Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 400–417 | Cite as

Activation of country stereotypes: automaticity, consonance, and impact

Original Empirical Research

Abstract

Country-of-origin (COO) research typically regards COO cue usage as a conscious and controlled process dependent on consumers’ intention to use COO information. However, emerging evidence indicates that country stereotypes can affect consumers’ brand evaluations regardless of intention. In three complementary experiments, this study investigates how the mere presence of country cues can trigger different kinds of country stereotypes (functional vs. emotional) which subsequently automatically influence consumers’ cognitive and affective brand evaluations as well as brand-related behavior. Findings confirm the automatic influence of country stereotypes and suggest that brand evaluations and brand-related behavior are enhanced when the underlying country stereotype matches the advertising execution format. On the other hand, mismatches can result in adverse effects. A follow-up study further reveals that cognitive and affective brand evaluations mediate COO effects on brand-related behavior. Theoretical and managerial implications of the findings are considered and future research directions identified.

Keywords

Country stereotypes Country of origin effects Automatic cue processing cognitive dissonance 

References

  1. Ahmed, Z. U., Johnson, J. P., Yang, X., Fatt, C. K., Teng, H. S., & Boon, L. C. (2004). Does country of origin matter for low-involvement products? International Marketing Review, 21(1), 102–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. E. (1973). Consumer dissatisfaction: the effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(1), 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Areni, C. S., & Cox, K. C. (1994). The persuasive effects of evaluation, expectancy and relevancy dimensions of incongruent visual and verbal information. In C. T. Allen & D. Roedder John (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 21, pp. 337–342). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  4. Arnett, D. B., German, S. D., & Hunt, S. D. (2003). The identity salience model of relationship marketing success: the case of nonprofit marketing. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Askegaard, S., & Ger, G. (1998). Product-country images: Towards a contextualized approach. In B. G. Englis & A. Olofsson (Eds.), European advances in consumer research (Vol. 3, pp. 50–58). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  6. Balabanis, G., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2008). Brand origin identification by consumers: a consumer classification perspective. Journal of International Marketing, 16(1), 39–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7(3), 136–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, efficiency, intention, and control in social cognition. In J. R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 1–40). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1990). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blair, I. V., & Banaji, M. R. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1142–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bloemer, J., Brijs, K., & Kasper, H. (2009). The COO-ELM model: a theoretical framework for the cognitive processes underlying country of origin-effects. European Journal of Marketing, 43(1/2), 62–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bredahl, L. (2003). Cue utilisation and quality perception with regard to branded beef. Food Quality and Preference, 15(1), 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chattalas, M., Kramer, T., & Takada, H. (2008). The impact of national stereotypes on the country of origin effect—a conceptual framework. International Marketing Review, 25(1), 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: the automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diamantopoulos, A., & Zeugner-Roth, K. P. (2011). Country-of-origin as brand element. In D. C. Bello & D. A. Griffith (Eds.), Wiley international encyclopaedia of marketing, vol. 6 (pp. 18–22).Google Scholar
  17. Diamantopoulos, A., Smith, G., & Grime, I. (2005). The impact of brand extensions on the brand personality: experimental evidence. European Journal of Marketing, 39(1/2), 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B., & Palihawadana, D. (2011). The relationship between country-of-origin image and brand image as drivers of purchase intentions: a test of alternative perspectives. International Marketing Review, 28(5), 508–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dobni, D., & Zinkhan, G. M. (1990). In search of brand image: A foundation analysis. In M. E. Goldberg, G. Gorn, & R. W. Pollay (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 17, pp. 110–119). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  20. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gawronski, B., LeBel, E. P., & Peters, K. R. (2007). What do implicit measures tell us? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(2), 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldberg, M. E., & Gorn, G. J. (1987). Happy and sad TV programs: how they affect reactions to commercials. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Golden, L. L., & Johnson, K. A. (1983). The impact of sensory preference and thinking versus feeling appeals on advertising effectiveness. In R. Bagozzi & A. Tybout (Eds.), Advances in consumer research volume, vol. 10. Provo: Association of Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  27. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved September 26, 2012 from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
  29. Heckler, S. E., & Childers, T. L. (1992). The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: what is incongruency? Journal of Consumer Research, 18(4), 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hennebichler, P. (2007). Country of origin knowledge: Insights into consumers’ knowledge. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.Google Scholar
  31. Heslop, L. A., & Papadopoulos, N. (1993). But who knows where or when? Reflections on the images of countries and their products. In N. Papadopoulos & L. A. Heslop (Eds.), Product-country images: Impact and role in international marketing (pp. 39–76). New York: International Business Press.Google Scholar
  32. Holloway, R. J. (1967). An experiment on consumer dissonance. Journal of Marketing, 31(1), 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hong, S.-T., & Wyer, R. S. J. (1989). Effects of country-of-origin and product-attribute information on product evaluation: an information processing perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hong, S.-T., & Wyer, R. S. J. (1990). Determinants of product evaluation: effects of the time interval between knowledge of a product’s country of origin and information about its specific attributes. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jaffe, E. D., & Nebenzahl, I. D. (2006). National image and competitive advantage: The theory and practice of place branding (2nd ed.). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  36. Josiassen, A., & Harzing, A.-W. (2008). Descending from the ivory tower: reflections on the relevance and future of country-of-origin research. European Management Review, 5(4), 264–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kahle, L. R., & Homer, P. M. (1985). Physical attractiveness of the celebrity endorser: a social adaptation perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 954–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kamins, M. A. (1990). An investigation into the ‘match-up’ hypothesis in celebrity advertising: when beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Katz, D., & Braly, K. W. (1933). Racial stereotypes of 100 college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28(3), 280–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Keller, K. L., & Aaker, D. A. (1992). The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kim, J., Allen, C. T., & Kardes, F. R. (1996). An investigation of the mediational mechanisms underlying attitudinal conditioning. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(3), 318–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leclerc, F., Schmitt, B. H., & Dubé, L. (1994). Foreign branding and its effects on product perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liefeld, J. P. (2004). Consumer knowledge and use of country-of-origin information at the point of purchase. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(2), 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liu, S. S., & Johnson, K. F. (2005). The automatic country-of-origin effects on brand judgments. Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Magnusson, P., Westjohn, S. A., & Zdravkovic, S. (2011). “What? I thought Samsung was Japanese”: accurate or not, perceived country of origin matters. International Marketing Review, 28(5), 454–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maheswaran, D. (1994). Country of origin as a stereotype: effects of consumer expertise and attribute strength on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 354–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mantel, S. P., & Kellaris, J. J. (2003). Cognitive determinants of consumers time perceptions: the impact of resources required and available. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 531–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Martin, B., Lee, M. S. W., & Lacey, C. (2011). Countering negative country of origin effects using imagery processing. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(2), 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mittal, B. (1989). A theoretical analysis of two recent measures of involvement. In T. K. Srull (Ed.), Advances in consumer research, vol. 16 (pp. 697–702). Provo: UT Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  51. Olson, J. C., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Cue utilization in the quality perception process. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research. Chicago.Google Scholar
  52. Oshikawa, S. (1969). Can cognitive dissonance theory explain consumer behavior? Journal of Marketing, 33(4), 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Osterhouse, R. A., & Brock, T. C. (1970). Distraction increases yielding to propaganda by inhibiting counter-arguing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(4), 344–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Papadopoulos, N., Banna, A. e., Murphy, S. A., & Rojas-Méndez, J. I. (2011). Place brands and brand-place associations: The role of ‘place’ in international marketing. In S. C. Jain & D. Griffith (Eds.), Handbook of research in international marketing (Secondth ed., pp. 88–113). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  55. Peabody, D. (1985). National characteristics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Perdue, B. C., & Summer, J. O. (1986). Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(4), 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Peterson, R. A., & Jolibert, A. J. P. (1995). A meta-analysis of country-of-origin effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4), 883–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Plutchik, R. (Ed.). (1993). Emotions and their vicissitudes: Emotions and psychopathology. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  59. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008a). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008b). Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. In A. F. Hayes, M. D. Slater, & L. B. Synder (Eds.), The sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research (pp. 13–54). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  61. Richins, M. L. (1997). Measuring emotions in consumption experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Roth, M. S., & Romeo, J. B. (1992). Matching product category and country-of-origin effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(2), 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Samiee, S. (1994). Customer evaluation of products in a global market. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(3), 579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Samiee, S. (2010). Advancing the country image construct—a commentary essay. Journal of Business Research, 63(4), 442–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Samiee, S. (2011). Resolving the impasse regarding research on the origins of products and brands. International Marketing Review, 28(5), 473–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Samiee, S., & Leonidou, L. C. (2011). Relevance and rigor in international marketing research: Developments in product and brand origin line of inquiry. In S. C. Jain & D. A. Griffith (Eds.), Handbook of research in international marketing (2nd ed., pp. 68–87). Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  67. Samiee, S., Shimp, T. A., & Sharma, S. (2005). Brand origin recognition accuracy: its antecedents and consumers’ cognitive limitations. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Srull, T. K. (1981). Person memory: some tests of associative storage and retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7(6), 440–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tse, D. K., & Gorn, G. J. (1993). An experiment on the salience of country-of-origin in the era of global brands. Journal of International Marketing, 1(1), 57–76.Google Scholar
  72. Usunier, J.-C. (2006). Relevance in business research: the case of country-of-crigin research in marketing. European Management Review, 3(1), 60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Usunier, J.-C. (2011). The shift from manufacturing to brand origin: suggestions for improving coo relevance. International Marketing Review, 28(5), 486–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Usunier, J.-C., & Cestre, G. (2008). Further considerations on the relevance of country-of-origin research. European Management Review, 5(4), 271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Verlegh, P. W. J., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (1999). A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(5), 521–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Verlegh, P. W. J., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Meulenberg, M. T. G. (2005). Country-of-origin effects in consumer processing of advertising claims. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(2), 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Westjohn, S. A., & Magnusson, P. (2011). Theory of the global consumer. In S. C. Jain & D. A. Griffith (Eds.), Handbook of research in international marketing (2nd ed., pp. 317–332). Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  79. Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yoo, C., & MacInnis, D. (2005). The brand attitude formation process of emotional and informational ads. Journal of Business Research, 58(10), 1397–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. The Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zeugner-Roth, K. P., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2010). Advancing the country image construct: reply to Samiee’s (2009) commentary. Journal of Business Research, 62(7), 726–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations