Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of employee behavior on brand personality impressions and brand attitudes

  • Original Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines how consumers update their brand personality impressions and brand attitudes after interacting with one of the brand's employees. Drawing on stereotyping theory, the author develops a framework that proposes that the impact of an employee's behavior depends on how the employee is categorized. When the employee is considered primarily as an exemplar of the brand's workforce, his or her behavior is generalized more strongly to the brand. When, however, the employee is judged as a relatively unique individual (i.e., when the employee is subtyped), the behavior is not transferred to the brand to the full extent. The results of three studies provide converging evidence and show that the degree to which consumers subtype an employee is determined by the amount of information they possess about the employee, the extent to which they depend on the employee, and their motivation to form an accurate impression. The findings have direct implications for marketers interested in understanding how employees affect the brands they represent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All experimental materials for this study and the other studies can be obtained from the author.

References

  • Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 34(August), 347–356. doi:10.2307/3151897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J. L., Fournier, S., & Brasel, A. S. (2004). When good brands do bad. The Journal of Consumer Research, 31(June), 1–16. doi:10.1086/383419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, P. (2004). The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior. The Journal of Consumer Research, 31(June), 87–101. doi:10.1086/383426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahluwalia, R., Burnkrant, R. E., & Rao Unnava, H. (2000). Consumer response to negative publicity: the moderating role of commitment. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 37(May), 203–214. doi:10.1509/jmkr.37.2.203.18734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendapudi, N., & Leone, R. P. (2003). Psychological implications of customer participation in co-production. Journal of Marketing, 67(January), 14–28. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.1.14.18592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L. L. (2000). Cultivating service brand equity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 128–137. doi:10.1177/0092070300281012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L. A. (1997). Customer voluntary performance: customers as partners in service delivery. Journal of Retailing, 73(3), 383–406. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90024-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, M. J. (1990). Evaluating service encounters: the effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, 54(April), 69–82. doi:10.2307/1251871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457–475. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, E. (2005). Views from consumers next in line: the fundamental attribution error in a service setting. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(2), 139–152. doi:10.1177/0092070304268627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M. T., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (2002). Perceived entitativity, stereotype formation, and the interchangeability of group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1076–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(July), 68–81. doi:10.2307/1251817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation from category-based to individuating processes. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 1–74. San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, G. J. (1991). The trouble of thinking: activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 509–517. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandey, A. A., Fisk, G. M., Mattila, A. S., Jansen, K. J., & Sideman, L. A. (2005). Is service with a smile enough? Authenticity of positive displays during service encounters. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 38–55. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp. 2004.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Lamb, R. (1986). The Dictionary of Personality and Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, R. L,. Jr, Ganesan, S., & Klein, N. M. (2003). Service failure and recovery: the impact of relationship factors on customer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 127–145. doi:10.1177/0092070302250898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, J. L., & Darley, J. M. (1991). The effects of interaction goals on person perception. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 236–267. Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, J. L., & Fein, S. (1989). The role of typical diagnosticity in stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 201–211. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johar, G. V., Sengupta, J., & Aaker, J. L. (2005). Two roads to updating brand personality impressions: trait versus evaluative inferencing. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 42(November), 458–469. doi:10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardes, F. R. (1986). Effects of initial product judgments on subsequent memory-based judgments. The Journal of Consumer Research, 13(June), 1–11. doi:10.1086/209043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, O., & Snyder, M. (2003). Stereotypes and behavioral confirmation: from interpersonal to intergroup perspectives. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 153–234. San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z., & Oleson, K. C. (1995). Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: constructing grounds for subtyping deviants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 565–579. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? a goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 522–544. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: a parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103(2), 284–308. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matta, S., & Folkes, V. S. (2005). Inferences about the brand from counterstereotypical service providers. The Journal of Consumer Research, 32(September), 196–206. doi:10.1086/432229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberg, S. L., & Fiske, S. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 431–444. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, L. L., & Arnould, E. J. (1999). Commercial friendships: service provider-client relationships in context. Journal of Marketing, 63(October), 38–56. doi:10.2307/1251973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M., & Lewis, S. (1988). Inferring category attributes from exemplar attributes: geometric shapes and social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(6), 861–872. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruscher, J. B., & Fiske, S. T. (1990). Interpersonal competition can cause individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 832–843. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G. D., & Elliott, A. J. (1998). The self-serving bias in relational context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 378–386. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P., Roman, R. J., Moskowitz, G. B., Chaiken, S., & Bargh, J. A. (1994). Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: the systematic reprocessing of social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 474–489. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, C., Gutchess, A. H., Feinberg, F., & Polk, T. A. (2006). A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of neural dissociations between brand and person judgments. The Journal of Consumer Research, 33(June), 31–40. doi:10.1086/504132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Coull, A., & Rocher, S. J. (1999). Fencing off the deviant: the role of cognitive resources in the maintenance of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 449–462. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article is based on the author's dissertation completed at the University of St. Gallen. The author would like to thank his supervisor Torsten Tomczak for his continued support and encouragement. Furthermore, this article benefitted greatly from the comments of Martin Eisend, Valerie Folkes, Andreas Herrmann, Shashi Matta, Tom Meyvis, and the participants at the 2007 EMAC doctoral colloquium. Finally, the author would like to thank the editor and the four anonymous reviewers for their many helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Wentzel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wentzel, D. The effect of employee behavior on brand personality impressions and brand attitudes. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 37, 359–374 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0140-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0140-6

Keywords

Navigation