Advertisement

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 807–820 | Cite as

Achieving brand loyalty through sponsorship: the role of fit and self-congruity

  • Marc MazodierEmail author
  • Dwight Merunka
Original Empirical Research

Abstract

Managers increasingly seek to develop brand loyalty through sponsorship activities, though this relationship has not been solidly established. This article models and demonstrates the impact of sponsorship on brand loyalty. The studied concepts and relationships emerge from both the sponsorship and consumer-brand relationship literature. The experimental design relies on before and after measurements and multiple exposures to the sponsorship. Thus this study demonstrates that sponsorship exposure has a positive impact on brand affect, brand trust, and brand loyalty. The change in brand loyalty from before to after sponsorship exposure reflects two persuasion processes. First, self-congruity with an event enhances brand loyalty through event and brand affect. Second, perceived fit between the event and the brand has a positive effect on brand affect, through attitude toward the sponsorship, and on brand trust, such that it ultimately influences brand loyalty. Brand affect is identified as an important mediator of sponsorship effects.

Keywords

Sponsorship Brand loyalty Brand affect Brand trust Self-congruity Fit 

References

  1. Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building strong brands. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aaker, D. L., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Barone, M. J., Shimp, T. A., & Sprott, D. E. (1999). Product ownership as a moderator of self-congruity effects. Marketing Letters, 10(1), 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker-Olsen, K., & Simmons, C. J. (2002). When do social sponsorships enhance or dilute equity? Fit, message source, and the persistence of effects. In S. M. Broniarczyk & K. Nakamato (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 287–289). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  7. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significant tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bollen, K. A., & Long, S. J. (1992). Tests for structural equation models: Introduction. Sociological Methods and Research, 21(2), 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, J. M., Cornwell, T. B., & Pruitt, S. W. (2002). Corporate stadium sponsorships, signaling theory, agency conflicts, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Advertising Research, 42(6), 16–32.Google Scholar
  11. Cliff, S. J., & Motion, J. (2005). Building contemporary brands: A sponsorship-based strategy. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1068–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cobanoglu, L. J., Warde, B., & Moreo, P. J. (2001). A comparison of mail, fax and web-based survey methods. International Journal of Market Research, 43(4), 441–452.Google Scholar
  13. Cornwell, T. B. (2008). State of the art and science in sponsorship-linked marketing. Journal of Advertising, 37, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cornwell, T. B., Roy, D. P., & Steinard, E. A. (2001). Exploring managers’ perceptions of the impact of sponsorship on brand equity. Journal of Advertising, 30, 41–52.Google Scholar
  15. Cornwell, T. B., Weeks, C. S., & Roy, D. P. (2005). Sponsorship-linked marketing: Opening the black box. Journal of Advertising, 34, 21–42.Google Scholar
  16. Crimmins, J., & Horn, M. (1996). Sponsorship: From management ego trip to marketing success. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(4), 11–21.Google Scholar
  17. D’Astous, A., & Bitz, P. (1995). Consumer evaluations of sponsorship programmes. European Journal of Marketing, 29(12), 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dalakas, V., & Levin, A. M. (2005). The balance theory domino: How sponsorships may elicit negative consumer attitudes. In Menon & A. R. Rao (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 91–97). Duluth: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  19. De Houwer, J. (2009). Conditioning as a source of liking: There is nothing simple about it. In M. Wänke (Ed.), Frontiers of social psychology: The social psychology of consumer behavior (pp. 151–166). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dean, D. H. (1999). Brand endorsement, popularity, and event sponsorship as advertising cues affecting consumer pre-purchase attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 28, 2–12.Google Scholar
  21. Delgado-Ballester, E., Munuera-Alemán, J. L., & Yaguë-Guillén, J. M. (2003). Development and validation of a brand trust scale. International Journal of Market Research, 45(1), 35–53.Google Scholar
  22. Deutskens, E. C., de Jong, A., de Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2006). Comparing the generalizability of online and mail surveys in cross-national service quality research. Marketing Letters, 17, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dhar, R. (1997). Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research., 24, 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994). Consumer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dolich, I. J. (1969). Congruence relationships between self-images and product brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 6, 80–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erikson, G. S., & Kushner, R. J. (1999). Public event networks: An application of marketing theory to sporting events. European Journal of Marketing, 33(3), 348–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fazio, R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 39–50.Google Scholar
  30. Fournier, S., & Yao, J. L. (1997). Reviving brand loyalty: A reconceptualization within the framework of consumer-brand relationships. International Journal of research in Marketing, 14, 451–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frankwick, G. L., Ward, J. C., Hutt, M. D., & Reingen, P. H. (1994). Evolving patterns of organizational beliefs in the formation of strategy. Journal of Marketing, 58, 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ganesan, S., & Hess, R. (1997). Dimensions and levels of trust: Implications for commitment to a relationship. Marketing Letters, 8(4), 439–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gwinner, K. P., & Eaton, J. (1999). Building brand image through event sponsorship: The role of image transfer. Journal of Advertising, 28, 47–57.Google Scholar
  34. He, H., & Li, Y. (2011). CSR and service Brand: The mediating effect on brand identification and moderating effect of service quality. Journal of Business Ethics., 100(4), 673–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 404–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Houston, D. A., & Fazio, R. H. (1989). Biased processing as a function of attitude accessibility: Making objective statements subjectively. Social Cognition, 7, 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hugues, G. D., & Guerrero, J. L. (1971). Automobile self-congruity models re-examined. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 125–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hurley, R. F. (2006). The decision to trust. Harvard Business Review., 84, 55–62.Google Scholar
  40. Inman, J. J. (1995). I saw the sign: Current trends in marketing signal research. In F. R. Kardes & M. Sujan (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 343–344). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  41. International Events Group. (2010). Sponsorship spending: 2010 Proves Better Than Expected; Bigger Gains Set For 2011. Retrieved February 8, 2011, from http://www.sponsorship.com/IEGSR/2011/01/04/Sponsorship-Spending-2010-Proves-Better-Than-Expe.aspx.
  42. Javalgi, R. G., Traylor, M. B., Gross, A. C., & Lampman, E. (1994). Awareness of sponsorship and corporate image: An empirical investigation. Journal of Advertising, 23, 47–58.Google Scholar
  43. Johar, G. V., & Pham, M. T. (1999). Relatedness, prominence and constructive sponsor identification. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johar, G. V., & Sirgy, M. J. (1991). Value expressive versus utilitarian appeals: When and why to use which appeal. Journal of Advertising, 20, 23–34.Google Scholar
  45. Johar, G. V., Pham, M. T., & Wakefield, K. L. (2006). How event sponsors are really identified: a (baseball) field analysis. Journal of Advertising Research., 46, 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Johnson, J. D., Herrmann, A., & Huber, F. (2006). The evolution of loyalty intentions. Journal of Marketing, 70, 122–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kamins, M. A. (1990). An investigation into the “match-up” hypothesis in celebrity advertising: when beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4–13.Google Scholar
  48. Keller, K. L. (2003). Brand synthesis: The multidimensionality of brand knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 595–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kim, J., Morris, J. D., & Swait, J. (2008). Antecedents of True Brand Loyalty. Journal of Advertising, 37, 99–117.Google Scholar
  50. Kirmani, A., & Rao, A. R. (2000). No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signalling unobservable product quality. Journal of Marketing, 64, 66–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kirmani, A., & Wright, P. (1989). Money talks: Perceived advertising expense and expected product quality. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 344–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Knapp, H., & Kirk, S. A. (2003). Using pencil and paper, internet and touch-tone phones for self-admistered surveys: Does methodology matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 19(1), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lardinoit, T., & Derbaix, C. (2001). Sponsorship and recall of sponsors. Psychology & Marketing, 18, 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Madrigal, R. (2000). The influence of social alliances with sports teams on intentions to purchase corporate sponsor’s products. Journal of Advertising, 29, 13–24.Google Scholar
  55. Malhotra, N. K. (1981). A scale to measure self-concepts, person concepts, and product concepts. Journal of Marketing, 18, 456–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Malhotra, N. K. (1988). Self-concept and product choice: An integrated perspective. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marshall DW, Cook G (1992) Does sponsorship always talk the same language? An overview of how attitudes to sponsorship vary across Europe. In Expoconsult (ed.), Sponsorship Europe’92 Conference Proceedings (pp. 151–171). Maarssen: ESOMARGoogle Scholar
  58. Masterson, R. (2005). The importance of creative match in television sponsorship. International Journal of Advertising, 24(4), 505–526.Google Scholar
  59. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, D. F. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.Google Scholar
  60. McKenzie, C. R. M. (2006). Increased sensitivity to differentially diagnostic answers using familiar materials: implications for confirmation bias. Memory & Cognition, 34(3), 577–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Meenaghan, J. A. (1983). Commercial sponsorship. European Journal of Marketing, 17(7), 5–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Meenaghan, T. (2001). Understanding sponsorship effects. Psychology & Marketing, 18, 95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Meyers-Levy, J., & Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research., 16(1), 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Olson, E. L. (2010). Does sponsorship work in the same way in different sponsorship contexts? European Journal of Marketing, 44(1/2), 180–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Olson, E. L., & Thjomoe, H. M. (2009). Sponsorship effect metric: Assessing the financial value of sponsoring by comparisons to television advertising. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 504–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Piercy, N. F., Cravens, D. W., Lane, N., & Vorhies, D. W. (2006). Driving organizational citizenship behaviors and salesperson in-role behavior performance: The role of management control and perceived organizational support. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 244–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Quester, P. G., & Thompson, B. (2001). Advertising and promotion leverage on arts sponsorship effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(1), 33–47.Google Scholar
  70. Raghunatham, R., Walker, R. E., & Hoyer, W. D. (2006). The unhealthy = tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 170–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rifon, N. J., Chol, S. M., Trimble, C. S., & Li, H. (2004). Congruence effects in sponsorship. Journal of Advertising, 33, 39–42.Google Scholar
  72. Roy, D. P., & Cornwell, B. T. (2003). Brand equity influence on responses to event sponsorships. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 12(3), 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ruth, J. A., & Simonin, B. L. (2003). Brought to you by brand A and brand B: Investigating multiple sponsors’ influence on consumers’ attitudes toward sponsored events. Journal of Advertising, 32, 19–30.Google Scholar
  74. Schlosser, A. E., White, T. B., & Lloyd, S. M. (2006). Converting web site visitors into buyers: How web site investment increases consumer trusting beliefs and online purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Simmons, C. J., & Becker-Olsen, K. L. (2006). Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing, 70, 154–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Simonin, B., & Ruth, J. A. (1998). Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sirgy, M. J. (1985). Self-image/product-image congruity and consumer decision making. International Journal of Management, 2, 49–63.Google Scholar
  78. Sirgy, M. J., Johar, J. S., Coskun Samli, A., & Claiborne, C. B. (1991). Self-congruity versus functional congruity: Predictors of consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19, 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sirgy, M. J., Grewal, D., Mangleburg, T. F., Park, J.-O., Chon, K.-S., Claiborne, C. B., et al. (1997). Assessing the predictive validity of two methods of measuring self-image congruence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sirgy, M. J., Lee, D.-J., Johar, J. S., & Tidwell, J. (2008). Effect of self-congruity with sponsorship on brand loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 61, 1091–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Speed, R., & Thompson, P. (2000). Determinants of sports sponsorship response. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 226–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Spence, M. (1973). Job marketing signalling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stipp, H. (1998). The impact of Olympic sponsorship on corporate image. International Journal of Advertising, 17(1), 75–87.Google Scholar
  84. Sweldens, S., Van Osselaer, S. M. J., & Janiszewski, C. (2010). Evaluative conditioning procedures and the resilience of conditioned brand attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Thompson, B. (2000). Ten commandments of structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 261–283). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  86. Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Park, C. W. (2005). The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Till, B. D., Stanley, S. M., & Priluck, R. (2008). Classical conditioning and celebrity endorsers: an examination of belongingness and resistance to extinction. Psychology & Marketing, 25, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Trendel, O., & Warlop, L. (2005). Positive implicit effects for event incongruent sponsorship. Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1), 240–241.Google Scholar
  89. Vanhonacker, W. (2007). Brand extension naming strategies: An exploratory study of the impact of brand traits. Marketing Letters., 18(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISG Business SchoolParisFrance
  2. 2.University Paul Cézanne in Aix en Provence (IAE Aix, Cergam) and Euromed Management in MarseillePuyricardFrance

Personalised recommendations