Fig. 3f). The frequencies of variations differed, sometimes significantly, from those noted by Yamashita and Boyden [11, 12].

The pulmonary vein

The pulmonary vein branching pattern was classified into four types (Table 1; Fig. 2a–d). An “anterior with central vein type” was evident in 219 instances (83.2 %) (Fig. 2a, b) and was further subclassified into two types. In the Iab type, V1a and V1b drained into V. ant, and this variation was present in 150 cases (57.0 %) (Fig. 2a). In the Ib type, only V1b drained into V. ant, whereas V1a drained into V. cent. This variation was seen in 69 cases (26.2 %) (Fig. 2b). The “anterior vein type”, in which V1−3 mainly drained into V. ant, was evident in only 23 cases (8.8 %) (Fig. 2c). This type was seen significantly less frequently than in previous reports (Yamashita, p < 0.001) [12]. The “central vein type”, in which V1−3 drained into V. cent, was seen in 18 cases (6.9 %) (Fig. 2d). An anomalous V2 drainage pattern, termed “Aberrant V2”, was also identified; V2 drained into the inferior pulmonary vein, crossing behind the intermediate bronchus. This relatively infrequent type was present in five cases (1.9 %) (e-Fig. 4).

Bronchus

Branching of the right upper bronchus was classified into three types (Table 1; Fig. 3a–f). The trifurcated type (the “B1, B2, and B3” type) was evident in 116 cases (44.1 %; Fig. 3a), and was the most common. The bifurcated type was seen in 77 cases (29.3 %) (Fig. 3b–d). This type was further divided into three subtypes. The “B3 and B1+2” type was evident in 38 of 263 cases (14.4 %) (Fig. 3b) and was the most common. B1 or B2 was rarely absent. In such instances, S1 or S2 was supplied by an accessory bronchus from B2 or B3. The “defective B1” type (B2 + BX1a and B3 + BX1b) was seen in 13 cases (4.9 %) (Fig. 3e), and the “defective B2” type (B1 + BX2a and B3 + BX2b) was evident in 6 cases (2.3 %). The quadrivial type was seen in only two cases (0.8 %) and was significantly less frequent than in previous reports (Yamashita, p < 0.001; Boyden, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3f) [11, 12]. The frequency of the trifurcated type was higher (p = 0.003) and that of the bifurcated type lower than those noted by Yamashita (p < 0.001), but they did not differ significantly from those reported by Boyden [11, 12].
Fig. 3

Types of branching of the right upper lobe bronchus. a The trifurcated type (B1, B2, and B3). b The B1+2, B3 type. c The B1+3, B2 type. d The B2+3, B1 type. e The defective B1 type (B2 + BX1a and B3 + BX1b). f The quadrivial type (B1a, B1b, B2 and B3)

Discussion

For thoracic surgeons, knowledge of pulmonary bronchovascular patterns including rare anatomical variations is extremely important to perform safe and accurate pulmonary resection. We report here a systematic radiological analysis of the pulmonary structure of the RUL and the discrepancy between our results and those of previous reports [11, 12]. A few reports have focused on thoracic anatomical abnormalities detected with the aid of 3DCT [15, 16]. However, no report has systematically explored the bronchovascular pattern with the aid of 3DCT imagery. This is therefore the first radiological systematic analysis of pulmonary structure and, moreover, our study included the greatest number of cases (n = 263) of all relevant reports (Yamashita, n = 170; Boyden, n = 50).

The branching types noted in the right pulmonary artery were similar to those in previous reports [11, 12]. However, some previous definitions of the pulmonary artery were ambiguous, so these were redefined in this work. Yamashita defined the Tr. inf as the inferior branch of the Tr. sup when the Tr. sup is bifurcated [12]. However, in reality, Tr. inf does not “bifurcate” from Tr. sup, but rather branches peripherally from the main trunk. Furthermore, although the Tr. inf is usually described as branching from the mediastinal side, and A. asc branches interlobarly, the borderline between the mediastinum and the interlobar plane is ambiguous. Thus, Tr. inf and A. asc are often confused. We newly defined that the boundary of the Tr. inf and A. asc was the first middle lobe artery. We encountered cases in which the middle lobe artery branched more peripherally than usual, but this was rare (7/225 cases; 3.1 %) and did not affect the overall results, even compared to previous reports. Thus, our new definition appears to be acceptable.

In contrast, in the right pulmonary vein, the frequency of each branching type differed greatly from that of previous reports. In our study, the “anterior vein type” was seen in only 8.8 % of cases, as compared to 21.7 % in a previous study. This is the most prominent difference between our data and those of previous reports. In a previous report, the combined V. cent frequency was 77 % [12], but it was 90 % in our study. We suggest that this reflects the differences between anatomical and radiological evaluation. It is difficult to clearly distinguish V. cent, which runs between B2 and B3, and V2t, which runs under B2 and B3, using anatomical techniques. 3DCTAB is considerably more effective in this regard.

Our data on the right upper bronchus also differ from those of previous reports [11, 12]. In the present study, the most common type was the “trifurcated”, evident in 44.1 % of cases (Yamashita 30 %, Boyden 30 %; p = 0.003) [11, 12]. The quadrivial type was seen in only two cases (0.8 %) and thus was significantly less common than in previous reports (Yamashita 13 %, Boyden 16 %; p < 0.001) [11, 12]. Furthermore, we found that the defective B1 and B2 patterns were relatively common. If bronchial patterns are analyzed anatomically, the lung parenchyma and pulmonary vessels complicate studying bronchial branching. However, 3DCTAB can simply erase images of the parenchyma and vessels, allowing bronchial branching to be examined from all perspectives. We suggest that our data are more accurate than those of previous reports [11, 12].

These anatomical data, along with all possible variations, should be noted preoperatively. When the separation of the interlobular fissure is incomplete, preoperative knowledge of variations revealed in our study, such as “Aberrant V2” and the “A2 with the A6 type”, is necessary to safely create an interlobular fissure between the upper and lower lobes.

During anatomical sublobar resection, understanding the branching types of the pulmonary vein is extremely important, because the segmental veins bind the pulmonary segments, and the surgical approach varies according to its branching type. For example, V1b, which is an intersegmental vein between S1 and S3, usually drains into the V. ant. However, V1b drains into V. cent only in the “central vein type”. Therefore, a different approach is required to perform anatomical intersegmental dissection between S1 and S3 in this type. Thus, preoperative simulation of individual bronchovascular patterns using MDCT or 3DCT images, as well as knowledge of rare branching patterns of segmental bronchi and arteries, is necessary to perform precise sublobar resection.

Although 3DCT images may be a breakthrough tool in preoperative simulation of lung resection, 3DCT imaging is not available for all patients. Furthermore, in our experience, even if an actual preoperative 3DCT image is obtained, it is difficult to understand the thoracic anatomy without knowledge of the pulmonary bronchovascular patterns and their incidences. Thus, our data of bronchovascular patterns including rare anatomical variations using the accumulated 3DCTAB images of 263 patients in our institute may facilitate safe and accurate lung resection by general thoracic surgeons, regardless of the presence or absence of preoperative 3DCT images.

There were several limitations in this study. First, we could not obtain adequate images of segmental vessels and bronchi from some patients. Although the number of insufficient cases was small, they may have biased our results. Second, our study was an anatomical analysis based on 3DCT findings; thus, it is possible that there were differences in our data from actual anatomy. The detection rate of our 3DCTAB was 98.7 %, so we thought it was reasonable to compare our 3DCTAB data with those of previous reports based on actual anatomy. However, the limitation of differences from actual anatomy still remains, because we did not compare our data with that of the resected lung.

Conclusion

This is the first report on variations in the bronchovascular patterns of the RUL with descriptions of rare branching patterns. We extracted data from a large number of 3DCTAB images, which aided in understanding individual variations in thoracic anatomy. Our data were collected with maximum use of 3DCTAB and should be referred to by thoracic surgeons prior to performing lung resection, particularly lobectomy and segmentectomy.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Yasuhiro Fukushima, Junya Fukuda, and Hiroyuki Takei, Department of Radiology, Gunma University Hospital, for obtaining the 3DCTAB image.

Conflict of interest

Toshiteru Nagashima and other coauthors have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11748_2015_531_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)
11748_2015_531_MOESM2_ESM.pptx (3.6 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (PPTX 3675 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Okada M, Nishino W, Sakamoto T, Uchino K, Hanioka K, Ohbayashi C, et al. Correlation between computed tomographic findings, bronchioloalveolar carcinoma component, and biologic behavior of small-sized lung adenocarcinomas. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:857–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yoshida J, Nagai K, Yokose T, Nishimura M, Kakinuma R, Ohmatsu H, et al. Limited resection trial for pulmonary ground-grass opacity nodules: fifty-case experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:991–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nakata M, Sawada S, Yamashita M, Saeki H, Kurita A, Takashima S, et al. Objective radiologic analysis of ground-grass opacity aimed at curative limited resection for small peripheral non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:1226–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kodama K, Doi O, Higashiyama M, Yokouchi H. Intentional limited resection for selected patients with T1 N0 M0 non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:924–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martin-Ucar AE, Nakas A, Pilling JE, West KJ, Waller DA. A case-matched study of anatomical segmentectomy versus lobectomy for stage I lung cancer in high risk patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27:675–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keenan RJ, Landreneau RJ, Maley RH Jr, Singh D, Macherey R, Bartley S, et al. Segmental resection spares pulmonary function in patients with stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:228–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rubin GD. 3-D imaging with MDCT. Eur J Radiol. 2003;45:37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Watanabe S, Arai K, Watanabe T, Koda W, Urayama H. Use of three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography of pulmonary vessels for lung resections. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(2):388–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Akiba T, Marushima H, Harada J, Kobayashi S, Morikawa T. Importance of preoperative imaging with 64-row three-dimensional multidetector computed tomography for safer video-assisted thoracic surgery in lung cancer. Surg Today. 2009;39(10):844–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shimizu K, Nakano T, Kamiyoshihara M, Takeyoshi I. Segmentectomy guided by three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and bronchography. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;15(2):194–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boyden EA, Scannell JG. An analysis of variations in the bronchovascular pattern of the right upper lobe of 50 lungs. Am J Anat. 1948;82(1):27–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yamashita H. Variations in the pulmonary segments and the bronchovascular trees. Roentgenologic anatomy of the lung. Tokyo: Igaku-syoin; 1978.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Okada M, Mimura T, Ikegaki J, Katoh H, Itoh H, Tsubota N. A novel video-assisted anatomic segmentectomy technique: selective segmental inflation via bronchofiberoptic jet followed by cautery cutting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:753–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scott WJ, Allen MS, Darling G, Meyers B, Decker PA, Putnam JB, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:976–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Akiba T, Marushima H, Odaka M, Harada J, Kobayashi S, Morikawa T. Pulmonary vein analysis using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography for thoracic surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;58:331–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ishikawa Y, Iwano S, Usami N, Yokoi K. An anomalous segmental vein of the left upper lobe of the lung: preoperative identification by three-dimensional computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;15(3):512–3.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toshiteru Nagashima
    • 1
  • Kimihiro Shimizu
    • 1
  • Yoichi Ohtaki
    • 1
  • Kai Obayashi
    • 1
  • Seiichi Kakegawa
    • 1
  • Seshiru Nakazawa
    • 1
  • Mitsuhiro Kamiyoshihara
    • 2
  • Hitoshi Igai
    • 2
  • Izumi Takeyoshi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Thoracic and Visceral Organ SurgeryGunma University Graduate School of MedicineMaebashiJapan
  2. 2.Department of General Thoracic SurgeryMaebashi Red Cross HospitalMaebashiJapan

Personalised recommendations