Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 547–566

Understanding social media effects across seller, retailer, and consumer interactions

  • Adam Rapp
  • Lauren Skinner Beitelspacher
  • Dhruv Grewal
  • Douglas E. Hughes
Original Empirical Research

Abstract

In this research, the authors propose a contagion effect of social media use across business suppliers, retailers, and consumers. After developing and validating social media usage measures at three levels—supplier, retailer, and customer—the authors test social media contagion effects and their ultimate impact on multiple performance measures. The conceptual framework and empirical results offer new insights into the contagion effects of social media usage across the channel of distribution as well as important social influence mechanisms that enhance these effects. Consistent with the predictions, social media use positively contributes to brand performance, retailer performance, and consumer–retailer loyalty. Also, the effect of supplier social media usage on retailer social media usage and in turn on customer social media usage is moderated by brand reputation and service ambidexterity. With the ever-increasing growth and adoption of social media applications and similar technologies, this research provides a framework to promote usage by supply channel partners which ultimately influences performance-related outcomes.

Keywords

Social media Salespeople Retailer Contagion Buyer–supplier relationships Relationship marketing 

References

  1. Aggarwal, P. (2004). The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, E., Lodish, L., & Weitz, B. (1987). Resource allocation behavior in conventional channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(1), 254–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angst, C. M., Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Kelley, K. (2010). Social contagion and information technology diffusion: the adoption of electronic medical records in U.S. hospitals. Management Science, 56(8), 1219–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aral, S., & Walker, D. (2011). Creating social contagion through viral product design: a randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Science, 57(9), 1623–1639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., & Morales, A. C. (2008). Positive consumer contagion: responses to attractive others in a retail context. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 690–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bagozzi, R. P. (1975). Marketing as exchange. Journal of Marketing, 39(October), 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bagozzi, R. P. (1992). The self-regulation of attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2), 178–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science, 15(5), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bliese, P. D., & Hanges, P. (2004). Being both too liberal and too conservative: the perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods, 7(4), 400–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradley, A. J. and McDonald, M. P. (2012). Most organization still fear social media. Harvard Business Review Blog Network, http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2012/07/most_organizations_still_fear.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+harvardbusiness+%28HBR.org%29..
  12. Brin, D. W. (2011). “Retailers use social media to fine-tune operations,” CNBC.com, October 28, 2011.Google Scholar
  13. Burkhardt, M. E., & Brass, D. J. (1990). Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 104–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. The American Journal of Sociology, 9(4), 311–332.Google Scholar
  15. Campalyst (2011). Top 250 Internet Retailers on Social Media, https://www.campalyst.com/top-250-internet-retailers-on-social-media.
  16. Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Collier, J. E., & Sherrell, D. L. (2010). Examining the influence of control and convenience in a self-service setting. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 490–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Contractor, N. S., & Eisenberg, E. M. (1990). Communication networks and new media in organizations. In J. Fulk & C. W. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 143–172). Newberry Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Crittenden, V. L., Peterson, R. A., & Albaum, G. (2010). Technology and business-to-consumer selling: contemplating research and practice. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 30(2), 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1999). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Du, R. Y., & Kamakura, W. A. (2011). Measuring contagion in the diffusion of consumer packaged goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(1), 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (1998). Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Erickson, B. H. (1988). The relational basis of attitudes. In S. Berkowitz & B. Wellman (Eds.), Social structures: a network approach (pp. 99–121). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Evanschitzky, H., Ramaseshan, B., Woisetschlager, D. M., Richelsen, V., Blut, M., & Backhaus, C. (2012). Consequences of customer loyalty to the loyalty program and to the company. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 625–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60(October), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fournier, S. (1995). Toward the development of relationship theory at the level of the product and the brand. Advances in Consumer Research, 22(1), 661–662.Google Scholar
  29. Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(4), 343–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Galaskiewicz, J., & Burt, R. S. (1991). Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1), 88–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Godfrey, A., Seiders, K., & Voss, G. B. (2011). Enough Is enough! The fine line in executing multichannel relational communication. Journal of Marketing, 75(July), 94–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grayson, K. (2007). Friendship versus business in marketing relationships. Journal of Marketing, 71(October), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Greenberg, P. (2010). The impact of CRM 2.0 on customer insight. The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 25(6), 410–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grewal, R., & Dharwadkar, R. (2002). The role of the institutional environment in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 66(2), 82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gulati, R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4), 619–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? The American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Holden-Bache, A. (2011). Study: 93% of B2B marketers use social media marketing. BtoB Magazine, April 18.Google Scholar
  39. Homburg, C., Wieseke, J., & Kuehnl, C. (2010). Social influence on salespeople’s adoption of sales technology: a multilevel analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hughes, D. E., & Ahearne, M. (2010). Energizing the reseller’s sales force: the power of brand identification. Journal of Marketing, 74(July), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Insites Consulting (2011). “Social integration survey,” unpublished data set, Ghent, Belgium.Google Scholar
  42. Iyengar, R., Van den Bulte, C., & Valente, T. W. (2011). Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Science, 30(2), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jasmand, C., Blazevic, V., & de Ruyter, K. (2012). Generating sales while providing service: a study of customer service representatives’ ambidextrous behavior. Journal of Marketing, 76(January), 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kozinets, R. V., de Valck, K., Wojnicki, A., & Sarah, J. S. (2010). Networked narratives: understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(March), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kulviwat, S., Bruner, G. C., II, & Al-Shuridah, O. (2008). The role of social influence on adoption of high tech innovations: the moderating effect of public/private consumption. Journal of Business Research, 62, 706–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lam, S. K., Kraus, F., & Ahearne, M. (2010). The diffusion of market orientation throughout the organization: a social learning theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 74(3), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Latane, B. (2000). Pressures to uniformity and the evolution of cultural norms: modeling dynamic social impact. In D. Ilgen & C. Hulin (Eds.), Computational modeling of behavior in organization: the third scientific discipline (pp. 189–220). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Levy, S. (1959). Symbols for sale. Harvard Business Review, 37(4), 117–124.Google Scholar
  50. Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mahajan, V., Muller, E., & Wind, Y. (2000). New-product diffusion models. Springer.Google Scholar
  52. McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F. (2002). Building brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McFarland, R. G., Bloodgood, J. M., & Payan, J. M. (2008). Supply chain contagion. Journal of Marketing, 72(March), 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mittal, V., Huppertz, J., & Khare, A. (2008). Customer complaining: the role of tie strength and information control. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mohr, J. J., Fisher, R. J., & Nevin, J. R. (1996). Collaborative communication in interfirm relationships: moderating effects of integration and control. Journal of Marketing, 60(July), 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Muniz, A. M., & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–257.Google Scholar
  58. Nelson, R. E. (1989). The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nielsen AC (2010). What Americans do online: social media and games dominate activity. Nielsen Mobile Media View Internet. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com
  60. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  62. O’Reilly, C., III, & Tushman, M. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: how managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53(4), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100–130.Google Scholar
  64. Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989). Customer perceptions of interpersonal equity and satisfaction in transactions: a field survey approach. Journal of Marketing, 53(April), 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Palmatier, R. W. (2007). What drives customer relationship value in business-to-business exchanges? Marketing Science Institute Report, (07–118), Issue 4.Google Scholar
  66. Palmatier, R., Dant, R., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. (2006). A meta-analysis on the antecedents and consequences of relationship marketing mediators: insight intokey moderators. Journal of Marketing, 70(October), 136–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Palmatier, R. W., Scheer, L. K., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2007a). Customer loyalty to whom? Managing the benefits and risks of salesperson-owned loyalty. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R., & Grewal, D. (2007b). A longitudinal analysis of theoretical perspectives of interorganizational relationship performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(October), 172–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Park, C. W., MacInnis, D. J., Priester, J., Eisingerich, A., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: Conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. Journal of Marketing, 74(November), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Polansky, N., Lippitt, R., & Redl, F. (1950). An investigation of behavioral contagion in groups. Human Relations., 3, 310–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rapp, A., Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, T. (2010). Managing sales teams in a virtual environment. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(3), 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  73. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. I. (1996). The media equation. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  74. Reichheld, F. F. (1996). The loyalty effect. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  75. Rossiter, J. R., & Percy, L. (1987). Advertising and promotion management. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  76. Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2005). Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(4), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shankar, V., Smith, A. K., & Rangaswamy, A. (2003). Customer satisfaction and loyalty in online and offline environments. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(2), 153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shrauger, J. S. (1975). Responses to evaluation as a function of initial self-perceptions. Psychological Bulletin Psychological Bulletin, 82(4), 581–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sprott, D., Spangenberg, E., & Czellar, S. (2009). The importance of a general measure of brand engagement on market behavior: development and validation of a scale. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(1), 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Trainor, K. (2012). Relating social media technologies to performance: a capabilities-based perspective. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 32(3), 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van den Bulte, C., & Wuyts, S. (2007). Social networks and marketing. Cambridge: MSI.Google Scholar
  82. VanBoskirk, S., Overby, C. S., McGann, J., & McGann, J. (2009). US interactive marketing forecast: 2009 to 2014. Cambridge: Forrester Research.Google Scholar
  83. Veloutsou, C., & Moutinho, L. (2009). Brand relationships through brand reputation and brand tribalism. Journal of Business Research, 62(3), 314–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wang, L. C., Baker, J., Wagner, J. A., & Wakefield, K. (2007). Can a retail web site be social? Journal of Marketing, 71(July), 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wilkie, W. L. (1986). Consumer behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  86. Wooldridge, B., & Floyd, S. W. (1989). Strategic process effects on consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 10(3), 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yim, C. K., Tse, D. K., & Chan, K. W. (2008). Strengthening customer loyalty through intimacy and passion: roles of customer-firm affection and customer-staff relationships in services. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 741–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisitions, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 587–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Yu, T., Patterson, P., & de Ruyter, K. (2010). Acting ambidextrously in retail banking to achieve service and sales goals simultaneously: A multilevel perspective. ANZMAC 2010, Christchurch, New Zealand, November.Google Scholar
  90. Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(April), 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Rapp
    • 1
  • Lauren Skinner Beitelspacher
    • 2
  • Dhruv Grewal
    • 3
  • Douglas E. Hughes
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Marketing and ManagementUniversity of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA
  2. 2.Department of MarketingPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA
  3. 3.Department of MarketingBabson UniversityBabson ParkUSA
  4. 4.Department of MarketingMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations