Sponsorship-linked marketing: research surpluses and shortages
- 3 Downloads
This systematic review of sponsorship-linked marketing from 1996 to 2017 analyzes the current state of research. The overarching conclusion is that there is a surplus of research that examines audience responses to sponsorship-linked marketing but a shortage of research that examines marketing management of the sponsorship process. This misalignment of research needs to research investments stems partly from a failure to consider the sponsorship process as a whole. Research has failed to account for the complexity of the sponsorship-linked marketing ecosystem that influences both audience response and management decision making. The authors develop a sponsoring process model, generalizable to all sponsorship contexts, as an organizing frame for the review and as a reorienting perspective for research and practice. To spur future work, they advance a series of research questions and, to support practice, provide managerial insights.
KeywordsSponsorship Ecosystems Engagement Marketing management Advertising
We would like to thank the following individuals for comments on the manuscript: Dan Crumb, Yoav Dubinsky, Katrina Galas, Conor Henderson, Steffen Jahn, Merritt Richardson, three JAMS reviewers, our AE and the special issue editors, Mark B. Houston, and John Hulland.
- Aaker, D. A. (2001). Managing brand equity. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Anggraeni, E., Den Hartigh, E., & Zegveld, M. (2007). Business ecosystem as a perspective for studying the relations between firms and their business networks. In F. M. van Eijnatten, & J. Peters (eds), Phase Transitions in Ortanisations, Veldhoven, Delft, In ECCON 2007 Annual meeting (pp. 1–21).Google Scholar
- Bice, K. (2018). Kids will be victims of sport bans. Herald Sun, 29 July, 43.Google Scholar
- Cho, S., Lee, M., Yoon, T., & Rhodes, C. (2011). An analysis of the Olympic sponsorship effect on consumer brand choice in the carbonated soft drink market using household scanner data. International Journal of Sport Finance, 6(4), 335–353.Google Scholar
- Conner, C. (2018). Celebrity influencer marketing is dead, report says—Real employees and customer are better. Retrieved June 9, 2018 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/cherylsnappconner/2018/06/08/celebrity-influencer-marketing-is-dead-report-says-real-employees-and-customers-are-better/#19dd2a1e4b0d.
- Doherty, A., & Murray, M. (2007). The strategic sponsorship process in a non-profit sport organization. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 16(1), 49–59.Google Scholar
- eMarketer. (2018). Global Ad Spending: The eMarketer Forecast for 2018. Retrieved December 10, 2018 from https://www.emarketer.com/content/global-ad-spending.
- Farrelly, F., & Greyser, S. A. (2007). Sports sponsorship to rally the home team. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 22–25.Google Scholar
- Fisher, E. (2017). ‘Wish list’ puts fans in corporate sponsor seats. Sport Business Journal. Retrieved August 7, 2018 from https://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Journal/Issues/2017/08/07/In-Depth/Seaters.aspx.
- Gerrard, B., Parent, M. M., & Slack, T. (2007). What drives the value of stadium naming rights? A hedonic-pricing approach to the valuation of sporting intangible assets. International Journal of Sport Finance, 2(1), 10–24.Google Scholar
- Graffigna, G. (2017). Is a transdisciplinary theory of engagement in organized settings possible? A concept analysis of the literature on employee engagement, consumer engagement and patient engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–17.Google Scholar
- Herrmann, J. L., Kacha, M., & Derbaix, C. (2016). “I support your team, support me in turn!”: The driving role of consumers' affiliation with the sponsored entity in explaining behavioral effects of sport sponsorship leveraging activities. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 604–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Humphreys, M. S., Cornwell, T. B., McAlister, A. R., Kelly, S. J., Quinn, E. A., & Murray, K. L. (2010). Sponsorship, ambushing, and counter-strategy: Effects upon memory for sponsor and event. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(1), 96–108.Google Scholar
- IEG. (2015). The declining popularity of category exclusivity. Retrieved July 5, 2018 from http://www.sponsorship.com/IEGSR/2015/06/15/The-Declining-Popularity-of-Category-Exclusivity.aspx.
- IEG. (2016). Average activation-to-fee ratio passes two-to-one mark for the first time. Retrieved October 30, 2018 from http://www.sponsorship.com/iegsr/2016/12/19/Average-Activation-To-Fee-Ratio-Passes-Two-To-One-.aspx.
- IEG. (2016b). The growing popularity of B2B networking councils. Retrieved May 30, 2018 from http://www.sponsorship.com/iegsr/2016/02/04/The-Growing-Popularity-Of-B2B-Networking-Councils.aspx.
- IEG. (2017). Sponsor survey reveals dissatisfaction with property partners. Retrieved June 7, 2018 from http://www.sponsorship.com/Report/2017/12/18/Sponsor-Survey-Reveals-Dissatisfaction-With-Proper.aspx.
- IEG. (2018). Signs point to healthy sponsorship spending in 2018. Retrieved December 11, 2018 from http://www.sponsorship.com/Report/2018/01/08/Signs-Point-To-Healthy-Sponsorship-Spending-In-201.aspx.
- Mack, R. W. (1999). Event sponsorship: An exploratory study of small business objectives, practices, and perceptions. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(3), 25–30.Google Scholar
- Meenaghan, T. (1994). Point of view: Ambush marketing: Immoral or imaginative practice? Journal of Advertising Research, 34(5), 77–88.Google Scholar
- Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2003). Ten Principles of Complexity and Enabling Infrastructures. In E. Mitleton-Kelly (Ed.), Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives on organizations: The application of complexity theory to organizations (pp. 23–50). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Pearsall, J. (2010). Sponsorship performance: What is the role of sponsorship metrics in proactively managing the sponsor-property relationship? Journal of Sponsorship, 3(2), 115–123.Google Scholar
- Peltoniemi, M., & Vuori, E. (2004). Business ecosystem as the new approach to complex adaptive business environments. In Proceedings of eBusiness Research Forum, 267–281.Google Scholar
- Sachse, M., Drengner, J., & Jahn, S. (2009). Negative effects of event sponsoring and ambushing: The case of consumer confusion. In M. C. Campbell, J. Inman, & R. Pieters (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 37, pp. 546–547). Duluth: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar