Advertisement

Production Engineering

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 71–78 | Cite as

Surface reconstruction for incremental forming

  • A. Erman Tekkaya
  • Ravi Shankar
  • Gerd SebastianiEmail author
  • Werner Homberg
  • Matthias Kleiner
Computer Aided Engineering

Abstract

In spite of extensive efforts being made with regard to virtual process optimization technology, the production of prototype parts is still a necessity. With respect to the production of sheet metal parts in low quantities, incremental sheet metal forming (ISMF) is a highly interesting process. ISMF allows the production of complex parts with drastically reduced costs in tooling and machinery compared to conventional processes like deep drawing. However, ISMF, with it’s incremental nature, introduces the need for generating a tool path considering both final geometry and process-induced deviations or constraints. Consequently, for the generation of the tool path a (tool path) surface, with an adequate offset, is necessary. That is why, within the scope of extensive research work at the Institute of Forming Technology and Lightweight Construction (IUL), a special correction module has been developed, determining this offset e.g. depending on the workpiece geometry. This paper presents the algorithm, the application, and the effect on the produced parts. Furthermore, a concept for an extension regarding further constraints like elastic workpiece behavior is presented.

Keywords

Computer aided engineering Kinematic incremental sheet metal forming (KISMF) Software development 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This project was kindly supported by the DFG within the priority programme SPP 1146.

References

  1. 1.
    Iseki H, Kato K, Sakamoto S (1992) Flexible and incremental sheet matal bulging using a path-controlled spherical roller. Trans Jsme Ser C 58(554):3147–3155Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Junk S (2003) Inkrementelle Blechumformung mit CNC-Werkzeug-maschinen, Verfahrensgrenzen und Umformstrategien. Dissertation, Universität des Saarlandes, SaarbrückenGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Young D, Jeswiet J (2004) Wall thickness variations in single-point incremental forming. J Eng Manuf 218(B11):1453–1459Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hirt G, Ames J, Bambach M, Kopp R (2004) Forming strategies and process modelling for CNC incremental sheet forming. Ann CIRP 53(1):203–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shankar R, Jadhav S, Göbel R, Homberg W, Kleiner M (2005) Incremental sheet metal forming of Preformed sheets. In: 8th ICTP, Verona, pp 347–348Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jadhav S (2004) Basic investigations of the incremental sheet metal forming process on a CNC milling machine. Dissertation, Universität Dortmund, DortmundGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wong C, Dean T, Lin J (2003) A review of spinning, shear forming and flow forming processes. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 43:1419–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matsubara S (2001) A computer numerically controlled dieless incremental forming of a sheet metal. Proc Inst Mech Eng 215:959–966Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jie L, Jianhua M, Shuhuai H (2004) Sheet metal dieless forming and its tool path generation based on STL files. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23:696–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. N (2000) STL file format, version 1. Company paper of GOM mbH, Braunschweig Google Scholar

Copyright information

© German Academic Society for Production Engineering (WGP) 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Erman Tekkaya
    • 1
  • Ravi Shankar
    • 1
  • Gerd Sebastiani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Werner Homberg
    • 1
  • Matthias Kleiner
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Umformtechnik und LeichtbauUniversität DortmundDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations