Corporate social responsibility: attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust
This study investigates whether consumers’ perceptions of motives influence their evaluation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts. The study reveals the mediating role of consumer trust in CSR evaluation frameworks; managers should monitor consumer trust, which seems to be an important subprocess regulating the effect of consumer attributions on patronage and recommendation intentions. Further, managers may allay the negative effects of profit-motivated giving by doing well on service quality perceptions. On the other hand, appropriately motivated giving continues to positively affect trust regardless of the performance of the firm on service quality provision.
KeywordsCorporate social responsibility Consumer attributions Moderation effects Trust Service quality Mobile services
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Arumi, A. M., Wooden, R., Johnson, J., Farkas, S., Duffet, A., & Amber, O. (2005). The charitable impulse: A public agenda report. http://www.publicagenda.org.
- Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Dabholkar, P. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2002). An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: Moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 184–201.Google Scholar
- Franklin, D. (2008). Just good business: A special report on corporate social responsibility. The Economist, (January), 19.Google Scholar
- Giving USA Foundation (2007). Annual Report on Philanthropy 2006. http://www.aafrc.org/press_releases/gusa.cfm.
- Globe Scan-MRB (2006). Corporate social responsibility in Greece (in Greek). http://www.instofcom.gr/03CSR%202007.pdf.
- Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.Google Scholar
- Helm, A. (2004). Cynics and skeptics: Consumer dispositional trust. Advances in Consumer Research. Association for Consumer Research (U. S.), 31, 345–351.Google Scholar
- Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland: World Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. (1965). From acts to dispositions. In Berkowitz, L. (Eds.), Advances in experimental psychology (pp. 219–266). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Ping, R. A. (2003). Latent variable interactions and quadratics in survey data: A source book for theoretical model testing, 2nd ed. [on-line monograph].Google Scholar
- Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2004). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 5–12.Google Scholar
- Progressive Grocer (2008). Special report: Environmental sustainability: Seeing green. http://www.progressivegrocer.com/progressivegrocer/research-analysis/index.jsp.
- Reuters (2008). Consumers puts ads to greenwashing test. http://www.reuters.com/.
- Zafirovski, M. (2003). Some amendments to social exchange theory: A sociological perspective. Theory & Science, 4(2) Online paper. http://theoryandscience.icaap.org/content/vol004.002/01_zafirovski.html.