Advertisement

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 32–51 | Cite as

Dispersion of marketing capabilities: impact on marketing’s influence and business unit outcomes

  • Michael T. KrushEmail author
  • Ravipreet S. Sohi
  • Amit Saini
Original Empirical Research

Abstract

The marketing function of firms continues to evolve into many configurations, including the dispersion of marketing capabilities. This study evaluates the effects on the marketing function’s influence when marketing capabilities are dispersed across multiple boundaries. Using a sample of marketing executives, we study the effects of two forms of marketing capabilities dispersion: intra-organizational dispersion and inter-organizational dispersion. We examine the impact of these forms on marketing’s perceived influence within the firm. We also investigate marketing’s influence on customer responsiveness, along with three distal outcomes: marketing strategy implementation success, relationship portfolio effectiveness, and business unit performance. Our findings reveal that marketing’s influence may actually heighten or diminish, depending on the form of marketing capability dispersion. Further, we contribute to findings regarding marketing’s influence on business unit performance. The results provide a new lens for scholars to view and measure marketing dispersion and offer guidance to practitioners.

Keywords

Marketing capabilities Dispersion Marketing influence Business unit performance Accountability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Institute for the Study of Business Markets and their Doctoral Dissertation Award, as well as the Marketing Department at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, for supporting this research.

References

  1. Achrol, R. S., & Kotler, P. (1999). Marketing in the network economy. Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 146–163.Google Scholar
  2. Agustin, C., & Singh, J. (2005). Curvilinear effects of consumer loyalty determinants in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 96–108.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, P. H., Kragh, H., & Lettl, C. (2013). Spanning organizational boundaries to manage creative processes: The case of the lego group. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(1), 125–134.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.Google Scholar
  5. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.Google Scholar
  6. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.Google Scholar
  7. Barney, J. B. (1999). How a firm’s capabilities affect boundary decisions. Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 137–145.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, M. C., & Lillemark, M. (2006). Marketing/R&D integration in the pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 35(1), 105–120.Google Scholar
  9. Bendoly, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Bharadwaj, S. (2012). Complementary drivers of new product development performance: Cross-functional coordination, information system capability, and intelligence quality. Production and Operations Management, 21(4), 653–667.Google Scholar
  10. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.Google Scholar
  11. Bonoma, T. V. (1984). Making your marketing strategy work. Harvard Business Review, 62(2), 69–76.Google Scholar
  12. Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. (1993). Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 441–470.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, S. W., Webster, F. E., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., Wilkie, W. L., Sheth, J. N., Sisodia, R. S., Kerin, R. A., MacInnis, D. J., McAlister, L., & Raju, J. S. (2005). Marketing renaissance: Opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 1–25.Google Scholar
  14. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, D. T. (1955). The informant in quantitative research. American Journal of Sociology, 60(January), 339–342.Google Scholar
  16. Capron, L., & Hulland, J. (1999). Redeployment of brands, sales forces, and general marketing management expertise following horizontal acquisitions: A resource-based view. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 41–54.Google Scholar
  17. Carson, S. J. (2007). When to give up control of outsourced new product development. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 49–66.Google Scholar
  18. CMO Council. (2006). 2006 CMO council annual report. CMO Council.Google Scholar
  19. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Cucchi, A., & Fuhrer, C. (2007). Lifting the veil on organizational structure: A social network analysis of professional e-mail use. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 20(1), 20.Google Scholar
  21. Dahl, R. A. (1964). Modern political analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Darke, P. R., Ashworth, L., & Ritchie, R. J. B. (2008). Damage from corrective advertising: Causes and cures. Journal of Marketing, 72(6), 81–97.Google Scholar
  23. Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1), 31–61.Google Scholar
  24. Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37–52.Google Scholar
  25. Day, G. S. (2011). Closing the marketing capabilities gap. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 183–195.Google Scholar
  26. Deshpande, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E., Jr. (1993). Corporate culture customer orientation, and innovativeness in japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
  27. Dewsnap, B., & Jobber, D. (2002). A social psychological model of relations between marketing and sales. European Journal of Marketing, 36(7/8), 874–894.Google Scholar
  28. Diamantopoulos, A., & Hart, S. (1993). Linking market orientation and company performance: Preliminary evidence on kohli and jaworski’s framework. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 1(2), 93–121.Google Scholar
  29. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511.Google Scholar
  30. Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179–202.Google Scholar
  31. Doz, Y. L., & Hamel, G. (1998). Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  32. Eisenhardt, K. M., Martin, J. A. 2003. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? In C. E. Helfat (Ed.), The SMS Blackwell handbook of organizational capabilities 2003 (341–363): Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  33. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31–81.Google Scholar
  34. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
  35. Frazier, G. L. (1983). Interorganizational exchange behavior in marketing channels: A broadened perspective. Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 68–78.Google Scholar
  36. Frazier, G. L., & Summers, J. O. (1984). Interfirm influence strategies and their applications within distribution channels. Journal of Marketing, 48(3), 43–55.Google Scholar
  37. Frazier, G. L., & Summers, J. O. (1986). Perceptions of interfirm power and its use within a franchise channel of distribution. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 169–176.Google Scholar
  38. Ganesan, S., Malter, A. J., & Rindfleisch, A. (2005). Does distance still matter? Geographic proximity and new product development. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 44–60.Google Scholar
  39. Gaski, J. F. (1986). Interrelations among a channel entity’s power sources: Impact of the exercise of reward and coercion on expert, referent, and legitimate power sources. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(1), 62–77.Google Scholar
  40. Gebhardt, G. F., Carpenter, G. S., & Sherry, J. F., Jr. (2006). Creating a market orientation: A longitudinal, multifirm, grounded analysis of cultural transformation. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 37–55.Google Scholar
  41. Gilley, K. M., & Rasheed, A. (2000). Making more by doing less: An analysis of outsourcing and its effects on firm performance. Journal of Management, 26(4), 763–790.Google Scholar
  42. Granstrand, O., Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Multi-technology corporations: Why they have “distributed” rather than “distinctive” core competencies. California Management Review, 39(4), 8–25.Google Scholar
  43. Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. In M. Zack (Ed.), Knowledge and Strategy (3–23).Google Scholar
  44. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter), 109–122.Google Scholar
  45. Gronroos, C. (1994). From marketing mix to relationship marketing: Towards a paradigm shift in marketing. Management Decision, 32(2), 4–20.Google Scholar
  46. Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource‐based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010.Google Scholar
  47. Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E., & Pennings, J. M. (1971). A strategic contingencies’ theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(2), 216–229.Google Scholar
  48. Homburg, C., Grozdanovic, M., & Klarmann, M. (2007). Responsiveness to customers and competitors: The role of affective and cognitive organizational systems. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 18–38.Google Scholar
  49. Homburg, C., & Jensen, O. (2007). The thought worlds of marketing and sales: Which differences make a difference? Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 124–142.Google Scholar
  50. Homburg, C., Krohmer, H., & Workman, J. P., Jr. (2004). A strategy implementation perspective of market orientation. Journal of Business Research, 57(12), 1331–1340.Google Scholar
  51. Homburg, C., Workman, J. P., Jr., & Jensen, O. (2000). Fundamental changes in marketing organization: The movement toward a customer-focused organizational structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(4), 459–478.Google Scholar
  52. Homburg, C., Workman, J. P., Jr., & Krohmer, H. (1999). Marketing’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 1–17.Google Scholar
  53. Horsky, S. (2006). The changing architecture of advertising agencies. Marketing Science, 25(4), 367–383.Google Scholar
  54. Hult, G. T. M. (2011). Toward a theory of the boundary-spanning marketing organization and insights from 31 organization theories. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(4), 509–536.Google Scholar
  55. Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2005). Market orientation and performance: An integration of disparate approaches. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1173–1181.Google Scholar
  56. Hutt, M. D., & Speh, T. W. (1984). The marketing strategy center: Diagnosing the industrial marketer’s interdisciplinary role. Journal of Marketing, 48(4), 53–61.Google Scholar
  57. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70.Google Scholar
  58. Jayachandran, S., Hewett, K., & Kaufman, P. (2004). Customer response capability in a sense-and-respond era: The role of customer knowledge process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 219–233.Google Scholar
  59. Jayachandran, S., & Varadarajan, R. (2006). Does success diminish competitive responsiveness? Reconciling conflicting perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 284–294.Google Scholar
  60. Johnson, J. L., Sohi, R. S., & Grewal, R. (2004). The role of relational knowledge stores in interfirm partnering. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 21–36.Google Scholar
  61. Jones, T., Taylor, S. F., & Bansal, H. S. (2008). Commitment to a friend, a service provider, or a service company – are they distinctions worth making? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(4), 473–487.Google Scholar
  62. Joreskog, K. G. (2000). Latent variable scores and their uses. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International Inc.Google Scholar
  63. Kalaignanam, K., & Varadarajan, R. (2012). Offshore outsourcing of customer relationship management: Conceptual model and propositions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(2), 1–17.Google Scholar
  64. Keillor, B. D., & Parker, R. S. (2000). Relationship-oriented characteristics and individual salesperson performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 15(1), 7–22.Google Scholar
  65. Ketchen, D. J., Hult, G. T. M., & Slater, S. F. (2007). Toward greater understanding of market orientation and the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9), 961–964.Google Scholar
  66. Kim, K. H. (2005). The relation among fit indexes, power, and sample size in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(3), 368–390.Google Scholar
  67. Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 24–41.Google Scholar
  68. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  69. Kotler, P., & Reibstein, D. (2013). Does your company really need a marketing department? Marketing News,20-21Google Scholar
  70. Krasnikov, A., & Jayachandran, S. (2008). The relative impact of marketing, research-and-development, and operations capabilities on firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 1–11.Google Scholar
  71. Krohmer, H., Homburg, C., & Workman, J. P., Jr. (2002). Should marketing be cross-functional? Conceptual development and international empirical evidence. Journal of Business Research, 55(6), 451–465.Google Scholar
  72. Langlois, R. N. (1992). Transaction-cost economics in real time. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(1), 99–127.Google Scholar
  73. Lavie, D. (2006). Capability reconfiguration: An analysis of incumbent responses to technological change. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 153–174.Google Scholar
  74. Lee, S., Yoon, S. J., Kim, S., & Kang, J. W. (2006). The integrated effects of market-oriented culture and marketing strategy on firm performance. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14(3), 245–261.Google Scholar
  75. Levav, J., & McGraw, A. P. (2009). Emotional accounting: How feelings about money influence consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(1), 66–80.Google Scholar
  76. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149.Google Scholar
  77. McGovern, G., & Quelch, J. (2005). Outsourcing marketing. Harvard Business Review, 83(3), 22–26.Google Scholar
  78. McIvor, R. (2008). What is the right outsourcing strategy for your process? European Management Journal, 26(1), 24–34.Google Scholar
  79. Menon, A., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Howell, R. (1996). The quality and effectiveness of marketing strategy: Effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict in intraorganizational relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(4), 299–313.Google Scholar
  80. Moorman, C., & Rust, R. T. (1999). The role of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 180–197.Google Scholar
  81. Morgan, N. A., Kaleka, A., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2004). Antecedents of export venture performance: A theoretical model and empirical assessment. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 90–108.Google Scholar
  82. Morgan, N. A., Slotegraaf, R. J., & Vorhies, D. W. (2009). Linking marketing capabilities with profit growth. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 284–293.Google Scholar
  83. Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35.Google Scholar
  84. Nath, P., & Mahajan, V. (2008). Chief marketing officers: A study of their presence in firms’ top management teams. Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 65–81.Google Scholar
  85. Nath, P., & Mahajan, V. (2011). Marketing in the c-suite: A study of chief marketing officer power in firms’ top management teams. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 60–77.Google Scholar
  86. Newbert, S. L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 121–146.Google Scholar
  87. Noble, C. H., & Mokwa, M. P. (1999). Implementing marketing strategies: Developing and testing a managerial theory. Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 57–73.Google Scholar
  88. Noble, C. H., Sinha, R. K., & Kumar, A. (2002). Market orientation and alternative strategic orientations: A longitudinal assessment of performance implications. The Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 25–39.Google Scholar
  89. O’Sullivan, D., & Abela, A. V. (2007). Marketing performance measurement ability and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(2), 79–93.Google Scholar
  90. Olson, E. M., Slater, S. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (2005). The performance implications of fit among business strategy, marketing organization structure, and strategic behavior. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 49–65.Google Scholar
  91. Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 136–153.Google Scholar
  92. Payan, J. M., & McFarland, R. G. (2005). Decomposing influence strategies: Argument structure and dependence as determinants of the effectiveness of influence strategies in gaining channel member compliance. Journal of Marketing, 69(July), 66–79.Google Scholar
  93. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Cambridge: Pitman.Google Scholar
  94. Piercy, N. (1985). Marketing organisation: An analysis of information processing, power, and politics. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  95. Piercy, N. F. (1998). Marketing implementation: The implications of marketing paradigm weakness for the strategy execution process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(3), 222–236.Google Scholar
  96. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.Google Scholar
  97. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569.Google Scholar
  98. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industry and competitors. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  99. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  100. Rao, V. R., Agarwal, M. K., & Dahlhoff, D. (2004). How is manifest branding strategy related to the intangible value of a corporation? Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 126–141.Google Scholar
  101. Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 227–251.Google Scholar
  102. Rindfleisch, A., & Heide, J. B. (1997). Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications. Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 30–54.Google Scholar
  103. Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008). Cross-sectional versus longitudinal survey research: A look at common method bias and causal inferencing. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(June), 261–279.Google Scholar
  104. Rouzies, D., Anderson, E., Kohli, A. K., Michaels, R. E., Weitz, B. A., & Zoltners, A. A. (2005). Sales and marketing integration: A proposed framework. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 25(2), 113–122.Google Scholar
  105. Ruekert, R. W., & Walker, O. C., Jr. (1987). Marketing’s interaction with other functional units: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  106. Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004). Return on marketing: Using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 109–127.Google Scholar
  107. Salojärvi, H., Sainio, L.-M., & Tarkiainen, A. (2010). Organizational factors enhancing customer knowledge utilization in the management of key account relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(8), 1395–1402.Google Scholar
  108. Saxe, R., & Weitz, B. A. (1982). The SOCO scale: A measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(3), 343–351.Google Scholar
  109. Schumacker, R. E. (2002). Latent variable interaction modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 40–54.Google Scholar
  110. Sinkula, J. M. (1994). Market information processing and organizational learning. The Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 35–45.Google Scholar
  111. Slater, S. F., & Olson, E. M. (2001). Marketing’s contribution to the implementation of business strategy: An empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 22(11), 1055–1067.Google Scholar
  112. Slotegraaf, R. J., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2011). Product development team stability and new product advantage: The role of decision-making processes. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 96–108.Google Scholar
  113. Song, M., Di Benedetto, C. A., & Nason, R. W. (2007). Capabilities and financial performance: The moderating effect of strategic type. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 18–34.Google Scholar
  114. Sousa, C. M. P., Ruzo, E., & Losada, F. (2010). The key role of managers’ values in exporting: Influence on customer responsiveness and export performance. Journal of International Marketing, 18(2), 1–19.Google Scholar
  115. Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A., & Fahey, L. (1999). Marketing, business processes, and shareholder value: An organizationally embedded view of marketing activities and the discipline of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 168–179.Google Scholar
  116. Starr, R. G., Jr., & Bloom, P. N. (1994). The power relationships of brand managers. Marketing Letters, 5(3), 211–223.Google Scholar
  117. Taghian, M., & Shaw, R. N. (2010). Market fit and business performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(5), 395–415.Google Scholar
  118. Tull, D. S., Cooley, B., Phillips Jr., M., & Watkins, H. (1991). The organization of marketing activities of American manufacturers: Marketing Science InstituteGoogle Scholar
  119. Varadarajan, P. R., & Jayachandran, S. (1999). Marketing strategy: An assessment of the state of the field and outlook. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), 120–143.Google Scholar
  120. Varadarajan, P. R. (2009). Outsourcing: Think more expansively. Journal of Business Research, 62(11), 1165–1172.Google Scholar
  121. Venkatesh, R., Kohli, A. K., & Zaltman, G. (1995). Influence strategies in buying centers. Journal of Marketing, 59(4), 71–82.Google Scholar
  122. Verhoef, P. C., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2009). Understanding the marketing department’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 14–37.Google Scholar
  123. Vijande, M. L. S., Sanzo Pérez, M. J., Álvarez González, L., & Casielles, R. V. (2005). Effects of market orientation on business strategic behavior. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 13(1), 17–42.Google Scholar
  124. Vorhies, D. W., Harker, M., & Rao, C. P. (1999). The capabilities and performance advantages of market-driven firms. European Journal of Marketing, 33(11/12), 1171–1202.Google Scholar
  125. Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. (2003). A configuration theory assessment of marketing organization fit with business strategy and its relationship with marketing performance. Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 100–115.Google Scholar
  126. Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. (2005). Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 80–94.Google Scholar
  127. Webster, F. E., Jr., Malter, A. J., & Ganesan, S. (2005). The decline and dispersion of marketing competence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(4), 35–43.Google Scholar
  128. Workman, J. P., Jr., Homburg, C., & Gruner, K. (1998). Marketing organization: An integrative framework of dimensions and determinants. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 21–41.Google Scholar
  129. Ye, J., Marinova, D., & Singh, J. (2012). Bottom-up learning in marketing frontlines: Conceptualization, processes, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(6), 821–844.Google Scholar
  130. Zahra, S. A., & Nielsen, A. P. (2002). Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), 377–398.Google Scholar
  131. Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael T. Krush
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ravipreet S. Sohi
    • 2
  • Amit Saini
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Management and Marketing, College of BusinessNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA
  2. 2.College of Business AdministrationUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations