Advertisement

Production Engineering

, Volume 8, Issue 1–2, pp 91–99 | Cite as

Temperature-dependent anisotropic material modeling of the sheet metal component within the polymer injection forming process

  • Bernd-Arno Behrens
  • Tobias GötzeEmail author
Computer Aided Engineering

Abstract

In the course of this work, an extended material model for a carbon steel sheet metal has been developed based on Hill’48 yield criterion, considering temperature-dependent plastic anisotropy coefficients. This material model is applied on a polymer injection forming process in which the sheet metal heats up to a critical forming temperature through the contact with the plastic melt. At this temperature range blue brittleness occurs. The elastic properties, the yield stress as well as the plastic anisotropy coefficients of the sheet material become significantly different compared to those at room temperature. It should be emphasized that especially temperature-dependent anisotropy coefficients are not yet considered in most common material models. With the help of the presented modelling approach a more precise modelling of the temperature-dependent carbon steel material behavior can be realised.

Keywords

Material modeling Anisotropy FEA Polymer injection forming 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for the financial support of project TP4 in the research training group 1378 Manufacture, machining and qualification of hybrid material systems.

References

  1. 1.
    Stauber R (2007) Kunststoffe im Automobilbau—Technische Lösungen und Trends, ATZ—Automobiltechnische Zeitschrift, pp 202–209Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corus Technology Bv, NL (2003) Method and device for producing a composite product and composite product produced there with, Patent WO2003/057446Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banabic D (2010) Sheet metal forming processes constitutive modeling and numerical simulation. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johannaber F, Michaeli W (2002) Handbuch spritzgieen. Carl Hanser, München WienGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vingaard M, Endelt B, Christiansen J (2007) Implementation of a material model with shear rate and temperature dependent viscosity, 6th European LS-DYNA User’s conference, vol 5, pp 213–222Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reinartz H, Mäsing R, Hirt G (2010) Hochdruckblechumformung durch Kunststoffhinterspritzen, vol 25. Aachener Stahlkolloquium, pp 165–174Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baesso R, Luchetta G (2007) Fluid structure interaction analysis in manufacturing metal/polymer macro-composites, NUMIFORM07, 908, pp 729–734Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baesso R (2008) Numerical and experimental investigation of the polymer injection forming process, Ph.D. thesis, University of PadovaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hussain MM, Trompeter M, Witulski J, Tekkaya AE (2012) An experimental and numerical investigation on polymer melt injected sheet metal forming. J Manuf Sci Eng 134(3)031005:1–13. doi: 10.1115/1.4006117 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hussain MM (2013) Polymer injection sheet metal forming experiments and modeling, Ph.D. thesis, TU DortmundGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Doege E, Behrens B-A (2010) Handbuch Umformtechnik—Grundlagen, Technologien, Maschinen. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© German Academic Society for Production Engineering (WGP) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Forming Technology and Machines (IFUM)Leibniz Universität HannoverHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations