Advertisement

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 137–158 | Cite as

Exploring value propositions and service innovation: a service-dominant logic study

  • Per SkålénEmail author
  • Johanna Gummerus
  • Catharina von Koskull
  • Peter R. Magnusson
Original Empirical Research

Abstract

This paper presents an eight-firm study, conducted from the service-dominant logic perspective, which makes a contribution regarding knowledge of the anatomy of value propositions and service innovation. The paper suggests that value propositions are configurations of several different practices and resources. The paper finds that ten common practices, organized in three main aggregates, constitute and fulfill value propositions: i.e. provision practices, representational practices, and management and organizational practices. Moreover, the paper suggests that service innovation can be equated with the creation of new value propositions by means of developing existing or creating new practices and/or resources, or by means of integrating practices and resources in new ways. It identifies four types of service innovation (adaptation, resource-based innovation, practice-based innovation, and combinative innovation) and three types of service innovation processes (practice-based, resource-based, and combinative). The key managerial insight provided by the paper is that service innovation must be conducted and value propositions must be evaluated from the perspective of the customers’ value creation, the service that the customer experiences. Successful service innovation is not only contingent on having the right resources, established methods and practices for integrating these resources into attractive value propositions are also needed.

Keywords

Resource integration Service-dominant logic Service innovation Value proposition 

References

  1. Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2011). Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: a dyadic perspective on the joint problem solving process. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A., & van Rossum, W. (2006). Customer value propositions in business markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 90–99.Google Scholar
  3. Ballantyne, D., & Varey, R. J. (2006). Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: the exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballantyne, D., Frow, P., Varey, R. J., & Payne, A. (2011). Value propositions as communication practice: taking a wider view. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benner, M. J. (2009). Dynamic or static capabilities? Process management practices and response to technological change. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(5), 473–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bititci, U. S., Martinez, V., Albores, P., & Parung, J. (2004). Creating and managing value in collaborative networks. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(3–4), 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bitner, M. J., Faranda, W. T., Hubbert, A. R., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1997). Customer contributions and roles in service delivery. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8(3), 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blazevic, V., & Lievens, A. (2008). Managing innovation through customer coproduced knowledge in electronic services: an exploratory study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 138–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowers, M. R. (1989). Developing new services: improving the process makes it better. Journal of Services Marketing, 3(1), 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cadwaller, S., Jarvis, C. B., Bitner, M. J., & Ostrom, A. (2010). Frontline employee motivation to participate in service innovation implementation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calonius, H. (2006). Contemporary research in marketing: a market behaviour framework. Marketing Theory, 6(4), 419–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, J. S., Tsou, H. T., & Ching, R. K. H. (2011). Co-production and its effects on service innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1331–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crawford, C. M., & Di Benedetto, A. (2000). New products management. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. De Brentani, U. (2001). Innovative versus incremental new business services: different keys for achieving success. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(3), 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Droege, H., Hildebrand, D., & Heras Forcada, M. A. (2009). Innovation in services: present findings, and future pathways. Journal of Service Management, 20(2), 131–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Echeverri, P., & Skålén, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction: a practice theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., & Gruber, T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  20. Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2008). The value propositions concept: Evolution, development and application in marketing. Discipline of Marketing, University of Sydney, Sydney, working paper.Google Scholar
  21. Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2011). A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuglsang, L., & Sørensen, F. (2010). The balance between bricolage and innovation: management dilemmas in sustainable public innovation. Service Industries Journal, 31(4), 581–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26, 537–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  25. Grönroos, C. (2008). Service logic revisited: who creates value? And who co-creates. European Business Review, 20(4), 298–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grönroos, C. (2009). Marketing as promise management: regaining customer management for marketing. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24(5/6), 351–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: a critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gummerus, J. (2013). Value creation processes and value outcomes in marketing theory—strangers or siblings? Marketing Theory, 13(1), 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heinonen, K., Strandvik, T., Mickelsson, K.-J., Edvardsson, B., Sundström, E., & Andersson, P. (2010). A customer-dominant logic of service. Journal of Service Management, 21(4), 531–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoyer, W. D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., & Singh, S. S. (2010). Consumer cocreation in new product development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Karpen, I. O., Bove, L. L., & Lukas, B. A. (2012). Linking service-dominant logic and strategic business practice: a conceptual model of a service-dominant orientation. Journal of Service Research, 15(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelly, D., & Storey, C. (2000). New service development: initiation strategies. International Journal of Services Industry Management, 11(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Korkman, O., Storbacka, K., & Harald, B. (2010). Practices as markets: value co-creation in e-invoicing. Australasian Marketing Journal, 18(4), 236–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kowalkowski, C. (2011). Dynamics of value propositions: insights from service-dominant logic. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lanning, M. J., & Michaels, E. G. (1988). A business is a value delivery system. Staff paper, McKinsey & Company.Google Scholar
  37. Lindic, J., & Marques da Silva, C. (2011). Value proposition as a catalyst for a customer focused innovation. Management Decision, 49(10), 1694–1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & O’Brien, M. (2007). Competing through service: insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Madhavaram, S., & Hunt, S. D. (2008). The service-dominant logic and a hierarchy of operant resources: developing masterful operant resources and implications for marketing strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McKinsey. (2000). Delivering value to customers. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/strategy/delivering_value_to_customers, 2013-10-10.
  41. Melton, H. L., & Hartline, M. D. (2010). Customer and frontline employee influence on new service development performance. Journal of Service Research, 13(4), 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Menor, L. J., Tatikonda, M. V., & Sampson, S. E. (2002). New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Michel, S., Brown, S., & Gallan, A. (2008). An expanded and strategic view of discontinuous innovations: deploying a service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 54–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2004). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. O’Dell, C., & Grayson, C. J., Jr. (1999). Knowledge transfer: discover your value proposition. Strategy & Leadership, 27(2), 10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ordanini, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Service innovation viewed through a service-dominant logic lens: a conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Journal of Service Research, 14(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ouschan, R., Sweeney, J., & Johnson, L. (2006). Customer empowerment and relationship outcomes in healthcare consultations. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9/10), 1068–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Papastathopoulou, P., & Hultink, E. J. (2012). New service development: an analysis of 27 years of research. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(5), 705–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Payne, A., Ballantyne, D., & Christopher, M. (2005). A stakeholder approach to relationship marketing strategy: the development and use of the “six markets” model. European Journal of Marketing, 39(7/8), 855–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Perks, H., & Riihela, N. (2004). An exploration of inter-functional integration in the new service development process. Service Industries Journal, 24(6), 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Promise. (1998). Collins English dictionary. Glasgow: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  52. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rubalcaba, L., Michel, S., Sundbo, J., Brown, S. W., & Reynoso, J. (2012). Shaping, organizing, and rethinking service innovation: a multidimensional framework. Journal of Service Management, 23(5), 696–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scheuing, E. E., & Johnson, E. M. (1989). A proposed model for new service development. Journal of Services Marketing, 3(2), 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Solomon, M. R., Surprenant, C., Czepiel, J. A., & Gutman, E. G. (1985). A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: the service encounter. Journal of Marketing, 49, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Strandvik, T., Holmlund, M., & Edvardsson, B. (2012). Customer needing: a challenge for the seller offering. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 27(2), 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Sundbo, J. (1997). Management of innovation in services. Service Industries Journal, 3, 432–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Terho, H., Haas, A., Eggert, A., & Ulaga, W. (2012). ‘It’s almost like taking the sales out of selling’—towards a conceptualization of value-based selling in business markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 174–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Toivonen, M., & Tuominen, T. (2009). Emergence of innovations in services. Service Industries Journal, 29(7), 887–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004a). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004b). The four service marketing myths: remnants of a goods-based, manufacturing model. Journal of Service Research, 6(4), 324–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Service-dominant logic: What is it, what it is not, what it might be. In S. L. Vargo & R. F. Lusch (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions (pp. 43–56). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  66. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008a). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008b). Why “service”? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wallendorf, M., & Belk, R. W. (1989). Assessing trustworthiness in naturalistic consumer research. In E. C. Hirschman (Ed.), Interpretative consumer research (pp. 69–84). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  69. Zomerdijk, L. G., & Voss, C. A. (2011). NSD processes and practices in experiential services. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Per Skålén
    • 1
    Email author
  • Johanna Gummerus
    • 2
  • Catharina von Koskull
    • 2
  • Peter R. Magnusson
    • 1
  1. 1.Service Research CenterKarlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden
  2. 2.Centre for Relationship Marketing and Service Management (CERS)Hanken School of EconomicsHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations