Advertisement

Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society

, Volume 79, Issue 8, pp 803–808 | Cite as

Combustion characteristics of candles made from hydrogenated soybean oil

  • Karamatollah Rezaei
  • Tong WangEmail author
  • Lawrence A. Johnson
Article

Abstract

Hydrogenated soybean oil, referred to as soywax by candle makers, is a renewable and biodegradable alternative to paraffin wax in candle manufacturing. Soywax was investigated for its tendency to produce soot as well as potentially harmful organic volatiles (acrolein, formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde) during combustion. Beeswax and paraffin candles were used as references. A considerable amount of soot was produced from the combustion of paraffin candles, but little or none was observed from soywax candles. Compared to paraffin candles, soywax candles burned at a significantly slower rate and required less air. Small amounts of formaldehyde were detected and quantified in the fumes of burning paraffin candles. However, formaldehyde, peaks found in the chromatograms of soy- and beeswax candles were similar to or slightly higher than that of the blank. Since soywax candles exhibited burning properties similar to those of beeswax candles, soywax shows promise in candle applications.

Key Words

Candle combustion hydrogenated oil organic volatiles soot soybean oil soywax 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lau, C., H. Fiedler, O. Hutzinger, K.H. Schwind, and J. Hosseinpour, Levels of Selected Organic Compounds in Materials for Candle Production and Human Exposure to Candle Emissions, Chemosphere 34:1623–1630 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fine, P.M., G.R. Cass, and B.R.T. Simoneit, Characterization of Fine Particle Emissions from Burning Church Candles, Environ. Sci. Technol. 33:2352–2362 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vermeire, T., Acrolein, in Environmental Health Criteria 127, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1992, pp. 11–14.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 4th edn., AOCS Press, Champaign, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson, D.C., and E.G. Hammond, A Sensitive Method for the Determination of Carbonyl Compounds, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 48:653–656 (1971).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith, R.A., and I. Drummond, Trace Determination of Carbonyl Compounds in Air by Gas Chromatography of Their 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazones, Analyst 104:875–877 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krause, J.D., Characterization of Scented Candle Emissions and Associated Public Health Risks, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of South Florida, 1999.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spaeth, K.R., Don’t Hold Your Breath: Personal Exposures to Volatile Organic Compounds and Other Toxins in Indoor Air and What’s (not) Being Done About It, Prev. Med. 31:631–637 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AOCS Press 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karamatollah Rezaei
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tong Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Lawrence A. Johnson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Food Science and Human NutritionIowa State UniversityAmes
  2. 2.Center for Crops Utilization ResearchIowa State UniversityAmes

Personalised recommendations