Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How and when weather boosts consumer product valuation

  • Original Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weather is an ever-present force in consumers’ daily lives, yet marketing lacks a comprehensive understanding of how and when it affects consumers and businesses. The current research investigates the effect of weather, a ubiquitous environmental cue, on consumers’ valuation of products. A large-scale field study and four experiments demonstrate that weather affects product valuation but only under particular conditions. In line with a process account drawing on mental simulation of product use, product valuation increases only if (1) the product is associated (vs. not associated) with a given weather state, as the match of product and weather facilitates mental simulation, and (2) the product is perceived as attractive (vs. unattractive), as mental simulation highlights both positive and negative product characteristics. We test three weather states—sunshine, snowfall, and rain—and find that our effects emerge for sunshine and snowfall but not for rain, as the latter does not enhance mental simulation. The findings advance literature on the effects of environmental cues and mental simulation and guide firms on how to increase consumers’ valuation of products by weather-related measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew, M. D., & Palutikof, J. P. (1999). The impacts of climate on retailing in the UK with particular reference to the anomalously hot summer of 1995. International Journal of Climatology, 19(13), 1493–1507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, E. B., & Cohen, J. B. (2007). On the consumption of negative feelings. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1974). An exploratory assessment of situational effects in buyer behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 11(2), 156–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchheim, L., & Kolaska, T. (2016). Weather and the psychology of purchasing outdoor movie tickets. Management Science, 63(11), 3718–3738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse, M. R., Pope, D. G., Pope, J. C., & Silva-Risso, J. (2015). The psychological effect of weather on car purchases. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 371–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cian, L., Krishna, A., & Elder, R. S. (2015). A sign of things to come: Behavioral change through dynamic iconography. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1426–1446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Pham, M., & Andrade, E. (2008). The nature and role of affect in consumer behavior. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. R. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 297–348). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M. R. (1979). Weather, mood, and helping behavior: Quasi experiments with the sunshine samaritan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 1947–1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bellis, E., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., Brucks, W., Herrmann, A., & Hertwig, R. (2018). Blind haste: As light decreases, speeding increases. PLoS One, 13(1), e0188951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2012). The ‘visual depiction effect’ in advertising: Facilitating embodied mental simulation through product orientation. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 988–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J. E. (2004). Imagine yourself in the product: Mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. D. (1974). Situation-specific variables as determinants of perceived environmental esthetic quality and perceived crowdedness. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutsell, J. N., & Inzlicht, M. (2010). Empathy constrained: Prejudice predicts reduced mental simulation of actions during observation of outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 841–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2012) PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf. Accessed 9 January 2019.

  • Heyman, J. E., Orhun, Y., & Ariely, D. (2004). Auction fever: The effect of opponents and quasi-endowment on product valuations. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(4), 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, C., Häubl, G., & Herrmann, A. (2014). Product customization via starting solutions. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(6), 707–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, D., & Shumway, T. (2003). Good day sunshine: Stock returns and the weather. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1009–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J., & Sun, Y. (2012). Warm it up with love: The effect of physical coldness on liking of romance movies. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, P. A., & McGill, A. L. (1994). Differences in the relative influence of product attributes under alternative processing conditions: Attribute importance versus attribute ease of imagability. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3(1), 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, M. C., Fredrickson, B. L., Ybarra, O., Côté, S., Johnson, K., Mikels, J., Conway, A., & Wager, T. (2005). A warm heart and a clear head the contingent effects of weather on mood and cognition. Psychological Science, 16(9), 724–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, C. III and D. Narayandas (2000), Coca-Cola's New Vending Machine (a): Pricing to capture value, or not?, 1–9, 9–500-068, https://www.alumni.hbs.edu/Documents/reunions/Narayandas_AMP%20Reunion_Coca-Cola%20Case.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2016.

  • Lee, J. J., Gino, F., & Staats, B. R. (2014). Rainmakers: Why bad weather means good productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 504–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D. R., Stuart, J. A., Johar, G. V., & Thozhur, A. (2007). Spontaneous visualization and concept evaluation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(3), 309–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Johnson, E. J., & Zaval, L. (2011). Local warming. Psychological Science, 22(4), 454–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. B. (1991). A test of services marketing theory: Consumer information acquisition activities. Journal of Marketing, 55(1), 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. B., Di Muro, F., Finn, A., & Popkowski Leszczyc, P. (2010). The effect of weather on consumer spending. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17(6), 512–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicas, J. (2015), Now prices can change from minute to minute, Wall Street Journal, Accessed November 30, 2016, http://www.wsj.com/articles/now-prices-can-change-from-minute-to-minute-1450057990.

  • Nielsen, J., Escalas, J. E., & Hoeffler, S. (2018). Mental simulation and category knowledge affect really new product evaluation through transportation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(3), 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrova, P. K., & Cialdini, R. B. (2005). Fluency of consumption imagery and the backfire effects of imagery appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 442–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riccio, D. C., Richardson, R., & Ebner, D. L. (1984). Memory retrieval deficits based upon altered contextual cues: A paradox. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 152–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rind, B. (1996). Effect of beliefs about weather conditions on tipping. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(2), 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rind, B., & Strohmetz, D. (2001). Effect of beliefs about future weather conditions on restaurant tipping. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(10), 2160–2164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanna, L. J. (2000). Mental simulation, affect, and personality a conceptual framework. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(5), 168–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, E. M. (1993). Stock prices and wall street weather. American Economic Review, 83(5), 1337–1345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, A. T. (1951). Weather’s Effect on the Sales of a Department Store. Journal of Marketing, 15(4), 436–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224295101500404

  • Taylor, S. E., & Schneider, S. K. (1989). Coping and the simulation of events. Social Cognition, 7(2), 174–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., Pham, L. B., Rivkin, I. D., & Armor, D. A. (1998). Harnessing the imagination: Mental simulation, self-regulation, and coping. American Psychologist, 53(4), 429–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. V., Hamilton, R. W., & Petrova, P. K. (2009). When mental simulation hinders behavior: The effects of process-oriented thinking on decision difficulty and performance. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 562–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ülkümen, G., & Thomas, M. (2013). Personal relevance and mental simulation amplify the duration framing effect. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 194–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, M., Hoeffler, S., & Zauberman, G. (2011). Mental simulation and product evaluation: The affective and cognitive dimensions of process versus outcome simulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 827–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwebner, Y., Lee, L., & Goldenberg, J. (2013). The temperature premium: Warm temperatures increase product valuation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 251–259.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université de Lausanne, UNIL-Dorigny, Bâtiment Anthropole 3054, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Tobias Schlager

  2. Institute for Customer Insight, University of St. Gallen, Bahnhofstrasse 8, CH-9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Emanuel de Bellis

  3. Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada

    JoAndrea Hoegg

Authors
  1. Tobias Schlager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emanuel de Bellis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. JoAndrea Hoegg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Schlager.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Gergana Nenkov served as Area Editor for this article.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 5599 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schlager, T., de Bellis, E. & Hoegg, J. How and when weather boosts consumer product valuation. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 48, 695–711 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00717-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00717-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation