Production Engineering

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 513–519 | Cite as

In situ determination of internal stresses in mixed ceramic cutting tools during friction testing using synchrotron radiation

  • C. EichenseerEmail author
  • C. Hartig
  • N. Schell
  • W. Hintze


In order to get a better understanding of wear mechanisms in cutting tool materials, the internal stress states caused by complex external thermo-mechanical loads during cutting processes should be investigated. This can be done using in situ X-ray diffraction with high energy synchrotron radiation. For this reason, in first model tests, the strain state in ceramic cutting tool materials (Al2O3–Ti(O,C)) for hard turning applications is determined during friction testing. An experimental set-up is presented which allows the measurement of lattice strain tensor components in the major phases of the mixed ceramic material under a two-dimensional loading condition during friction. Results show that during friction almost no lattice strains in lateral direction can be measured due to strain compensation. In contrast, in normal direction, lattice strains increase due to the addition of strains. Stress tensor components are calculated from lattice strains and show higher internal stress states for Ti(O,C) than for Al2O3 due to a higher Young’s modulus of Ti(O,C). The set-up represents a major step forward towards future in situ characterization of internal stress states in cutting tool materials exposed to complex thermo-mechanical loading conditions during cutting processes.


Mixed ceramics In situ measurement Synchrotron radiation Cutting tool Friction testing Stress–strain measurement 



The authors gratefully acknowledge Gühring KG for financial support.


  1. 1.
    Obikawa T, Matsumura T, Shirakashi T, Usui E (1997) Wear characteristics of alumina coated and alumina ceramic tools. J Mater Process Technol 63:211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar AS, Durai AR, Sornakumar T (2006) Wear behaviour of alumina based ceramic cutting tools on machining steels. Tribol Int 39:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhattacharya AK, Zimmermann K, Schneider GA, Hintze W (2008) Influence of surface modification on the cutting performance of reaction-sintered Al2O3–TiOC ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 91:2982–2986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dureja JS, Gupta VK, Sharma VS, Dogra M (2010) Wear mechanisms of coated mixed-ceramic tools during finish hard turning of hot die steel. J Mech Eng Sci 224:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cakan A (2011) Real-time monitoring of flank wear behavior of ceramic cutting tool in turning hardened steels. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 52:897–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aslantas K, Ucun I, Cicek A (2012) Tool life and wear mechanism of coated and uncoated Al2O3/TiCN mixed ceramic tools in turning hardened alloy steel. Wear 274–275:442–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh D, Rao PV (2010) Flank wear prediction of ceramic tools in hard turning. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 50:479–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bonnet C, Valiorgue F, Rech J, Claudin C, Hamdi H, Bergheau JM, Gilles P (2008) Identification of a friction model—application to the context of dry cutting of AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel with a TiN coated carbide tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:1211–1223Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Olsson M, Söderberg S, Jacobson S, Hogmark S (1989) Simulation of cutting tool wear by a modified pin-on-disc test. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 29:377–390Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhou JM, Andersson M, Stahl JE (1997) Cutting tool fracture prediction and strength evaluation by stress identification, part I: stress model. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 17:1691–1714Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buryta D, Sowerby R, Yellowley I (1994) Stress distribution on the rake face during orthogonal machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 5:721–739Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kurt A (2009) Modelling of the cutting tool stresses in machining of Inconel 718 using artificial neural networks. Exp Syst Appl 36:9645–9657Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hedenqvist P, Jacobson S, Hogmark S (1997) Tribological laboratory evaluation of thin hard coatings. Surf Coat Technol 97:656–660Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grzesik W, Zalisz Z, Nieslony P (2002) Friction and wear testing of multilayer coatings on carbide substrates for dry machining applications. Surf Coat Technol 155:37–45Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zemzemi F, Bensalem W, Rech J, Dogui A, Kapsa P (2008) New tribometer designed for the characterization of the friction properties at the tool/chip/workpiece interfaces in machining. Tribotest 14:11–25Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bartolomé JF, Aza AH, Martín A, Pastor JY, Llorca J, Torrecillas R, Bruno G (2007) Alumina/zirconia micro/nanocomposites: a new material for biomedical applications with superior sliding wear resistance. J Am Ceram Soc 90:3177–3184Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Waikar RA, Guo YB (2007) Residual stress evolution and mechanical state of hard machined components in sliding contact. Tribol Trans 50:531–539Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miller MP, Bernier JV, Park JS, Kazimirow A (2005) Experimental measurement of lattice strain pole figures using synchrotron X rays. Rev Sci Instrum 76:113903–113911Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van Swygenhoven H, Schmitt B, Berlet PM, Van Petegem S, Cervellino A, Budrovic Z, Brandstetter S, Bollhalder A, Schild M (2006) Following peak profiles during elastic and plastic deformation: a synchrotron-based technique. Rev Sci Instrum 77:013902–013910Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matsumoto K, Shobu T, Akiniwa Y, Yagi T, Yamamoto M (2008) Strain measurement under loading in laser weld on austenitic stainless steel using high-energy synchrotron radiation. J Soc Mater Sci Jpn 57:654–659Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Geandier G, Thiaudière D, Randriamazaoro RN, Chiron R, Djaziri S, Lamongie B, Diot Y, Le Bourhis E, Renault PO, Goudeau P, Bouaffad A, Castelnau O, Faurie D, Hild F (2010) Development of a synchrotron biaxial tensile device for in situ characterization of thin films mechanical response. Rev Sci Instrum 81:103903–103908Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schuren JC, Miller MP, Kazimirov A (2012) A mechanical testing capability for measuring the microscale deformation behavior of structural materials. Exp Mech 52:461–479Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van Swygenhofen H, Van Petegem S (2013) In-situ mechanical testing during X-ray diffraction. Mater Charact 78:47–59Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eeckhout SG, Gorges B, Barthe L, Pelosi O, Safonova O, Giuli G (2008) A high-temperature furnace for in situ synchrotron X-ray spectroscopy under controlled atmospheric conditions. J Synchrotron Rad 15:489–494Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scharma H, Wattjes AC, Amirthalingam M, Zuidwijk T, Geerlofs N, Offerman SE (2009) Multipurpose furnace for in situ studies of polycrystalline material using synchrotron radiation. Rev Sci Instrum 80:123301–123307Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vignolo M, Romano G, Bellingeri E, Martinelli A, Nardelli D, Bitchkov A, Bernini C, Malagoli A, Braccini V, Ferdeghini C (2001) In situ high-energy synchrotron X-ray diffraction investigation of a phase formation and sintering in MgB2 tapes. Supercond Sci Technol 24:065014–065017Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Riello P, Lausi A, Macleod J, Plaisier JR, Zerauschek G, Fornasiero P (2013) In situ reaction furnace for real-time XRD studies. J Synchrotron Rad 20:194–196Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oswald BB, Schuren JC, Pagan DC, Miller MP (2013) An experimental system for high temperature X ray diffraction studies with in situ mechanical loading. Rev Sci Instrum 84:033902–033912Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Uhlmann E, Gerstenberger R, Herter S, Hoghé T, Reimers W, Camin B, Martins RV, Schreyer A, Fischer T (2010) In-situ strain measurement in the chip formation zone during orthogonal cutting. Prod Eng Res Dev 5:1–8Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Uhlmann E, Henze S, Gerstenberger R, Brömmelhoff K, Reimers W, Fischer T, Schell N (2013) An extended shear angle model derived from in situ strain measurements during orthogonal cutting. Prod Eng Res Dev 7:401–408Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eichenseer C, Wittmann I, Hartig C, Schneider GA, Schell N, Hintze W (2013) In situ measurement of lattice strains in mixed ceramic cutting tools under thermal and mechanical loads using synchrotron radiation. Prod Eng Res Dev 7:283–289Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zimmermann K, Schneider GA, Bhattacharya AK, Hintze W (2007) Surface modification of Al2O3/TiC cutting ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 90:3773–3778Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schell N, Martins RV, Beckmann F, Ruhnau H-U, Kiehn R, Schreyer A (2008) The high energy material science beamline at PETRA III. Mat Sci Forum 571–572:261–266Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    He BB (2009) Two-dimensional X-ray diffraction. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wojdyr M (2010) Fityk: a general-purpose peak fitting program. J Appl Cryst 43:1126–1128Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rohrbach C, Ahrensdorf K (1989) Handbuch für experimentelle Spannungsanalyse. VDI, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Eigenmann B (1992) Röntgenographische Analyse inhomogener Spannungszustände in Keramiken, Keramik-Metall-Fügeverbindungen und dünnen Schichten. Dissertation, University of KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shackelford JF, Alexander W (2001) CRC materials science and engineering handbook. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ciftci YO, Ünlü Y, Colakoglu K, Deligoz E (2009) The structural, thermodynamical and elastic properties of TiO. Phys Scr 80:025601–025606Google Scholar

Copyright information

© German Academic Society for Production Engineering (WGP) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Eichenseer
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. Hartig
    • 2
  • N. Schell
    • 3
  • W. Hintze
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Production Management and TechnologyHamburg University of TechnologyHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Materials Physics and TechnologyHamburg University of TechnologyHamburgGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Materials ResearchHelmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht - Center for Materials- and Coastal ResearchGeesthachtGermany

Personalised recommendations