Advertisement

Does the CMO’s personality matter for web traffic? Evidence from technology-based new ventures

  • Hans-Jörg Winkler
  • Verena Rieger
  • Andreas EngelenEmail author
Original Empirical Research

Abstract

This study investigates whether the personalities of Chief Marketing Officers (CMOs) of technology-based new ventures affect how the increasing maturity of new ventures translates into web traffic. Drawing on upper echelon theory and the interactionist theory of job performance, we explain how certain personality traits from the five-factor model are relevant to the job demands a CMO faces in technology-based new ventures. We build a multi-source dataset on 627 new ventures and use a novel approach to measuring personality that is based on computer text analysis—specifically, the LIWC application—which we apply to the CMOs’ Twitter accounts. Our findings indicate that a CMO’s extraversion positively moderates the relationship between a new venture’s maturity and web traffic, while a CMO’s conscientiousness is a negative moderator of this relationship. These results have useful theoretical and practical implications for the role of the CMO and for marketing new ventures in general.

Keywords

Chief marketing officer Technology-based new ventures Personality Firm maturity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful for the insightful comments provided by the editor, John Hulland, the associate editor, and by three anonymous reviewers. The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper provided by Martin Klarmann.

Supplementary material

11747_2019_671_MOESM1_ESM.docx (66 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 66.3 kb)

References

  1. Ailawadi, K. L., & Farris, P. W. (2017). Managing multi- and Omni-Channel distribution: Metrics and research directions. The Future of Retailing, 93, 120–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2016.12.003.Google Scholar
  2. Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. Leadership Quarterly Yearly Review, 21, 1086–1120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010.Google Scholar
  3. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x.Google Scholar
  4. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00160.Google Scholar
  5. Beckman, C. M., & Burton, M. D. (2008). Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organization Science, 19, 3–24.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0311.Google Scholar
  6. Bhave, M. P. (1994). A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 223–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90031-0.Google Scholar
  7. Bjerke, B., & Hultman, C. (2002). Entrepreneurial marketing - the growth of small firms in the new economic era. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  8. Boyd, D., Chandy, R. K., & Cunha, M. (2010). When do chief marketing officers affect firm value?: A customer power explanation. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 1162–1176.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, T. J., Mowen, J. C., Donavan, D. T., & Licata, J. W. (2002). The customer orientation of service workers: Personality trait effects on self- and supervisor performance ratings. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 110–119.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.110.18928.Google Scholar
  10. Brush, C. G., & Chaganti, R. (1996). Cooperative strategies in non-high-tech new ventures: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 21(2), 37–54.Google Scholar
  11. Buyl, T., Boone, C., & Wade, J. B. (2017). CEO narcissism, risk-taking, and resilience: An empirical analysis in U.S. commercial banks. Journal of Management.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317699521.
  12. Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. (2004). Upper echelons revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30, 749–778.Google Scholar
  13. Certo, S. T., Busenbark, J. R., Woo, H.-S., & Semadeni, M. (2016). Sample selection Bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 2639–2657.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2475.Google Scholar
  14. Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). It's all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351–386.Google Scholar
  15. Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2011). Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 202–237.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839211427534.Google Scholar
  16. Ciavarella, M. A., Buchholtz, A. K., Riordan, C. M., Gatewood, R. D., & Stokes, G. S. (2004). The big five and venture survival: Is there a linkage? Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 465–483.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.03.001.Google Scholar
  17. de Jong, A., Song, M., & Song, L. Z. (2013). How Lead founder personality affects new venture performance: The mediating role of team conflict. Journal of Management, 39(7), 1825–1854.Google Scholar
  18. DeKinder, J. S., & Kohli, A. K. (2008). Flow signals: How patterns over time affect the acceptance of start-up firms. Journal of Marketing, 72, 84–97.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.5.84.Google Scholar
  19. Edelman, B., & Brandi, W. (2015). Risk, information, and incentives in online affiliate marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0472.Google Scholar
  20. Engelen, A., Neumann, C., & Schmidt, S. (2016). Should entrepreneurially oriented firms have narcissistic CEOs? Journal of Management, 42, 698–721.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313495413.Google Scholar
  21. Fried, V. H., & Hisrich, R. D. (1994). Toward a model of venture capital investment decision making. FM: The Journal of the Financial Management Association, 23(3), 28–37.Google Scholar
  22. Funder, D. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197–221.Google Scholar
  23. Galasso, A., & Simcoe, T. (2011). CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Science, 57(8), 1469–1484.Google Scholar
  24. Germann, F., Ebbes, P., & Grewal, R. (2015). The chief marketing officer matters! Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 1–22.Google Scholar
  25. Gerstner, W.-C., König, A., Enders, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2013). CEO narcissism, audience engagement, and organizational adoption of technological discontinuities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 257–291.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213488773.Google Scholar
  26. Goldberg, L. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.Google Scholar
  27. Gruber, M. (2004). Marketing in new ventures: Theory and empirical evidence. Schmalenbach Business Review, 56(2), 164–199.Google Scholar
  28. Gruber, M., MacMillan, I. C., & Thompson, J. D. (2010). From minds to markets: How human capital endowments shape market opportunity identification of technology start-ups. Journal of Management, 38, 1421–1449.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310386228.Google Scholar
  29. Gupta, A., Nadkarni, S., & Mariam, M. (2018). Dispositional sources of managerial discretion: CEO ideology, CEO personality, and firm strategies. Administrative Science Quarterly.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218793128.
  30. Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.Google Scholar
  31. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.Google Scholar
  32. Hanks, S., Watson, C., Jansen, E., & Chandler, G. (1993). Tighening the life-cycle construct: A taxonomic study of growth stage configurations in high-technology organizations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(2), 5–29.Google Scholar
  33. Hellmann, T., & Puri, M. (2002). Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. Journal of Finance, 57, 169–197.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00419.Google Scholar
  34. Herrmann, P., & Nadkarni, S. (2014). Managing strategic change: The duality of CEO personality. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1318–1342.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2156.Google Scholar
  35. Hills, G., & LaForge, R. (1992). Research at the marketing Interface to advance entrepreneurship theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(3), 33–59.Google Scholar
  36. Hills, H., Hultman, C., & Miles, M. (2008). The Evoluation and development of entrepreneurial marketing. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(1), 99–112.Google Scholar
  37. Homburg, C., Hahn, A., Bornemann, T., & Sandner, P. (2014). The role of chief marketing officers for venture capital funding: Endowing new ventures with marketing legitimacy. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(5), 625–644.Google Scholar
  38. Jin, L., Madison, K., Kraiczy, N. D., Kellermanns, F. W., Crook, T. R., & Xi, J. (2017). Entrepreneurial team composition characteristics and new venture performance: A meta-analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 743–771.  https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12232.Google Scholar
  39. Josephson, B., Johnson, J., & Mariadoss, B. (2016). Strategic marketing ambidexterity: Antecedents and financial consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4), 539–554.Google Scholar
  40. Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015). The person–situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the big five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1149–1179.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0837.Google Scholar
  41. Jung, H., Vissa, B., & Pich, M. (2017). How do entrepreneurial founding teams allocate task positions? AMJ, 60, 264–294.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0813.Google Scholar
  42. Kazanjian, R. (1988). Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 257–279.Google Scholar
  43. Klotz, A. C., & Neubaum, D. O. (2017). Article commentary: Research on the dark side of personality traits in entrepreneurship: Observations from an organizational behavior perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40, 7–17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12214.Google Scholar
  44. Klotz, A. C., Hmieleski, K. M., Bradley, B. H., & Busenitz, L. W. (2014). New venture teams. Journal of Management, 40, 226–255.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313493325.Google Scholar
  45. Leung, A. (2003). Different ties for different needs: Recruitment practices of entrepreneurial firms at different developmental stages. Human Resource Management, 42(4), 303–320.Google Scholar
  46. Li, J., & Tang, Y. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 45–68.Google Scholar
  47. Lodish, L., Morgan, H., & Kallianpur, A. (2001). Entrepreneurial marketing: Lessons form Wharton’s pioneering MBA course. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Luo, X., & Zhang, J. (2013). How do consumer buzz and traffic in social media marketing predict the value of the firm? Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 213–238.  https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222300208.Google Scholar
  49. Mabey, C., Wong, A. L. Y., & Hsieh, L. (2015). Knowledge exchange in networked organizations: Does place matter? R&D Management, 45, 487–500.  https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12099.Google Scholar
  50. MacMillan, I., Siegel, R., & Narasimha, P. (1985). Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 119–132.Google Scholar
  51. Mairesse, F., Walker, M. A, Mehl, M. R., & Moore, R. K. (2007). Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 30, 457–500.Google Scholar
  52. Malhotra, S., Reus, T. H., Zhu, P., & Roelofsen, E. M. (2018). The acquisitive nature of extraverted CEOs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63, 370–408.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217712240.Google Scholar
  53. McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.Google Scholar
  54. Menz, M. (2012). Functional top management team members: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(1), 45–80.Google Scholar
  55. Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Hermida, R. (2009). A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 36, 121–140.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309349309.Google Scholar
  56. Nadkarni, S., & Herrmann, P. (2010). CEO personality, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The case of the Indian business outsourcing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1050–1073.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533196.Google Scholar
  57. Nath, P., & Mahajan, V. (2008). Chief marketing officers: A study of their presence in Firms' top management teams. Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 65–81.Google Scholar
  58. Nath, P., & Mahajan, V. (2011). Marketing in the C-suite: A study of chief marketing officer power in Firms' top management teams. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 60–77.Google Scholar
  59. Newman, D. (2016). Personality traits of an exceptionally strong CMO. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielnewman/2016/12/27/personality-traits-of-an-exceptionally-strong-cmo. Accessed 31 Jan 2018
  60. Obschonka, M., Fisch, C., & Boyd, R. (2017). Using digital footprints in entrepreneurship research: A twitter-based personality analysis of superstar entrepreneurs and managers. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 8, 13–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2017.05.005.Google Scholar
  61. Ou, A. Y., Waldman, D. A., & Peterson, S. J. (2018). Do humble CEOs matter? An examination of CEO humility and firm outcomes. Journal of Management, 44, 1147–1173.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315604187.Google Scholar
  62. Park, G., Schwartz, H. A., Eichstaedt, J. C., Kern, M. L., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. J., Ungar, L. H., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2015). Automatic personality assessment through social media language. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 108(6), 934–952.Google Scholar
  63. Patel, P. C., & Cooper, D. (2014). The harder they fall, the faster they rise: Approach and avoidance focus in narcissistic CEOs. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1528–1540.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2162.Google Scholar
  64. Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Austin: University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  65. Perrin and Jiang. (2018). About a quarter of U.S. adults say they are ‘almost constantly’ online. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/14/about-a-quarter-of-americans-report-going-online-almost-constantly/. Accessed 27 Apr 2019
  66. Peterson, R. S., Martorana, P. V., Smith, D. B., & Owens, P. D. (2003). The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 795–808.Google Scholar
  67. Petrenko, O. V., Aime, F., Ridge, J., & Hill, A. (2014). Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 262–279.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2348.Google Scholar
  68. Politis, D. (2005). The process of entrepreneurial learning: A conceptual framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 399–424.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00091.x.Google Scholar
  69. Priem, R., Lyon, D., & Dess, G. (1999). Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. Journal of Management, 25(6), 935–953.Google Scholar
  70. Quinn, R., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29(1), 33–51.Google Scholar
  71. Rampton, J. (2014). 12 Habits of successful marketing executives. https://www.inc.com/john-rampton/12-habits-of-successful-cmos.html. Accessed 3 January 2018.
  72. Ramsinghani, M. (2014). The business of venture capital. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  73. Rao, R. S., Chandy, R. K., & Prabhu, J. C. (2008). The fruits of legitimacy: Why some new ventures gain more from innovation than others. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 58–75.Google Scholar
  74. Read, S., Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S. D., Song, M., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Marketing under uncertainty: The logic of an effectual approach. Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 1–18.Google Scholar
  75. Receptiviti Inc. (2017). Receptiviti API user manual. Toronto: Receptiviti Inc.Google Scholar
  76. Ridge, J., & Ingram, A. (2017). Modesty in the top management team: Investor reaction and performance implications. Journal of Management, 43(4), 1283–1306.Google Scholar
  77. Robehmed, N. (2013). Why recent grads are swaming startups. https://www.forbes.com/sites/natalierobehmed/2013/08/13/why-recent-grads-are-swarming-startups/. Accessed 19 December 2017.
  78. Roberts, E. (1991). High stakes for high-tech entrepreneurs: Understanding venture capital decision making. Sloan Management Review, 32(2), 9–20.Google Scholar
  79. Ruef, M., Aldrich, H. E., & Carter, N. M. (2003). The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 195–222.Google Scholar
  80. Saboo, A. R., & Grewal, R. (2013). Stock market reactions to customer and competitor orientations: The case of initial public offerings. Marketing Science, 32(1), 70–88.Google Scholar
  81. Samson, E. (2017). 6 qualities all CMOs need to be successful. https://tech.co/6-qualities-cmos-successful-2017-02. Accessed 3 January 2018.
  82. Schjoedt, L. (2009). Entrepreneurial job characteristics: An examination of their effect on entrepreneurial satisfaction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 619–644.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00319.x.Google Scholar
  83. Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11, 448–469.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.448.14602.Google Scholar
  84. Shu, S. T., Wong, V., & Lee, N. (2005). The effects of external linkages on new product innovativeness: an examination of moderating and mediating influences. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 13(3), 199–218.Google Scholar
  85. Sørensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 81–112.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2666980.Google Scholar
  86. Stewart, G. L. (1996). Reward structure as a moderator of the relationship between extraversion and sales performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 619–627.Google Scholar
  87. Stokes, D. (2000). Putting entrepreneurship into marketing: The process of entrepreneurial marketing. Journal of Research in Marketing & Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  88. Tang, Y., Qian, C., Chen, G., & Shen, R. (2015). How CEO hubris affects corporate social (ir)responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1338–1357.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2286.Google Scholar
  89. Tang, Y., Mack, D. Z., & Chen, G. (2018). The differential effects of CEO narcissism and hubris on corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 1370–1387.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2761.Google Scholar
  90. Tausczik, Y., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2009). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676.Google Scholar
  91. Ter Wal, A. L. J., Alexy, O., Block, J., & Sandner, P. G. (2016). The best of both worlds: The benefits of open-specialized and closed-diverse syndication networks for new ventures’ success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61, 393–432.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216637849.Google Scholar
  92. Tett, R., & Burnett, D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517.Google Scholar
  93. Timmons, J. (1999). New venture creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st century (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  94. Tyebjee, T., & Bruno, A. V. (1984). A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Science, 30, 1051–1066.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1051.Google Scholar
  95. Tyebjee, T., Bruno, A., & McIntyre, S. (1983). Growing ventures can anticipate marketing stages. Harvard Business Review, 61(1), 63–66.Google Scholar
  96. Wang, R., Gupta, A., & Grewal, R. (2017). Mobility of top marketing and sales executives in business-to-business markets: A social network perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 54, 650–670.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0124.Google Scholar
  97. Wooldridge, J. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  98. Wooldridge, J. (2013). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Mason: Cengage learning.Google Scholar
  99. Yadav, M. S., Prabhu, J. C., & Chandy, R. K. (2007). Managing the future: CEO attention and innovation outcomes. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 84–101.Google Scholar
  100. Yarkoni, T. (2010). Personality in 100,000 words: A large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 363–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.04.001.Google Scholar
  101. Zhang, C., Song, P., & Qu, Z. (2011). Competitive action in the diffusion of internet technology products in emerging markets: Implications for global marketing managers. Journal of International Marketing, 19, 40–60.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.11.0009.Google Scholar
  102. Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259–271.Google Scholar
  103. Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2010). The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(2), 381–404.Google Scholar
  104. Zhu, D. H., & Chen, G. (2015a). CEO narcissism and the impact of prior board experience on corporate strategy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, 31–65.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839214554989.Google Scholar
  105. Zhu, D. H., & Chen, G. (2015b). Narcissism, director selection, and risk-taking spending. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 2075–2098.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2322.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans-Jörg Winkler
    • 1
  • Verena Rieger
    • 1
  • Andreas Engelen
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of Business and EconomicsTU Dortmund University44227 DortmundGermany
  2. 2.Department for ManagementHeinrich-Heine-University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations