Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 284–294 | Cite as

Institutionalization of ethics and its consequences: a survey of marketing professionals

Article

Abstract

Because of increasing ethical problems in business, organizations have tried to control these problems by institutionalizing ethics, such as by creating new ethics positions and formulating codes of ethics. In this study, the authors develop a scale for measuring the institutionalization of ethics in organizations and assess it for dimensionality, reliability and validity. Two separate studies are conducted, both using samples drawn from an American Marketing Association practitioner population. In Study 1, using a sample of 126 marketing practitioners, we performed exploratory factor analysis on 44 institutionalization items resulting in two separate dimensions of the institutionalization of ethics construct: implicit and explicit institutionalization. Using a national sample of 306 marketing practitioners in Study 2, we performed confirmatory factor analysis on these two dimensions and investigated the effects of these dimensions on perceived importance of ethics, job satisfaction, esprit de corps and organizational commitment. Implicit institutionalization had a significant direct affect on all four of these constructs. On the other hand, explicit institutionalization significantly influenced only the perceived importance of ethics.

Keywords

Marketing ethics Institutionalizing ethics Implicit Explicit 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by the University of Mississippi’s Robert Hearin Foundation and Old Dominion University’s College of Business Faculty Research Grant Program. The paper also benefited from the valuable comments of three anonymous JAMS reviewers and the editor.

References

  1. Brenner, S. N. (1992). Ethics programs and their dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 391–399 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. DeLorme, D., Zinkhan, G. M., & French, W. (2001). Ethics and the internet: Issues associated with qualitative research. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(4), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dubinsky, A. J., & Hartley, S. W. (1986). A path-analytic study of a model of salesperson performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 14, 36–46 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dubinsky, A. J., Howell, R. D., Ingram, T. N., & Bellenger, D. (1986). Salesforce socialization. Journal of Marketing, 50, 192–207 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2002). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases (5th ed). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  7. Gellerman, S. W. (1986). Why ‘Good’ Managers make bad ethical decisions. Harvard Business Review, 64, 85–90 (July–August).Google Scholar
  8. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 8, 5–16 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hunt, S. D., Wood, V. R., & Chonko, L. B. (1989). Corporate ethical values and organizational commitment in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 53, 79–90 (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70 (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jose, A., & Thibodeaux, M. S. (1999). Institutionalization of ethics: The perspective of managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 22, 133–143 (November).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. LeClair, D. T., Ferrell, O. C., & Fraedrich, J. (1998). Integrity management: A guide to managing legal and ethical issues in the workplace. Tampa, FL: University of Tampa Press.Google Scholar
  13. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 455–469 (Fall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–855 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Murphy, P. E. (1989). Creating ethical corporate structure. Sloan Management Review, 30, 81–87 (Winter).Google Scholar
  16. Organ, D. W. (1988). A restatement of the satisfaction-performance hypothesis. Journal of Management, 14, 547–557 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (43–72).Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  18. Singhapakdi, A. (1999). Perceived importance of ethics and ethical decisions in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 45, 89–99 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Singhapakdi, A., Kraft, K. L., Vitell, S. J., & Rallapalli, K. C. (1995). The perceived importance of ethics and social responsibility on organizational effectiveness: A survey of marketers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23, 49–56 (Winter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stevens, B. (1994). An analysis of corporate ethical code studies: Where do we go from here? Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 63–69 (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vitell, S. J., & Davis, D. L. (1990). The Relationship Between Ethics and Job Satisfaction: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 489–494 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marketing Area, College of Business & Public AdministrationOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Marketing, School of Business AdministrationUniversity of MississippiUniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations