Journal of Surfactants and Detergents

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 13–17 | Cite as

The Synergism Effect Between Sodium Dodecylbenzene Sulfonate and a Block Copolymer in Aqueous Solution

Original Article


The synergistic behavior of sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS) with poly(ethylene oxide)–poly(propylene oxide)–poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO–PPO–PEO) block copolymer was studied using surface tension measurements. The surface tension of single and mixed solutions of SDBS and the block copolymer in this study was measured at different concentrations and at 25 °C. The critical micelle concentration (CMC) of these solutions was determined from the surface tension measurements. The SDBS gives higher CMC values than those of the block copolymer. The results show that the CMC value of SDBS decreases as the molar ratio of SDBS increases in the mixture solution with the block copolymer. The surface parameters of adsorption and micellization for single and mixed solutions were investigated. The results show that the surface and micellization properties of SDBS were improved as a result of mixing with the block copolymer. The mole fractions in the micelles and interaction parameters of the mixed solutions were calculated. The foam stability of single and mixed solutions at 25 °C was determined. The results show that the SDBS has more foam stability than the block copolymer and the foam stability increases as the molar ratio of SDBS increase in mixed solution of it with block copolymer.


SDBS Copolymer Synergism Surface and thermodynamic Micellization Adsorption Foam stability 


  1. 1.
    Alexandridis P, Hatton TA (1995) Colloids Surf A 96:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Robb ID (1981) In anionic surfactants—physical chemistry of surfactant action. In: Lucassen-Reynders EH (ed) Surfactant science series 11. Marcel Decker, New York, p 255Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goddard ED (1986) Colloids Surf 19:255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saito S (1989) In non-ionic surfactants: physical chemistry. In: Schick MJ (ed) Surfactant science series 23. Marcel Decker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hayakawa K, Kwak JCT (1991) In cationic surfactants: physical: physical chemistry. In: Rubingh DN, Holland PM (eds) Surfactant science series 37. Marcel Decker, New York, p 189Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lindman B, Thalberg K (1993) In interactions of surfactants with polymers and proteins. In: Goddard ED, Ananthapadmanabhan KP (eds) CRC, Boca Raton, p 203Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Olofsson G, Wang G (1998) In polymer—surfactant systems. Kwak JCT (ed) Surfactant science series 77. Marcel Decker, New York, p 317Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghoreishi SM, Fox GA, Bloor DM, Holzwarth JF, Wyn-Jones E (1999) Langmuir 15:5474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Almgren M, van Stam J, Lindblad C, Li P, Stilbs P, Bahadur P (1991) J Phys Chem 95:5677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Azzam EMS (2001) J Surf Deterg 4(3):293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jonsson B, Lindman B, Holmberg K, Kronberg B (1998) Surfactants and polymers in aqueous solution. Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 IUD, England, p 325Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Takasawa Y, Hueno M, Meguro K (1980) J Colloid Interface Sci 78:207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosen MJ (1978) Surfactants and interfacial phenomena. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carrion FJ, Diaz RR (1999) Tenside Surf Deterg 36(94):238Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosen MJ, Hua XY (1982) J Colliod Interface Sci 86:164CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AOCS 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Surfactants Laboratory, Petrochemicals DepartmentEgyptian Petroleum Research InstituteCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations