Ventilation rate and successful recovery from cardiac arrest: illusory correlation bias or real effect?

  • Tiziana Bove
  • Daniele OrsoEmail author
  • Luigi Vetrugno


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.


  1. 1.
    Sanson G, Ristagno G, Caggegi GD et al (2019) Impact of 'synchronous' and 'asynchronous' CPR modality on quality bundles and outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Intern Emerg Med. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhan L, Yang LJ, Huang Y, He Q, Liu GJ (2017) Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD010134.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kurz MC, Prince DK, Christenson J, ROC Investigators et al (2016) Association of advanced airway device with chest compression fraction during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation 98:35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kilgannon JH, Kirchhoff M, Pierce L et al (2017) Association between chest compression rates and clinical outcomes following in hospital cardiac arrest at an academic tertiary hospital. Resuscitation 110:154–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nichol G, Leroux B, Wang H, ROC Investigators et al (2015) Trial of continuous or interrupted chest compressions during CPR. N Engl J Med 373(23):2203–2214CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Medicina Interna (SIMI) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Division, Department of MedicineASUIUD University Hospital of UdineUdineItaly

Personalised recommendations