When and why do customer solutions pay off in business markets?
Manufacturers invest in customer solutions to differentiate their offerings and sustain profitability despite declining margins from goods sales. Notwithstanding strong managerial and academic interest, an examination of whether and explanations for when and why solutions translate into superior performance are lacking. We test hypotheses developed from the resource-based theory and transaction cost economics, supplemented with in-depth theory-in-use interviews, on primary and secondary data collected from 175 manufacturers. From a model that corrects for endogeneity, the findings suggest that, compared with other service offerings, solutions are associated with increased return on sales. This positive profitability effect is enhanced in firms with greater sales capabilities; it is stronger in industries with greater buyer power but weaker in technology-intensive industries. These results caution against the simplistic view of solutions as a universal route to gaining competitive advantage and aid in better identifying the role of solutions in a manufacturer’s offering portfolio.
KeywordsCustomer solutions B2B services B2B marketing Firm performance Return on sales Differentiation
The authors would like to thank Son K. Lam and Kapil Tuli for their insightful and constructive comments on a previous version of this manuscript. They would also like to thank the editor-in-chief, AE, and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback. The authors acknowledge financial support by HEC Foundation. Aleksandra Chabanova, Mehdi Nezami, Nimish Rustagi, and Shiva Taghavi provided research assistance.
- Cohen, J. P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3d ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2014). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Working paper: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
- Johansson, J. E., Krishnamurthy, C., & Schlissberg, H. E. (2003). Solving the solutions problem. The McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 116–125.Google Scholar
- Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Marketing Science Institute. (2010). 2010–2012 research priorities. Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute.Google Scholar
- Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. (1995). Applied linear statistical models (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
- Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Reinartz, W., & Ulaga, W. (2008). How to sell services more profitably. Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 90–96.Google Scholar
- Sawhney, M. (2006). Going beyond the product, defining, designing, and delivering customer solutions. In R. F. Lusch & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions (pp. 365–380). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
- Sawhney, M., Balasubramanian, S., & Krishnan, V. V. (2004). Creating growth with services. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(2), 34–43.Google Scholar
- Shankar, V., Berry, L. L., & Dotzel, T. (2009). A practical guide to combining products + services. Harvard Business Review, 87(11), 94–99.Google Scholar
- Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423–444.Google Scholar
- Wiersema, F. (2012). The B2B agenda: The current state of B2B marketing and a look ahead. University Park, PA: Institute for the Study of Business Markets.Google Scholar
- Zaltmann, G., LeMasters, K., & Heffring, M. (1982). Theory construction in marketing: Some thoughts on thinking. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar