Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 376–391 | Cite as

Productive play time: the effect of practice on consumer demand for hedonic experiences

  • Kyle B. MurrayEmail author
  • Steven Bellman
Original Empirical Research


In this paper we explain how practice, prior knowledge and task difficulty interact to affect demand for hedonic experiences. As predicted by the human capital model, we propose that the key determinant of demand for hedonic experiences is the increase in performance efficiency that can be gained through practice. In addition, we argue that the nature of the effect of practice is distinctly different in hedonic consumption, compared to utilitarian consumption. Specifically, for hedonic experiences, practice allows consumers to extract greater value within a given period of time, rather than reduce the amount of time spent on a (utilitarian) task. Finally, we argue that if changes in performance efficiency across repeated hedonic experiences adhere to the power law of practice, then both prior knowledge and task difficulty will be important moderators of the main effect of practice on demand. These predictions are tested in two experiments that use an online panel to examine consumer demand for videogames.


Experience Power law of practice Human capital model Videogames Internet Hedonic products Utilitarian Prior knowledge Decision making 


  1. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ariely, D., & Zauberman, G. (2000). On the making of an experience: the effects of breaking and combining experiences on their overall evaluation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(2), 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Experimentation in social psychology. In T. Daniel, D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S. (1996). Accounting for tastes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cantor, N., & Sanderson, C. A. (1999). Life task participation and well-being: The importance of taking part in daily life. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Cotte, J., & Latour, K. (1999). Blackjack in the kitchen: understanding online versus casino gambling. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 742–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ford, D., Berthon, P., Brown, S., Gadde, L.-E., Håkansson, H., Naudé, P., et al. (2002). The business marketing course: Managing in complex networks. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoch, S. J., & Deighton, J. (1989). Managing what consumers learn from experience. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holbrook, M. B., Chestnut, R. W., Oliva, T. A., & Greenleaf, E. A. (1984). Play as consumption experience: the roles of emotions, performance, and personality in the enjoyment of games. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2), 728–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, E. J., Bellman, S., & Lohse, G. L. (2003). Cognitive lock-in and the power law of practice. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  18. Kahneman, D. (2000). Evaluation by moments: Past and future. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choice, values and frames. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analysis of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mittal, V., & Sawhney, M. S. (2001). Learning and using electronic information products and services: a field study. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(1), 2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murray, K. B., & Häubl, G. (2002). The fiction of no friction: A user skills approach to cognitive lock-in. In S. M. Broniarczyk & K. Nakamoto (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 29). Valdosta: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  22. Murray, K. B., & Häubl, G. (2003). A human capital perspective of skill acquisition and interface loyalty. Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 272–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murray, K. B., & Häubl, G. (2007). Explaining cognitive lock-in: the role of skill-based habits of use in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(1), 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  26. Putrevu, S., & Ratchford, B. T. (1997). A model of search behavior with an application to grocery shopping. Journal of Retailing, 73(4), 464–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ratchford, B. T. (2001). The economics of consumer knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schilling, M. A., Vidal, P., Ployhart, R. E., & Marangoni, A. (2003). Learning by Doing Something Else: variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management Science, 49(1), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stevens, J. C., & Savin, H. B. (1962). On the form of learning curves. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5(1), 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stigler, G. J., & Becker, G. S. (1977). De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. American Economic Review, 67(2), 76–90.Google Scholar
  31. van Reekum, C. M., Johnstone, T., Banse, R., Etter, A., Wehrle, T., & Scherer, K. R. (2004). Psychophysiological responses to appraisal dimensions in a computer game. Cognition and Emotion, 18(5), 663–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wernerfelt, B. (1985). Brand loyalty and user skills. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 6(4), 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zauberman, G. (2003). The intertemporal dynamics of consumer lock‐in. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 405–419.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Retailing, Alberta School of Business, 2-32K BusinessUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Interactive Television Research InstituteMurdoch UniversityMurdochAustralia

Personalised recommendations