Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 617–624 | Cite as

Bias and variability in purchase intention scales

Article

Abstract

Although purchase intention scales are widely used, relatively little is known about bias and variability in the estimated purchase proportions. Psychometric techniques have been developed to correct for such problems, and analytical approaches have shown that most predictive errors can be explained as probabilistic variability. However, there is a lack of systematic empirical work in the area. We address this problem using two meta-analyses of published work. Our results show that purchase intention scales are empirically unbiased. Furthermore, the variability is much less than previously assumed. This finding improves the confidence researchers can have in the use of such scales. Interestingly, purchase probability scales performed even better than purchase intention scales. The greater precision of probability scales suggests that they may be more useful both as direct measures of likely behavior and as dependent variables in consumer behavior research.

Keywords

Stated purchase probability Purchase intention Meta-analysis Juster scale 

References

  1. Armstrong, J. S. (1985). Long range forecasting: From crystal ball to computer. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, J. S., Vicki, G. M., & Kumar, V. (2000). Sales forecasts for existing consumer products and services: Do purchase intentions contribute to accuracy? International Journal of Forecasting, 16(3), 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bemmaor, A. C. (1995). Predicting behavior from intention-to-buy measures: The parametric case. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 176–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bird, M., & Ehrenberg, A. (1966). Intentions-to-buy and claimed brand usage. Operational Research Quarterly, 17(1), 27–46.Google Scholar
  5. Byrnes, J. (1964). An experiment in the measure of consumer intentions to purchase. Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, American Statistical Association. In Juster, Thomas F. (1966). Consumer buying intentions and purchase probability: An experiment in survey design. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 61(September), 658–696.Google Scholar
  6. Chandon, P., Morwitz, V. G., & Reinartz, W. J. (2004). The short- and long-term effects of measuring intent to repurchase. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(December), 566–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandon, P., Morwitz, V. G., & Reinartz, W. J. (2005). Do intentions really predict behavior? Self-generated validity effects in survey research. Journal of Marketing, 69(April), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clawson, J. C. (1971). How useful are 90-day purchase probabilities? Journal of Marketing, 35, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.) (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Day, D., Gan, B., Gendall, P., & Esslemont, D. (1991). Predicting purchase behaviour. Marketing Bulletin, 2, 18–30.Google Scholar
  11. Gabor, A., & Granger, C. (1972). Ownership and acquisition of consumer durables: Report on the Nottingham consumer durables project. European Journal of Marketing, 6(4), 234–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hsiao, C., Sun, B., & Morwitz, V. G. (2002). The role of stated intentions in new product purchase forecasting. Econometric Models in Marketing, 16, 11–28.Google Scholar
  13. Jamieson, L. F., & Bass, F. M. (1989). Adjusting stated intention measures to predict trial purchase of new products: A comparison of models and methods. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 336–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Juster, T. F. (1966). Consumer buying intentions and purchase probability: An experiment in survey design. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 61, 658–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalwani, M. U., & Silk, A. J. (1982). On the reliability and predictive validity of purchase intention measures. Marketing Science, 1(3), 243–286.Google Scholar
  16. Lee, M.-S., Elango, B., & Schnaars, S. P. (1997). The accuracy of the conference board's buying plans index: A comparison of judgmental vs. extrapolation forecasting methods. International Journal of Forecasting, 13(1), 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Manski, C. F. (1990). The use of intentions data to predict behavior: A best-case analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85(412), 934–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marder, E. (1997). The laws of choice: Predicting customer behavior. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  20. McNeil, J. (1974). Federal programs to measure consumer purchase expectations, 1946–1973: A post-mortem. Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morwitz, V. G. (2001). Methods for forecasting from intentions data. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of forecasting: A handbook for researchers and practitioners (pp. 33–56). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  22. Pickering, J. F., & Isherwood, B. C. (1974). Purchase probabilities and consumer durable buying behaviour. Journal of the Market Research Society, 16(3), 203–226.Google Scholar
  23. Wright, M., Sharp, A., & Sharp, B. (2002). Market statistics for the dirichlet model: Using the juster scale to replace panel data. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(1), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Young, M. R., DeSabro, W. S., & Morwitz, V. G. (1998). The stochastic modeling of purchase intentions and behavior. Management Science, 44(2), 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ehrenberg-Bass InstituteUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Department of MarketingMassey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations