Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 604–616 | Cite as

Service firms and customer loyalty programs: a regulatory fit perspective of reward preferences in a health club setting

  • Ahmad DaryantoEmail author
  • Ko de Ruyter
  • Martin Wetzels
  • Paul G. Patterson
Original Empirical Research


In this paper, we examine the impact of various configurations of regulatory fit on the attitudes, exercise intentions and actual behavior of members of a health club loyalty program. Regulatory fit is conceptualized as both the match between types of program rewards and how they are communicated, as well as the congruence between reward types and regulatory focus as a stable, individual disposition. In two experimental designs, non-point reward programs offering a short-term cash bonus were used. The results of Study 1 suggest that regulatory fit has a positive impact on perceived value, exercise intentions and exercise intensity, but not on visit frequency. Analysis of repeated behavioral measures further reveals that regulatory fit has a stronger impact on exercise intensity over time relative to nonfit. Study 2 also confirms the predictive power of regulatory fit over nonfit when conceptualized as the match between reward type and trait regulatory focus.


Regulatory fit Value perception Customer loyalty programs 


  1. Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2001). ‘I’ seek pleasures and ‘we’ avoid pains: the role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aaker, J., & Lee, A. Y. (2006). Understanding regulatory fit. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arora, R., Charles, S., & Alisha, A. (2006). Using framing and credibility to incorporate exercise and fitness in individuals’ lifestyle. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4/5), 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banks, S. M., Salovey, P., & Greener, S. (1995). The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology, 14(2), 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bargh, J. A., Bond, R. N., Lombardi, W. J., & Tota, M. E. (1986). The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 869–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandstatter, V., Heimbeck, D., Malzacher, J. T., & Frese, M. (2003). Goals need implementation intentions: the model of action phases tested in the applied setting of continuing education. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brendl, M., & Higgins, E. T. (1995). Sensitivity to varying gains and losses: the role of self-discrepencies and event framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1028–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from ‘feeling right’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(3), 388–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cesario, J., Higgins, E. T., & Scholer, A. A. (2008). Regulatory fit and persuasion: basic principles and remaining questions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 444–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000). A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chandon, P., Morwitz, V. G., & Werner, R. J. (2005). Do intentions really predict behavior? Self-generated validity effects in survey research. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Colloquy (2009). Loyalty program membership grows, but activity remains flat. Retrieved June 30, 2009
  14. Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feinberg, F. M., Krishna, A., & Zhang, Z. J. (2002). Do we care what others get? A behaviorist approach to targeted promotions. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuhrer, R., Shipley, M. J., Chastang, J. F., Schmaus, A., Niedhammer, I., Stansfeld, S. A., et al. (2002). Socioeconomic position, health, and possible explanations: a tale of two cohorts. American Journal of Public Health, 92(8), 1290–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freitas, A. L., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action. Psychological Science, 13(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Higgins, E. T. (2000). Does personality provide unique explanations for behaviour? Personality as cross-person variability in general principles. European Journal of Personality, 14, 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: promotion pride vs. prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Higgins, E. T., Idson, L. C., Freitas, A. L., Spiegel, S., & Molden, D. C. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1140–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Higgins, E. T., & Scholer, A. A. (2009). Engaging the consumer: the science and art of the value creation process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 100–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Higgins, E. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(4), 209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hong, J., & Lee, A. (2008). Be fit and be strong: Mastering self-regulation through regulatory fit. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(5), 682–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones, L. W., Sinclair, R. C., & Courneya, K. S. (2003). The effects of source credibility and message framing on exercise intentions, behaviors, and attitudes: an integration of the elaboration likelihood model and prospect theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(1), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keh, H. T., & Lee, Y. H. (2006). Do reward programs build loyalty for services? The moderating effect of satisfaction on type and timing of rewards. Journal of Retailing, 82(2), 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I. (2002). Earning the right to indulge: effort as a determinant of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards. Journal of Marketing Research, 9, 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krishnamurthy, P., Carter, P., & Blair, E. (2001). Attribute framing and goal framing effects in health decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(2), 382–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, A. Y., & Higgins, E. T. (2008). The persuasive power of regulatory fit. In M. Wanke (Ed.), Social psychology of consumer behavior (pp. 319–333). New York: Psychology.Google Scholar
  32. Leenheer, J., van Heerde, H., Bijmolt, T., & Smidts, A. (2007). Do loyalty programs really enhance behavioral loyalty? An empirical analysis accounting for self-selecting members. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(1), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lewis, M. (2004). The influence of loyalty programs and short-term promotions on customer retention. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Markland, D., & Ingledew, D. K. (1997). The measurement of exercise motives: factorial validity and invariance across gender of a revised exercise motivations inventory. British Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 361–376.Google Scholar
  36. McKee, S. (2007). The problem with loyalty programs. BusinessWeek Online, 16.Google Scholar
  37. Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 500–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morwitz, V. G., Steckel, J. H., & Gupta, A. (2007). When do purchase intentions predict sales? International Journal of Forecasting, 23(3), 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scale development in the social sciences: Issues and applications. Palo Alto: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  41. Pennington, G. L., & Roese, N. J. (2003). Regulatory focus and temporal perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 563–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain– and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: how theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56, S202–S220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spiegel, S., Grant-Pillow, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Taylor, G. A., & Neslin, S. A. (2005). The current and future sales impact of a retail frequency reward program. Journal of Retailing, 81(4), 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Uncles, M. D., Dowling, G. R., & Hammond, K. (2003). Customer loyalty and customer loyalty programs. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20(4), 294–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang, J., & Lee, A. Y. (2006). The role of regulatory focus in preference construction. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yi, Y., & Jeon, H. (2003). Effects of loyalty programs on value perception, program loyalty, and brand loyalty. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmad Daryanto
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ko de Ruyter
    • 2
  • Martin Wetzels
    • 2
  • Paul G. Patterson
    • 3
  1. 1.Newcastle Business SchoolNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Department of Marketing, School of Business and EconomicsMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.School of MarketingUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations