Advertisement

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 86–100 | Cite as

Toward a “theoretical toolbox” for sustainability research in marketing

  • Brian L. Connelly
  • David J. KetchenJr.
  • Stanley F. Slater
Article

Abstract

This paper provides a foundation for future marketing research on sustainability through the application of nine prominent organizational theories. Specifically, we consider the implications for sustainability offered by transaction cost economics, agency theory, institutional theory, population ecology, resource dependence theory, the resource-based view of the firm, upper echelons theory, social network theory, and signaling theory. We consider how each theory can help researchers to better understand the ways that firms engage in sustainable marketing and business practices, and we develop insights that emerge from simultaneous examination of complementary or competing theoretical perspectives.

Keywords

Sustainability Organization theory 

References

  1. Agarwal, M. K., & Berens, G. (2009). How corporate social performance influences financial performance: Cash flow and cost of capital. Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Series, 09-001.Google Scholar
  2. Aggarwal, R., Klapper, L., & Wysocki, P. D. (2005). Portfolio preferences of foreign institutional investors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29, 2919–2946.Google Scholar
  3. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.Google Scholar
  4. Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45–62.Google Scholar
  5. Amburgey, T. L., & Rao, H. (1996). Organizational ecology: past, present, and future directions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1265–1286.Google Scholar
  6. American Marketing Association. (2010). Dictionary. http://www.marketingpower.com/_layouts/Dictionary.aspx?dLetter=G. Accessed 3 January 2010.
  7. Anderson, E. (2008). The salesperson as outside agent or employee: a transaction cost analysis. Marketing Science, 27(1), 70–84.Google Scholar
  8. Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance & sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433–448.Google Scholar
  9. Arthurs, J. D., Hoskisson, R. E., Busenitz, L. W., & Johnson, R. A. (2008). Managerial agents watching other agents: multiple agency conflicts regarding underpricing in IPO firms. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 277–294.Google Scholar
  10. Atuahene-Gima, K., & Murray, J. (2004). Antecedents and outcomes of marketing strategy comprehensiveness. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 33–46.Google Scholar
  11. Banerjee, S. B., Iyer, E. S., & Kashyap, R. K. (2003). Corporate environmentalism: antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 106–122.Google Scholar
  12. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.Google Scholar
  13. Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641.Google Scholar
  14. Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Drumwright, M. E. (2007). Mainstreaming corporate social responsibility: developing markets for virtue. California Management Review, 49(4), 132–157.Google Scholar
  15. Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013.Google Scholar
  16. Bruton, G. D., Chahine, S., & Filatotchev, I. (2009). Founders, private equity investors, and underpricing in entrepreneurial IPOs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 909–928.Google Scholar
  17. Burt, R. S. (1992). The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Bushee, B. J. (2001). Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value? Contemporary Accounting Research, 18, 207–246.Google Scholar
  20. Bushee, B. J. (2009). Identifying and attracting the “right” investors. In D. H. Chew & S. L. Gillan (Eds.), U. S. Corporate Governance (pp. 170–183). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30, 749–778.Google Scholar
  22. Carraher, S. M., Buckley, M. R., & Carraher, C. E. (2008). Research challenges in sustainable strategic management: Change and sustainability. 1(1), 2–15.Google Scholar
  23. Center for Sustainable Enterprise. (2010). http://www.kenan-flagler.unc.edu/cse/cse-overview.cfm. Accessed 20 February 2010.
  24. Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 197–218.Google Scholar
  25. Christensen, C. M., & Anthony, S. D. (2007). Put investors in their place. Business Week, 28, 108–109.Google Scholar
  26. Connelly, B. L., Johnson, J., Tihanyi, L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (2010a). More than adopters: Competing influences in the interlocking directorate. Organization Science, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  27. Connelly, B. L., Tihanyi, L., Certo, S. T., & Hitt, M. A. (2010b). Marching to the beat of different drummers: The influence of institutional owners on competitive actions. Academy of Management Journal, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  28. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Dalton, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2005). In defense of the individual: the CEO as board chairperson. Journal of Business Strategy, 26(6), 8–9.Google Scholar
  30. Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. (2007). The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation: independence, equity, and the market for corporate control. Academy of Management Annual Reviews, 1(1), 1–64.Google Scholar
  31. David, P., Bloom, M., & Hillman, A. (2007). Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 91–100.Google Scholar
  32. Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. (2009). Resource dependence theory: Past and future. In S. B. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  33. Day, G. S. (1990). Market-driven strategy. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  34. Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37–52.Google Scholar
  35. de Azevado, J. S. G. (2009). The greening of Petrobas. Harvard Business Review, 87, 43–47.Google Scholar
  36. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.Google Scholar
  37. Drucker, P. F. (1955). The practice of management. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  38. Drucker, P. F. (1974). Management: tasks, responsibilities, practices. London: Heinemann. first published 1973.Google Scholar
  39. Drucker, P. F. (1994). The theory of the business. Harvard Business Review, 72(5), 95–104.Google Scholar
  40. Dwyer, R., & Oh, S. (1987). Output sector munificence effects on the internal political economy of marketing channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(4), 347–358.Google Scholar
  41. Engardio, P., Capell, K., Carey, J., & Hall, K. (2007). Beyond the green corporation. Business Week, 29, 25–29.Google Scholar
  42. Etzion, D. (2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-Present: a review. Journal of Management, 33(4), 637–664.Google Scholar
  43. Floyd, D. W., Vonhof, S. L., & Seyfang, H. E. (2001). Forest sustainability: a discussion guide for professional resource managers. Journal of Forestry, 99(2), 8–15.Google Scholar
  44. Forlani, D., Parthasarathy, M., & Keaveney, S. M. (2008). Managerial risk perceptions of international entry mode strategies. International Marketing Review, 25(3), 292–311.Google Scholar
  45. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13, 33.Google Scholar
  46. Ghosh, M., & John, G. (2009). When should original equipment manufacturers use branded component contracts with suppliers? Journal of Marketing Research, 46(5), 597–611.Google Scholar
  47. Ginsberg, J., & Bloom, P. (2004). Choosing the right green marketing strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 79–84.Google Scholar
  48. Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: a structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 431–445.Google Scholar
  49. Goldstein, J. (2004). People and products in the fast-growing sustainable scene. In Business, September/October, 1.Google Scholar
  50. Gompers, P. A., & Metrick, A. (2001). Institutional investors and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 229–260.Google Scholar
  51. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.Google Scholar
  52. Green, H. (2008). The Greening of the Corporation. Business Week Online, http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2008/tc20081211_004876.htm. Accessed 3 March 2010.
  53. Gupta, A. K., Govindarajan, V., & Malhotra, A. (1999). Feedback-seeking behavior within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 205–222.Google Scholar
  54. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.Google Scholar
  55. Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659–684.Google Scholar
  56. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.Google Scholar
  57. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479–485.Google Scholar
  59. Heide, J. B., Wathne, K. H., & Rokkan, A. I. (2007). Interfirm monitoring, social contracts, and relationship outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 425–433.Google Scholar
  60. Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: a review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.Google Scholar
  61. Hofer, C. W., & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy Formulation: Analytical concepts. St Paul: West.Google Scholar
  62. Holliday, C. (2001). Sustainable growth, the DuPont way. Harvard Business Review, 79, 129–134.Google Scholar
  63. Homburg, C., Workman, J., Jr., & Krohmer, H. (1999). Marketing’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 1–17.Google Scholar
  64. Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting voices: the effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 697–716.Google Scholar
  65. Humphreys, A. (2010). Megamarketing: the creation of markets as a social process. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 1–19.Google Scholar
  66. Janney, J. J., & Folta, T. B. (2006). Moderating effects of investor experience on the signaling value of private equity placements. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(1), 27–44.Google Scholar
  67. Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015–1052.Google Scholar
  68. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.Google Scholar
  69. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.Google Scholar
  70. Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945.Google Scholar
  71. Jones, P., Clarke-Hill, C., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2007). Marketing and sustainability. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 26(2), 123–130.Google Scholar
  72. Ketchen, D. J., & Hult, G. T. (2007). Bridging organization theory and supply chain management: the case of best value supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 573–580.Google Scholar
  73. Knight, D., Pearce, C. L., Smith, K. G., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., Smith, K. A., et al. (1999). Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 445–466.Google Scholar
  74. Lal, R., Outland, D., & Staelin, R. (1994). Salesforce compensation plans: an individual-level analysis. Marketing Letters, 5(2), 117–130.Google Scholar
  75. Lambkin, M., & Day, G. (1989). Evolutionary processes in competitive environments: beyond the product life cycle. Journal of Marketing, 53(3), 4–20.Google Scholar
  76. Lampel, J., & Shamsie, J. (2000). Critical push: strategies for creating momentum in the motion picture industry. Journal of Management, 26(2), 233–257.Google Scholar
  77. Landor Associates. (2007). New survey conducted indicates green is no longer a marginalized issue in the United States. http://www.landor.com/?do=news.pressrelease&r=&storyid=507. Accessed 4 January 2010.
  78. Landor Associates. (2009). Green brands, global insight: Findings from the 2009 ImagePower green brands survey. http://www.landor.com/index.cfm?do=thinking.article&storyid=749. Accessed 4 January 2010.
  79. Lodge, G. C. (2001). Our common future? Harvard Business Review, 68, 221–222.Google Scholar
  80. Lovins, A. B., Lovins, L. H., & Hawken, P. (2007). A road map for natural capitalism. Harvard Business Review, 85, 172–183.Google Scholar
  81. Lundberg, C. C. (2004). Is there really nothing so practical as a good theory? Business Horizons, 47(5), 7–14.Google Scholar
  82. Magee, D. (2009). Jeff Immelt and the new GE way: Innovation, transformation and winning in the 21st century. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  83. Magretta, J. (1997). Growth through global sustainability: an interview with Monsato’s CEO, Robert B. Shapiro. Harvard Business Review, 75, 79–88.Google Scholar
  84. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.Google Scholar
  85. Marshall, R. S., & Brown, D. (2003). The strategy of sustainability: a systems perspective on environmental initiatives, 45(1), 101–126.Google Scholar
  86. McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2006). Sustainability: consumer perceptions and marketing strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 157–170.Google Scholar
  87. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point.Google Scholar
  88. Menon, A., & Menon, A. (1997). Enviropreneurial marketing strategy: the emergence of corporate environmentalism as market strategy. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 51–67.Google Scholar
  89. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.Google Scholar
  90. Nath, P., & Mahajan, V. (2008). Chief marketing officers: a study of their presence in firms’ top management teams. Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 65–81.Google Scholar
  91. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87, 57–64.Google Scholar
  92. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.Google Scholar
  93. Orsato, R. J. (2006). Competitive environmental strategies: when does it pay to be green? California Management Review, 48(2), 127–143.Google Scholar
  94. Peattie, K. (2001). Towards sustainability: the third age of green marketing. The Marketing Review, 2, 129–146.Google Scholar
  95. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  96. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78.Google Scholar
  97. Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.Google Scholar
  98. Preston, L. (2001). Sustainability at Hewlett Packard: from theory to practice. California Management Review, 43(3), 26–37.Google Scholar
  99. Ramus, C. A. (2001). Organizational support for employees: encouraging creative ideas for environmental sustainability. California Management Review, 43(3), 85–105.Google Scholar
  100. Rechenthin, D. (2004). Project safety as a sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Safety Research, 35(3), 297–308.Google Scholar
  101. Reinhardt, F. L. (1998). Environmental product differentiation: implications for corporate strategy. California Management Review, 40(4), 43–73.Google Scholar
  102. Rindfleisch, A., & Heide, J. B. (1997). Transaction cost analysis: past, present, and future applications. Journal of Marketing, 61, 30–54.Google Scholar
  103. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (1998). Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 363–375.Google Scholar
  104. Savitz, A. W., & Weber, K. (2006). The triple bottom line. New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  105. Schueth, S. (2003). Socially responsible investing in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 189–194.Google Scholar
  106. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  107. Sheth, J., & Sisodia, R. (2002). The rule of three: Surviving and thriving in competitive markets. New York: The Free.Google Scholar
  108. Shook, C. L., Adams, G. L., Ketchen, D. J., & Craighead, C. W. (2009). Towards a “theoretical toolbox” for strategic sourcing. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
  109. Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936–960.Google Scholar
  110. Singh, J. V., & Lumsden, C. J. (1990). Theory and research in organizational ecology. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 161–195.Google Scholar
  111. Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292.Google Scholar
  112. Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1998). Customer-led and market-oriented: let’s not confuse the two. Strategic Management Journal, 19(10), 1001–1006.Google Scholar
  113. Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: whether or how? California Management Review, 45(4), 52–76.Google Scholar
  114. Smith, N. C. (2009). Bounded goodness: marketing implications of Drucker on corporate responsibility. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(1), 73–84.Google Scholar
  115. Sorescu, A., Shankar, V., & Kushwaha, T. (2007). New product preannouncements and shareholder value: don’t make promises you can’t keep. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 468–489.Google Scholar
  116. Spence, M. (1974). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.Google Scholar
  117. Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A., & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-based assets and shareholder value: a framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 2–18.Google Scholar
  118. Starik, M., & Rands, G. P. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 908–935.Google Scholar
  119. Stead, J. G., & Stead, W. E. (2008). Sustainable strategic management: an evolutionary perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management, 1(1), 62–81.Google Scholar
  120. Varadarajan, P. R. (1992). Marketing’s contribution to strategy: the view from a different looking glass. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(4), 335–343.Google Scholar
  121. Varchaver, N. (2007). Chemical reaction. Fortune, 155(6), 52–58.Google Scholar
  122. Verhoef, P. C., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2009). Understanding the marketing department’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 14–37.Google Scholar
  123. Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  124. Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. (2005). Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 80–94.Google Scholar
  125. Webster, F. E., Jr. (1994). Market-driven management. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  126. Webster, F. E., Jr. (2009). Marketing IS management: the wisdom of Peter Drucker. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(1), 20–27.Google Scholar
  127. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and anti-trust implications. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  128. Wind, J. Y. (2009). Rethinking marketing: Peter Drucker’s challenge. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(1), 28–34.Google Scholar
  129. Wuyts, S., Stremersh, S., Van den Bulte, C., & Franses, P. H. (2004). Vertical marketing systems for complex products: a triadic perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(4), 479–487.Google Scholar
  130. Wycherley, I. (1999). Greening supply chains: the case of the Body Shop International. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8(2), 120–127.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian L. Connelly
    • 1
  • David J. KetchenJr.
    • 1
  • Stanley F. Slater
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Business, Department of ManagementAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  2. 2.College of Business, Department of MarketingColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations