Production Engineering

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 253–263 | Cite as

Computation of thermo-elastic deformations on machine tools a study of numerical methods

  • Andreas Naumann
  • Norman Lang
  • Marian Partzsch
  • Michael Beitelschmidt
  • Peter Benner
  • Axel Voigt
  • Jörg Wensch
Computer Aided Engineering

Abstract

Modern machine tools are highly optimized with respect to their design and the production processes they are capable to. Now for further advances, especially a detailed knowledge about the thermo-elastic behavior is needed, because the nowadays still existing deficits are mainly related to this. That is why, endeavors in improvement, like the optimization of the design, the evaluation of new materials and the regulation of the production process, particularly rely on accurate computed thermal deformations. One possible approach to increase their quality is to also include the relevant structural variabilities of the machine tools as well as the resulting interactions between the coupled parts within the calculations. In this article, three different numerical methods are presented, which include structural motions in thermo-elastic analyses. Thereby, several conflicting criteria, like real-time capability, memory saving issues and accuracy are fulfilled each time in a different manner. Those methods are afterwards compared with respect to their runtime and accuracy. Finally, the paper concludes with a classification of the usability of the methods in real-time control and optimization tasks.

Keywords

Thermo-elasticity Structural variability Finite element analysis Long time integration Model order reduction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the German Research Foundation for funding this work within the CRC/TR 96 and ZIH for the provided computing resources. We further thank Alexander Galant for providing the example used here.

References

  1. 1.
    Antoulas AC (2005) Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems. SIAM Publications, PhiladelphiaCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baur U, Beattie CA, Benner P, Gugercin S (2011) Interpolatory projection methods for parameterized model reduction. SIAM J Sci Comput 33(5):2489–2518MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calvo M, Chartier P, Murua A, Sanz-Serna J (2011) Numerical stroboscopic averaging for odes and daes. Appl Numer Math 61(10):1077–1095. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2011.06.007 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weinan E, Engquist B (2003) The heterognous multiscale methods. Commun Math Sci 1(1):87–132MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Freitas F, Rommes J, Martins N (2008) Gramian-based reduction method applied to large sparse power system descriptor models. IEEE Trans Power Syst 23(3):1258–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Großmann K, Städel C, Galant A, Mühl A (2012) Werkzeugmaschinen-Berechnung von Temperaturfeldern an Werkzeugmaschinen. Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 107(6):452–456Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerisch A, Naumann A, Wensch J (2015) Defect corrected averaging for highly oscillatory problems. Appl Math Comput 261(0):90–103MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gugercin S, Antoulas AC, Beattie C (2008) \({\cal H}_2\) model reduction for large-scale dynamical systems. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 30(2):609–638MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haasdonk B, Ohlberger M (2009) Efficient reduced models for parametrized dynamical systems by offline/online decomposition. In: Proceedings of MATHMOD 2009, 6th Vienna international conference on mathematical modellingGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hüeber S, Wohlmuth B (2009) Thermo-mechanical contact problems on non-matching meshes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:1338–1350CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jungnickel G (2010) Simulation des thermischen Verhaltens von Werkzeugmaschinen/Modellierung und Parametrierung. Inst. für Werkzeugmaschinen und Steuerungstechnik, Lehrstuhl für Werkzeugmaschinen, Inst. für Werkzeugmaschinen und Steuerungstechnik, Lehrstuhl für Werkzeugmaschinen, DresdenGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lang N, Saak J, Benner P (2014) Model order reduction for systems with moving loads. at-Automatisierungstechnik 62(7):512–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nestmann S (2006) Mittel und Methoden zur Verbesserung des thermischen Verhaltens von Werkzeugmaschinen. In: Reinhart G, Zäh M (eds) IWB Seminarberichte, vol 83. Herbert Utz VerlagGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Partzsch M, Beitelschmidt M (2015) Simulation of pose- and process-dependent machine tool models. In: Großmann K (ed) Thermo-energetic design of machine tools, chap. 6, pp 61–68. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-12625-8_6
  15. 15.
    Saad Y, Schultz MH (1986) Gmres: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 7(3):856–869MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Strehmel K, Weiner R, Podhaisky H (2012) Numerik gewöhnlicher Differentialgleichungen/nichtsteife, steife und differential-algebraische Gleichungen, 2., überarb. und erw. aufl. edn. Springer Spektrum, Springer SpektrumGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Verwer J, Spee E, Blom J, Hundsdorfer W (1999) A second-order Rosenbrock method applied to photochemical dispersion problems. SIAM J Sci Comput 20(4):1456–1480. doi: 10.1137/S1064827597326651 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Witkowski T, Ling S, Praetorius S, Voigt A (2015) Software concepts and numerical algorithms for a scalable adaptive parallel finite element method. Advances in computational mathematics, pp 1–33. doi: 10.1007/s10444-015-9405-4

Copyright information

© German Academic Society for Production Engineering (WGP) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Solid MechanicsTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of MathematicsTechnische Universität ChemnitzChemnitzGermany
  3. 3.Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical SystemsMagdeburgGermany
  4. 4.Institute for Scientific ComputingTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations