, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 107–108 | Cite as

Is It Time to Standardize Ethics Guiding the Peer Review Process?

Letter to the Editor


While most scientific journals have well defined ethics requirements for authors, very few journals explicitly specify the ethics standards that govern the actions of editors, editorial board members, and reviewers. We believe it is time to create a standardized policy for all medical and scientific journals that guides the ethical conduct of all stakeholders in the peer review process.


Ethics Conflict of interest Peer review 


  1. 1.
    James MJ, Cook-Johnson RJ, Cleland LG (2007) Selective COX-2 inhibitors, eicosanoid synthesis and clinical outcomes: a case study of system failure. Lipids 42:779–785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Institutes of Health Ethics Program, Principles of Ethical Conduct for Government Officers and Employees (Accessed: 5 October, 2007)
  3. 3.
    Cooper RJ, Gupta M, Wilkes MS, Hoffman JR (2005) Conflict of interest disclosure policies and practices of peer-reviewed biomedical journals. J Gen Intern Med 21:1248–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ethics of Peer Review: a guide for manuscript reviewers (Accessed: 5 October, 2007)
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication (Accessed: 5 October, 2007)

Copyright information

© AOCS 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brain Physiology and Metabolism SectionNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations