Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An exploratory study of business-to-business online customer reviews: external online professional communities and internal vendor scorecards

  • Original Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines the increasing use of online customer reviews in business-to-business (B2B) decision making. In contrast with other research on B2B decision making, we study a unique aspect wherein buyers draw on two sources: external reviews posted on online professional communities and internal reviews in the format of vendor scorecards. This method creates a conundrum: What happens when a buyer is confronted with conflicting reviews from two different sources? To shed light on this problem, we (1) interviewed 48 B2B buyers, (2) conducted a field experiment with 293 B2B buyers to examine the effect of review source, (3) conducted a second field experiment with 587 B2B buyers to examine the effect of conflicting reviews, and (4) solicited insights from 82 B2B buyers regarding the findings. The results indicate that B2B buyers are driven to resolve differences in reviews rather than to dismiss negative reviews. In addition, even positive internal reviews prompt exploration to confirm that relational bias is not present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For the sake of brevity, we refer to online customer ratings, reviews, and comments simply as OCRs.

References

  • Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Sakari, H. (2014). Industrial buyers' use of references, word-of-mouth and reputation in complex buying situation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 29(4), 344–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnihotri, A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016). Online review helpfulness: Role of qualitative factors. Psychology and Marketing, 33(11), 1006–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnihotri, R., Kothandaraman, P., Kashyap, R., & Singh, R. (2012). Bringing “social” into sales: The impact of salespeople’s social media use on service behaviors and value creation. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 32(3), 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amblee, N., & Bui, T. (2012). Harnessing the influence of social proof in online shopping: The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales of digital microproducts. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 91–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andzulis, J. M., Panagopoulos, N. G., & Rapp, A. (2012). A review of social media and implications for the sales process. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 32(3), 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendapudi, N., & Leone, R. P. (2002). Managing business-to-business customer relationships following key contact employee turnover in a vendor firm. Journal of Marketing, 66(2), 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigné, E., Caplliure, E. M., & Miquel, M. J. (2016). eWOM on travel agency selection: Specialized versus private label. Psychology and Marketing, 33(12), 1046–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66, 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Challagalla, G., Murtha, B. R., & Jaworski, B. (2014). Marketing doctrine: A principles-based approach to guiding marketing decision making in firms. Journal of Marketing, 78(4), 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, T. K. H., Zheng, X., Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M. K. O., & Lee, Z. W. Y. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of customer engagement in online brand communities. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 2(2), 81–97.

  • Chen, Z., & Lurie, N. H. (2013). Temporal contiguity and negativity bias in the impact of online word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(August), 463–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clivillé, V., & Berrah, L. (2012). Overall performance measurement in a supply chain: Towards a supplier-prime manufacturer based model. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23, 2459–2469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, S. (2015). Study: Millennials starting to take over B2B purchasing. TED (the Electrical Distributor) Magazine, (March 19), 1.

  • Cui, G., Lui, H. K., & Guo, X. (2012). The effect of online consumer reviews on new product sales. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(1), 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Langhe, B., Fernbach, P. M., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (2015). Navigating by the stars: Investigating the actual and perceived validity of online user ratings. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 817–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellarocas, C. (2003). The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49(10), 1407–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doolen, T., Traxler, M., & McBride, K. (2006). Using scorecards for supplier performance improvement: Case application in a lean manufacturing organization. Engineering Management Journal, 18(2), 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, C. (2006). Building a vendor scorecard. Computerworld, 40(22), 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerstrøm, A., Ghinea, G., & Sydnes, L. (2016). Understanding the impact of online reviews on customer choice: A probability discounting approach. Psychology and Marketing, 33(2), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J. M., & Lynch Jr., J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, K., Freling, R., Alhoqail, S., Cho, H. Y., & Freling, T. (2014). How online product reviews affect retail sales: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland, D. I., & Kim, S. K. (2014). When do incentives work in channels of distribution? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(4), 361–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Adeline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godes, D., & Silva, J. C. (2012). Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Science, 31(3), 448–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, T. W., Osmonbekov, T., & Czaplewski, A. J. (2006). eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59, 449–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadcroft, P. (2007). Market orientation: An iterative process of customer and market engagement. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 66(1), 21–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammedi, W., Kandampully, J., Zhang, T., & Bouquiaux, L. (2015). Online customer engagement: Creating social environments through brand community constellations. Journal of Service Management, 26(5), 777–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C. M., Steinhoff, L., & Palmatier, R. W. (2014). Consequences of customer engagement: How customer engagement alters the effects of habit-, dependence-, and relationship-based intrinsic loyalty. MSI Report, 14–121.

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., & Walsh, G. (2003). Electronic word-of-mouth: Motives for and consequences of reading customer articulations on the internet. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(2), 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho-Dac, N. N., Carson, S. J., & Moore, W. L. (2013). The effects of positive and negative online customer reviews: Do brand strength and category maturity matter? Journal of Marketing, 77(6), 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Wilczek, H., & Hahn, A. (2014). Looking beyond the horizon: How to approach the customers' customers in business-to-business markets. Journal of Marketing, 78(September), 58–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Ehm, L., & Artz, M. (2015). Measuring and managing consumer sentiment in an online community environment. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(5), 629–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, N., Burtch, G., Hong, Y., & Polman, E. (2016). Effects of multiple psychological distances on construal and consumer evaluation: A field study of online reviews. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(4), 474–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Institute for Business Value (2015). To buy or not to buy? How millennials are reshaping B2B marketing. IBM Executive Report, 1–17.

  • Johnston, W. J., & Lewin, J. E. (1996). Organizational buying behavior: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Business Research, 35(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192–238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014). What we know and don’t know about online word-of-mouth: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(3), 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostyra, D. S., Reiner, J., Natter, M., & Klapper, D. (2016). Decomposing the effects of online customer reviews on brand, price, and product attributes. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33, 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlenkova, I. V., Palmatier, R. W., Fang, E., & Xiao, B. (2017). Online relationship formation. Journal of Marketing, 81(3), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranzbühler, A. M., Kleijnen, M. H. P., Verlegh, P. W. J., & Teerling, M. (2015). The differential effects of peer and expert ratings on choice. MSI working paper series report no. 15-117. Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., & Pansari, A. (2016). Competitive advantage through engagement. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(4), 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. (2006). Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, M. F., Bettman, J. R., & Payne, J. W. (2000). Attribute identities matter: Subjective perceptions of attribute characteristics. Marketing Letters, 11(2), 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moe, W., & Trusov, M. (2011). The value of social dynamics in online product ratings forums. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 444–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, R. W., Lamberton, C. P., & West, P. M. (2012). Beyond the “like” button: The impact of mere virtual presence on brand evaluations and purchase intentions in social media settings. Journal of Marketing, 76(6), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordovás de Almeida, S., Dholakia, U. M., Hernandez, J. M. C., & Mazzon, J. A. (2014). The mixed effects of participant diversity and expressive freedom in online peer-to-peer problem solving communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28, 196–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pansari, A., & Kumar, V. (2016). Customer engagement: The construct, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Advance online publication. 11 June 2016. doi 10.1007/s11747-016-0485-6.

  • Parasuraman, A., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2002). Marketing to and serving customers through the internet: An overview and research agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pee, L. G. (2016). Negative online consumer reviews. International Journal of Market Research, 58(4), 545–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, C. E., & Donthu, N. (2008). Cultivating trust and harvesting value in virtual communities. Management Science, 54(1), 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2016). Brand value co-creation in a digitalized world: An integrative framework and research implications. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33, 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relling, M., Schnittka, O., Sattler, H., & Johnen, M. (2016). Each can help or hurt: Negative and positive word of mouth in social network brand communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33, 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimensional Research (2013). The impact of customer service on customer lifetime value. Accessed at https://www.zendesk.com/resources/customer-service-and-lifetime-customer-value

  • Rodriguez, M., Peterson, R. M., & Krishnan, V. (2012). Social media’s influence on business-to-business sales performance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 32(3), 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roetzer, P. (2014). The marketing performance blueprint. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney, M., & Zabin, J. (2002). Managing and measuring relational equity in the network economy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, I., & Rosen, E. (2014). Absolute value. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. K., Nishant, R., & Kitchen, P. J. (2016). Self or simulacra of online reviews: An empirical perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 33(12), 1112–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolenyak, M. (1996). What could we have done? There must be a better way. Journal for Quality and Participation, 19(1), 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spina, G., Caniato, F., Luzzini, D., & Ronchi, S. (2013). Past, present and future trends of purchasing and supply management: An extensive literature review. Industrial Marketing Management, 42, 1202–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steward, M. D., Walker, B. A., Hutt, M. D., & Kumar, A. (2010). The coordination strategies of high-performing salespeople: Internal working relationships that drive success. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(5), 550–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., Dong, X., & McIntyre, S. (2017). Motivation of user-generated content: Social connectedness moderates the effects of monetary rewards. Marketing Science, 36(3), 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, T., Fang, E., & Wang, F. (2014). Is neutral really neutral? The effects of neutral user-generated content on product sales. Journal of Marketing, 78(4), 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. A., & Sinha, R. K. (2008). Brand communities and new product adoption: The influence and limits of oppositional loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 72(6), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirunillai, S., & Tellis, G. J. (2014). Mining marketing meaning from online chatter: Strategic brand analysis of big data using latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 463–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). Occupational outlook handbook, 2016 (17th ed.). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C., Che, H., Chan, T. Y., & Lu, X. (2015). The economic value of online reviews. Marketing Science, 34(5), 739–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, Y., Vadakkepatt, G. G., & Joshi, A. M. (2015). A meta-analysis of electronic word-of-mouth elasticity. Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, 27109-7285, USA

    Michelle D. Steward & Michelle L. Roehm

  2. Wake Forest University, 3348 Broadfield Road, Charlotte, NC, 282226-7205, USA

    James A. Narus

Authors
  1. Michelle D. Steward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James A. Narus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michelle L. Roehm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle D. Steward.

Additional information

Michael Ahearne served as Area Editor for this article.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 119 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steward, M.D., Narus, J.A. & Roehm, M.L. An exploratory study of business-to-business online customer reviews: external online professional communities and internal vendor scorecards. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 46, 173–189 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0556-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0556-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation