Advertisement

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 1–18 | Cite as

This ad’s for you: the indirect effect of advertising perceptions on salesperson effort and performance

  • Douglas E. HughesEmail author
Original Empirical Research

Abstract

Considerable research explores advertising’s role in influencing consumer perceptions and behavior. However, advertising’s impact on another key audience—the sales force—has been largely overlooked. Drawing from social identity and expectancy theories, and using survey and objective performance data across multiple wholesalers, the authors demonstrate that a salesperson’s perception of brand advertising has a significant effect on salesperson effort and performance by positively influencing the extent to which the salesperson identifies with the brand and his or her expectancy that such effort will generate results. These effects are moderated by internal communications and brand size. Model results suggest that advertising’s role may extend beyond “pull” to “push” by motivating salespeople to exert more effort on behalf of a brand. As a result, firms should take steps to proactively manage salesperson perceptions of brand advertising while also considering this dual role when assessing advertising effectiveness and efficiency.

Keywords

Salesperson Advertising Brand identification Expectancy Effort Sales performance Internal marketing 

References

  1. Ahearne, M., Rapp, A., Hughes, D. E., & Jindal, R. (2010). Managing sales force product perceptions and control systems in the success of new product introductions. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(4), 764–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, E., Lodish, L. M., & Weitz, B. A. (1987). Resource allocation behavior in conventional channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(1), 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagozzi, R. P. (1980). Causal models in marketing. NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: a review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: a framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: on being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, S. P., & Peterson, R. A. (1994). The effect of effort on sales performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 58, 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, S. P., & Stayman, D. M. (1992). Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: a meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods Research, 33(2), 261–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chonko, L. (1986). Organizational commitment in the sales force. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 6, 19–27.Google Scholar
  14. Christensen, L. T. (1995). Buffering organizational identity in the marketing culture. Organization Studies, 16(4), 651–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), 366–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: LEA.Google Scholar
  18. Dandridge, T. C., Mitroff, I., & Joyce, W. F. (1980). Organizational symbolism: a topic to expand organizational analysis. Academy of Management Review, 5, 77–82.Google Scholar
  19. Donavan, D. T., Janda, S., & Suh, J. (2006). Environmental influences in corporate brand identification and outcomes. Brand Management, 14(1/2), 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duncan, T., & Moriarty, S. E. (1998). A communication-based marketing model for managing relationships. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You are what they eat: the influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychological, 73(3), 421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frayne, C. A., & Geringer, J. M. (2000). Self-management training for improving job performance: a field experiment involving salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gardner, M. P. (1985). Does attitude toward the ad affect brand attitude under a brand evaluation set? Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 192–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gatignon, H., & Hanssens, D. M. (1987). Modeling marketing interactions with application to salesforce effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. George, W. R., & Berry, L. L. (1981). Guidelines for advertising services. Business Horizons, 24, 52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilly, M. C., & Wolfinbarger, M. (1998). Advertising’s internal audience. Journal of Marketing, 62, 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gopalakrishna, S., & Chatterjee, R. (1992). A communications response model for a mature industrial product: application and implications. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(2), 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hatch, M. J. (1993). The dynamics of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review, 18, 657–693.Google Scholar
  32. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hughes, D. E., & Ahearne, M. (2010). Energizing the reseller’s sales force: the power of brand identification. Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirmani, A. (1990). The effect of perceived advertising costs on brand perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 160–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kotler, P., Rackham, N., & Krishnaswamy, S. (2006). Ending the war between sales and marketing. Harvard Business Review, 84(7/8), 68–78.Google Scholar
  36. Kuenzel, S., & Halliday, S. V. (2008). Investigating antecedents and consequences of brand identification. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 17(5), 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laczniak, R. N., & Muehling, D. D. (1993). Toward a better understanding of the role of advertising message involvement. Psychology & Marketing, 10(4), 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lusch, R. L., Vargo, S. L., & Tanniru, M. (2010). Service, value-networks, and learning. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(1), 19–31.Google Scholar
  39. Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2004). The influence of violations of assumptions on multilevel parameter estimates and their standard errors. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 46, 427–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: a test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1993). The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of salesperson performance. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Markus, H. (1983). Self knowledge: an expanded view. Journal of Personality, 51, 543–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller, N., & Marks, G. (1982). Assumed similarity between self and other: effect of expectation of future interaction with that other. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45(2), 100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miniard, P. W., Bhatla, S., & Rose, R. L. (1990). On the formation and relationship of ad and brand attitudes: an experimental and causal analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mitchell, C. (2002). Selling the brand inside. Harvard Business Review, 80(1), 99–105.Google Scholar
  50. Morrill, J. E. (1970). Industrial advertising pays off. Harvard Business Review, 48, 4–14.Google Scholar
  51. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
  52. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rand, T. M., & Wexley, K. N. (1975). Demonstration of the effect ‘similar to me’ in simulated employment interviews. Psychological Reports, 36, 535–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Scholl, R. W. (1981). Differentiating organizational commitment from expectancy as a motivating force. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 589–599.Google Scholar
  57. Schramm, W. (1973). Men, messages, and media: A look at human communication. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  58. Smith, T. M., Gopalakrishna, S., & Chatterjee, R. (2006). A three-stage model of integrated marketing communications at the marketing-sales interface. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(4), 564–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Spiro, R. L., Rich, G. A., & Stanton, W. J. (2008). Management of a sales force. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  60. Srivistava, R., Strutton, D., & Pelton, L. E. (2001). The will to win: an investigation of how sales managers can improve the quantitative aspects of their sales force’s effort. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9, 11–26.Google Scholar
  61. Stohl, C. (1995). Organizational communication: Correctedness in action (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Swinyard, W. R., & Ray, M. L. (1977). Advertising-selling interactions: an attribution theory experiment. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(4), 509–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  64. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  65. Walker, O. C., Churchill, G. A., Jr., & Ford, N. M. (1977). Motivation and performance in industrial selling: present knowledge and needed research. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 156–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wieseke, J., Ahearne, M., Lam, S. K., & van Dick, R. (2009). The role of leaders in internal marketing. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wolfinbarger, M. F., & Gilly, M. C. (2005). “How firm advertising affects employees’ trust, organizational identification, and customer focus,” MSI Reports, 05-002 (2), 20–39Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eli Broad College of BusinessMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations