Investigations of ductile damage during the process chains of toothed functional components manufactured by sheet-bulk metal forming
- 453 Downloads
Sheet-bulk metal forming processes combine conventional sheet forming processes with bulk forming of sheet semi-finished parts. In these processes the sheets undergo complex forming histories. Due to in- and out-of-plane material flow and large accumulated plastic strains, the conventional failure prediction methods for sheet metal forming such as forming limit curve fall short. As a remedy, damage models can be applied to model damage evolution during those processes. In this study, damage evolution during the production of two different toothed components from DC04 steel is investigated. In both setups, a deep drawn cup is upset to form a circumferential gearing. However, the two final products have different dimensions and forming histories. Due to combined deep drawing and upsetting processes, the material flow on the cup walls is three-dimensional and non-proportional. In this study, the numerical and experimental investigations for those parts are presented and compared. Damage evolution in the process chains is simulated with a Lemaitre damage criterion. Microstructural analysis by scanning electron microscopy is performed in the regions with high mechanical loading. It is observed that the evolution of voids in terms of void volume fraction is strongly dependent on the deformation path. The comparison of simulation results with microstructural data shows that the void volume fraction decreases in the upsetting stage after an initial increase in the drawing stage. Moreover, the concurrent numerical and microstructural analysis provides evidence that the void volume fraction decreases during compression in sheet-bulk metal forming.
KeywordsSheet-bulk metal forming Lemaitre damage model FE simulation
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the scope of the Transregional Collaborative Research Centre on sheet-bulk metal forming (SFB/TR 73) in the subprojects A1 “Process combination for manufacturing of teethed, thin-walled functional components out of tailored blanks”, A7 “Improvement of combined cutting and deep drawing processes by means of overlaying dynamic process forces”, C4 “Analysis of load history dependent evolution of damage and microstructure for the numerical design of sheet-bulk metal forming processes”.
- 1.Merklein M, Tekkaya AE, Brosius A, Opel S, Koch J (2011) Overview on sheet-bulk metal forming processes. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on technology of plasticity, pp 1109–1114Google Scholar
- 4.Hosford WF, Caddell RM (1993) Metal forming—mechanics and metallurgy, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
- 6.Oyachi Y, Allwood JM (2011) Characterizing the class of local metal sheet thickening processes, steel research international, special edition. 10th International conference on technology of plasticity, ICTP 2011, pp 1025–1030Google Scholar
- 10.Ladevèze P, Lemaitre J (1984) Damage effective stress in quasi-unilateral condition. IUTAM Congress, LyngbyGoogle Scholar
- 14.Schneider T, Vierzigmann U, Merklein M (2014) Analysis of varying properties of semi-finished products in sheet-bulk metal forming of functional components. In: Yoon JW, Stoughton TB, Rolfe B, Beynon JH, Hodgson P (Hrsg.): NUMISHEET 2014: The 9th international conference and workshop on numerical simulation of 3D sheet metal forming processes, pp 930–933Google Scholar
- 16.Behrens BA, Bouguecha A, Vucetic M, Hübner S, Rosenbusch D, Koch S (2015) Numerical and experimental investigations of multistage sheet-bulk metal forming process with compound press tools. In: ESAFORM 2015—key engineering materials (Hrsg.): 18th international ESAFORM conference on material forming, vol 651, pp 1153–1158Google Scholar
- 18.Lemaitre J, Desmorat R (2005) Engineering damage Mechanics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar