Exploring value propositions and service innovation: a service-dominant logic study
- 7k Downloads
This paper presents an eight-firm study, conducted from the service-dominant logic perspective, which makes a contribution regarding knowledge of the anatomy of value propositions and service innovation. The paper suggests that value propositions are configurations of several different practices and resources. The paper finds that ten common practices, organized in three main aggregates, constitute and fulfill value propositions: i.e. provision practices, representational practices, and management and organizational practices. Moreover, the paper suggests that service innovation can be equated with the creation of new value propositions by means of developing existing or creating new practices and/or resources, or by means of integrating practices and resources in new ways. It identifies four types of service innovation (adaptation, resource-based innovation, practice-based innovation, and combinative innovation) and three types of service innovation processes (practice-based, resource-based, and combinative). The key managerial insight provided by the paper is that service innovation must be conducted and value propositions must be evaluated from the perspective of the customers’ value creation, the service that the customer experiences. Successful service innovation is not only contingent on having the right resources, established methods and practices for integrating these resources into attractive value propositions are also needed.
KeywordsResource integration Service-dominant logic Service innovation Value proposition
- Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A., & van Rossum, W. (2006). Customer value propositions in business markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 90–99.Google Scholar
- Crawford, C. M., & Di Benedetto, A. (2000). New products management. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
- Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2008). The value propositions concept: Evolution, development and application in marketing. Discipline of Marketing, University of Sydney, Sydney, working paper.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Lanning, M. J., & Michaels, E. G. (1988). A business is a value delivery system. Staff paper, McKinsey & Company.Google Scholar
- McKinsey. (2000). Delivering value to customers. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/strategy/delivering_value_to_customers, 2013-10-10.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2004). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Promise. (1998). Collins English dictionary. Glasgow: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Service-dominant logic: What is it, what it is not, what it might be. In S. L. Vargo & R. F. Lusch (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions (pp. 43–56). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
- Wallendorf, M., & Belk, R. W. (1989). Assessing trustworthiness in naturalistic consumer research. In E. C. Hirschman (Ed.), Interpretative consumer research (pp. 69–84). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar