Advertisement

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 158–174 | Cite as

Green marketing strategies: an examination of stakeholders and the opportunities they present

  • J. Joseph CroninJr
  • Jeffery S. Smith
  • Mark R. Gleim
  • Edward Ramirez
  • Jennifer Dawn Martinez
Article

Abstract

As green marketing strategies become increasingly more important to firms adhering to a triple-bottom line performance evaluation, the present research seeks to better understand the role of “green” as a marketing strategy. Through an integration of the marketing, management, and operations literatures, an investigative framework is generated that identifies the various stakeholders potentially impacted through the environmentally friendly efforts of a firm. Specifically, the inter-connected nature of the core business disciplines of marketing, management (both strategy and human resources), and operations are examined as controllable functions within an organization from which strategies can be enacted to affect a firm’s stakeholders. The prior research in these areas is examined to identify potential research opportunities in marketing while also offering a series of representative research questions that can help guide future research in marketing.

Keywords

Green marketing strategy Environmental strategy Stakeholder analysis 

References

  1. Alexander, G. J., & Buchholz, R. A. (1978). Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal, 21(3), 479–486.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, W. T., & Cunningham, H. (1972). The socially conscious consumer. Journal of Marketing, 36, 23–32.Google Scholar
  3. Angell, L. C. (2001). Comparing the environmental and quality initiatives of Badrige Award winners. Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 276–292.Google Scholar
  4. Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 71–88.Google Scholar
  5. Aragón-Correa, J. A., Matıas-Reche, F., & Senise-Barrio, M. E. (2004). Managerial discretion and corporate commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Research, 57, 964–975.Google Scholar
  6. Ashford, N. A., & Heaton, G. R. (1983). Environmental, health, safety, regulation and technological innovation. In C. T. Hill & J. M. Utterback (Eds.), Technological innovation for a dynamic economy. Oxford: Peragon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 446–463.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2005). Environmental marketing strategy and firm performance: effects on new product performance and market share. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 461–475.Google Scholar
  9. Banerjee, S. B. (2002). Corporate environmentalism: the construct and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 55, 177–191.Google Scholar
  10. Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.Google Scholar
  11. Bansal, P., & Hunter, T. (2003). Strategic explanations for ISO 14001 adoption. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(3), 289–299.Google Scholar
  12. Barratt, M. (2004). Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management, 9(1), 30–42.Google Scholar
  13. Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Drumwright, M. E. (2006). Identity, identificaion, and relationship through social alliances. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 128–137.Google Scholar
  14. Blackburn, J. D., Guide, V. D., Souza, G. C., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2004). Reverse supply chains for commercial returns. California Management Review, 46(2), 6–22.Google Scholar
  15. Bohlen, G. M., Diamantopolous, A., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (1993). Consumer perceptions of the environmental impact of an industrial service. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 11(1), 37–48.Google Scholar
  16. Bowen, F. E., Cousins, P. D., Lamming, R. C., & Farukt, A. C. (2001). The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 174–189.Google Scholar
  17. Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., & Stank, T. P. (2000). Ten mega-trends that will revolutionize supply chain logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product reponses. Journal of Marketing, 61, 68–84.Google Scholar
  19. Brown, B., & Perry, S. (1994). Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune’s “most admired” companies. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1347–1359.Google Scholar
  20. Brummer, J. J. (1991). Corporate social responsibility and legitimacy: An interdisciplinary analysis. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  21. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.Google Scholar
  22. Carlson, L., Grove, S. J., & Kangun, N. (1993). A content analysis of environmental advertising claims: a matrix method approach. Journal of Advertising, 22, 27–39.Google Scholar
  23. Carter, C. R., & Carter, J. R. (1998). Interorganizational determinants of environmental purchasing: initial evidence from the consumer products industries. Decision Sciences, 29(3), 659–684.Google Scholar
  24. Carter, C. R., & Dresner, M. (2001). Purchasing’s role in environmental management: cross-functional development of grounded theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(3), 12–27.Google Scholar
  25. Carter, C. R., & Jennings, M. M. (2004). The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: a structural equation analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), 145–186.Google Scholar
  26. Carter, C. R., Ellram, L. M., & Tate, W. (2007). The use of social network analysis in logistics research. Journal of Business Logistics, 28(1), 137–168.Google Scholar
  27. Center for Sustainable Enterprise (2010). About the center for sustainable enterprise. Retrieved June 15, 2010 from www.kenan-flagler.unc.edu.
  28. Chinander, K. R. (2001). Aligning accountability and awareness for environmental performance in operations. Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 276–291.Google Scholar
  29. Coddington, W. (1993). Environmental marketing: Positive strategies for reaching the green consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  30. Davis, J. J. (1993). Strategies for environmental advertising. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10, 19–36.Google Scholar
  31. De Ruyter, K., De Jong, A., & Wetzels, M. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of environmental stewardship in boundary-spanning B2B teams. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(4), 470–487.Google Scholar
  32. Debo, L. G., Toktay, L. B., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2001). Market segmentation and product technology for remanufacturable products. Management Science, 51(8), 1193–1205.Google Scholar
  33. Delmas, M. (2001). Stakeholders and competitive advantage: the case of ISO 14001. Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 343–358.Google Scholar
  34. Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56, 465–480.Google Scholar
  35. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  36. Drumwright, M. E. (1994). Socially responsible organizational buying: environmental concern as a noneconomic buying criterion. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 1–19.Google Scholar
  37. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157.Google Scholar
  39. Fein, S. (1996). Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1164–1184.Google Scholar
  40. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  41. Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), 185–200.Google Scholar
  42. Gattiker, T. F., & Carter, C. R. (2010). Understanding project champions’ ability to gain intra-organizational commitment for environmental projects. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 72–85.Google Scholar
  43. Ginsberg, J. M., & Bloom, P. N. (2004). Choosing the right green marketing strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 79–84, Fall.Google Scholar
  44. Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472–482.Google Scholar
  45. Grinstein, A., & Nisan, U. (2009). Demarketing, minorities, and national attachment. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 105–122.Google Scholar
  46. Guide, V. D. R., Jr. (2000). Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs. Journal of Operations Management, 18(4), 467–483.Google Scholar
  47. Guide, V. D. R., Jr., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2001). Managing product returns for remanufacturing. Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 142–155.Google Scholar
  48. Guide, V. D. R., Jr., Teunter, R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2003). Matching supply and demand to maximize profits from remanufacturing. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 5(4), 303–316.Google Scholar
  49. Guitierrez, C. (2010). Gulf oil crisis: BP credit rating cut by Moody’s. Retrieved June 23, 2010 from www.forbes.com.
  50. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293–317.Google Scholar
  51. Hall, J., & Vredenburg, H. (2005). Managing stakeholder ambiguity. Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 11–13.Google Scholar
  52. Handfield, R., Walton, S. V., Seegers, L. K., & Melnyk, S. A. (1997). Green value chain practices in the furniture industry. Journal of Operations Management, 15(4), 293–315.Google Scholar
  53. Handfield, R., Walton, S. V., Sroufe, R., & Melnyk, S. A. (2002). Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: a study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process. European Journal of Operations Research, 141(1), 70–87.Google Scholar
  54. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural resource based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.Google Scholar
  55. Hart, S. L., Arnold, M., & Day, R. (2000). The business of sustainable forestry: meshing operations with strategic purpose. Interfaces, 30(3), 234–250.Google Scholar
  56. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139.Google Scholar
  57. Hunt, C. B., & Auster, E. R. (1990). Proactive environmental management: avoiding the toxic trap. MIT Sloan Management Review, 31(2), 7–18.Google Scholar
  58. Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62, 42–54.Google Scholar
  59. Isbell, T. S. (1991). The backside of TQM: how waste indicates haste. Industrial Engineering, 23(11), 42–45.Google Scholar
  60. Jacobs, B. W., Singhal, V. R., & Subramanian, R. (2010). An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 430–441.Google Scholar
  61. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70.Google Scholar
  62. Kangum, N., Carlson, L., & Grove, S. J. (1991). Environmental advertising claims: a preliminary investigation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 47–58.Google Scholar
  63. Kassinis, G., & Soteriou, A. C. (2003). Greening the service profit chain: the impact of environmental management practices. Production and Operations Management, 12(3), 386–403.Google Scholar
  64. Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 145–159.Google Scholar
  65. King, A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Lean and green: exploring the spillovers from lean production to environmental performance. Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 244–256.Google Scholar
  66. King, A., & Lenox, M. J. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science, 48(2), 289–299.Google Scholar
  67. Kinnear, T., Taylor, J. R., & Ahmed, S. (1974). Ecological concerned consumers: who are they? Journal of Marketing, 38, 2–24.Google Scholar
  68. Klassen, R. D. (2001). Plant-level environmental management orientation: the influence of management views and plant characteristics. Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 257–275.Google Scholar
  69. Klassen, R. D., & Angell, L. C. (1998). An international comparison of environmental management in operations: the impact of manufacturing flexibility in the U.S. and Germany. Journal of Operations Management, 15(23), 177–194.Google Scholar
  70. Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999). The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 599–615.Google Scholar
  71. Kleindorfer, P. R., Singhal, K., & Wassenhove, L. N. V. (2005). Sustainable operations management. Production and Operations Management, 14(4), 482–492.Google Scholar
  72. Kumar, S., & Malegeant, P. (2006). Strategic alliance in a closed-loop supply chain, a case of manufacturer and eco-non-profit organization. Technovation, 26(10), 1127–1135.Google Scholar
  73. Lapre, M. A., Mukherjee, A. S., & van Wassenhove, L. N. (2000). Behind the learning curve: linking learning activities to waste reduction. Management Science, 46(5), 597–611.Google Scholar
  74. Lash, J., & Wellington, F. (2007). Competitive advantage on a warming planet. Harvard Business Review, 85(3), 94–102.Google Scholar
  75. Lawrence, A. T., & Morell, D. (1995). Leading-edge environmental management: Motivation, opportunity, resources, and processes. In J. E. Post (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy, supplement 1 (pp. 99–126). Greenwich: JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar
  76. Lee, S. Y., & Klassen, R. D. (2008). Drivers and enablers that foster environmental management capabilities in small and medium sized suppliers and supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 17(6), 573–586.Google Scholar
  77. Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effects of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68, 16–32.Google Scholar
  78. Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability: potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing,74(5), 18–31.Google Scholar
  79. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70, 1–18.Google Scholar
  80. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2001). Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument: concepts, evidence, and research directions. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 457–484.Google Scholar
  81. Majumdar, S., & Marcus, M. A. (2001). Rules vs. discretion: the productivity consequences of flexible regulation. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 170–179.Google Scholar
  82. Makower, J. (2009). Taking care of business. Retrieved August 25, 2009 from www.greenbiz.com.
  83. Markley, M. J., & Davis, L. (2007). Exploring future competitive advantage through sustainable supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 37(9), 763–774.Google Scholar
  84. Marshall, R. S., & Brown, D. (2003). The strategy of sustainability: a systems perspective on environmental initiatives. California Management Review, 46(1), 101–126.Google Scholar
  85. Mathur, L. K., & Mathur, I. (2000). An analysis of the wealth effects of green marketing strategies. Journal of Business Research, 50(2), 193–200.Google Scholar
  86. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Design for the triple top line: new tools for sustainable commerce. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 9(3), 251–258.Google Scholar
  87. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.Google Scholar
  88. Melnyk, S. A., Sroufe, R. P., & Calantone, R. (2003). Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(3), 329–351.Google Scholar
  89. Menguc, B., & Ozanne, L. K. (2005). Challenges of the “green imperative”: a natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation—business performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 430–438.Google Scholar
  90. Menon, A., & Menon, A. (1997). Enviroprenerial marketing strategy: the emergence of corporate environmentalism as market strategy. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 51–67.Google Scholar
  91. Mirvis, P. H. (1994). Environmentalism in progressive businesses. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 7(4), 82–100.Google Scholar
  92. Mohr, L. A., Eroglu, D., & Ellen, P. S. (1998). The development and testing of a measure of skepticism toward environmental claims in marketers’ communications. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32(1), 30–55.Google Scholar
  93. Montabon, F., Sroufe, R., & Narasimhan, R. (2007). An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25(5), 998–1014.Google Scholar
  94. Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 71–75.Google Scholar
  95. Mostafa, M. M. (2007). Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ green purchase behaviour: the effects of environmental knowledge, concern, and attitude. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(3), 220–229.Google Scholar
  96. Murphy, P. R., & Poist, R. F. (2002). Socially responsible logistics: an exploratory study. Transportation Journal, 41(4), 23–35.Google Scholar
  97. Narver, J. C. (1971). Rational management responses to external effects. Academy of Management Journal, 14(1), 99–115.Google Scholar
  98. Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 243–262.Google Scholar
  99. Pagell, M., & Gobeli, D. (2009). How plant managers’ experiences and attitudes toward sustainability relate to operational performance. Production and Operations Management, 18(3), 278–299.Google Scholar
  100. Parket, I. R., & Eilbirt, H. (1975). Social responsibility: the underlying factors. Business Horizons, 18, 5–10.Google Scholar
  101. Perreault, W. D., Jr., & Leigh, L. E. (1989). Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 135–148.Google Scholar
  102. Pil, F. K., & Rothenberg, S. (2003). Environmental performance as a driver of superior quality. Production and Operations Management, 12(3), 404–415.Google Scholar
  103. Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 95–117.Google Scholar
  104. Porter, M., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.Google Scholar
  105. Pujari, D., Wright, G., & Peattie, K. (2003). Green and competitive: influences on environmental new product development performance. Journal of Business Research, 56(8), 657–674.Google Scholar
  106. Ramus, C. A., & Steger, U. (2000). The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee ‘ecoinitiatives’ at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 605–626.Google Scholar
  107. Razzaque, M. A., & Hwee, T. P. (2002). Ethics and purchasing dilemma: a Singaporean view. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(4), 307–326.Google Scholar
  108. Reinhardt, F. (1999). Market failure and the environmental policies of firms. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3(1), 9–21.Google Scholar
  109. Roberts, J. A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36, 217–231.Google Scholar
  110. Roberts, S. (2003). Supply chain specific? Understanding the patchy success of ethical source initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 159–170.Google Scholar
  111. Rothenberg, S., Pil, F. K., & Maxwell, J. (2001). Lean, green, and the quest for superior environmental performance. Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 228–243.Google Scholar
  112. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.Google Scholar
  113. Saad, L. (2006). Americans see environment as getting worse. Accessed March 11, 2010. http://www.gallup.com/. April 20, 2006.
  114. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does Dong good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225–243.Google Scholar
  115. Shrivastava, P. (1995a). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 183–200.Google Scholar
  116. Shrivastava, P. (1995b). Technological transformation and the new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 183–200.Google Scholar
  117. Shrum, L. J., McCarty, J. A., & Lowrey, T. M. (1995). Buyer characteristics of the green consumer and their implications for advertising strategy. Journal of Advertising, 14(2), 71–82.Google Scholar
  118. Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (2000). The positive effect of a market orientation on business profitability: a balanced replication. Journal of Business Research, 48, 69–73.Google Scholar
  119. Sroufe, R. (2003). Effects of environmental management systems on environmental management practices and operations. Production and Operations Management, 12(3), 416–431.Google Scholar
  120. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  121. Tanner, C., & Kast, S. W. (2003). Promoting sustainable consumption: determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 20(10), 883–902.Google Scholar
  122. Teoh, S. H., Welch, I., & Wazzan, C. P. (1999). The effect of socially activist investment policies on the financial markets: evidence from the South African boycott. Journal of Business, 72(1), 35–89.Google Scholar
  123. Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: a critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557.Google Scholar
  124. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2005). Talk the walk: Advancing sustainable lifestyles through marketing and communications. Retrieved June 1, 2010 from www.unep.fr.
  125. Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2006). Extending green practices across the supply chain: the impact of upstream and downstream integration. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26(7), 795–821.Google Scholar
  126. van Woensel, T., Creten, R., & Vandaele, N. (2001). Managing the environmental externalities of traffic logistics: the issue of emissions. Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 207–223.Google Scholar
  127. Vance, S. C. (1975). Are socially responsible corporations good investment risks? Management Review, 64, 18–24.Google Scholar
  128. Varadarajan, P. R. (1992). Marketing’s contribution to strategy: the view from a different looking glass. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20, 323–343.Google Scholar
  129. Vastag, G. (2004). Revisiting ISO 14000 diffusion: a new “look” at the drivers of certification. Production and Operations Management, 13(3), 260–267.Google Scholar
  130. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.Google Scholar
  131. Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73, 77–91.Google Scholar
  132. Webster, F., Jr. (1975). Determining the characteristics of the socially conscious consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 188–196.Google Scholar
  133. Willard, R. (2008). In M. V. Russo (Ed.), Objection-handling clinic on inhibitors the next wave. Environmental management: Readings and cases (pp. 169–190). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  134. Winston, A. (2009). Finding the capital to go green. Retrieved November 12, 2009 from www.businessweek.com.
  135. Wright, P., & Ferris, S. P. (1997). Agency conflict and corporate strategy: the effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 77–83.Google Scholar
  136. Yoon, Y., Gurhan-Canli, Z., & Bozok, B. (2006). Drawing inferences about others on the basis of corporate associations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 167–173.Google Scholar
  137. Zinkhan, G. M., & Carlson, L. (1995). Green advertising and the reluctant consumer. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 1–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Joseph CroninJr
    • 1
  • Jeffery S. Smith
    • 1
  • Mark R. Gleim
    • 1
  • Edward Ramirez
    • 2
  • Jennifer Dawn Martinez
    • 3
  1. 1.The College of Business, Department of MarketingThe Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.College of Business Administration, Department of Marketing and ManagementThe University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA
  3. 3.Fogelman College of Business & Economics, Department of Marketing & Supply Chain ManagementThe University of MemphisMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations