Internal and Emergency Medicine

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 65–70 | Cite as

Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of pleural and lung ultrasound in discriminating cardiogenic causes of acute dyspnea in the Emergency Department

  • Gian Alfonso Cibinel
  • Giovanna Casoli
  • Fabrizio Elia
  • Monica Padoan
  • Emanuele Pivetta
  • Enrico Lupia
  • Alberto Goffi


Dyspnea is a common symptom in patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED), and discriminating between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic dyspnea is often a clinical dilemma. The initial diagnostic work-up may be inaccurate in defining the etiology and the underlying pathophysiology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of pleural and lung ultrasound (PLUS), performed by emergency physicians at the time of a patient’s initial evaluation in the ED, in identifying cardiac causes of acute dyspnea. Between February and July 2007, 56 patients presenting to the ED with acute dyspnea were prospectively enrolled in this study. In all patients, PLUS was performed by emergency physicians with the purpose of identifying the presence of diffuse alveolar-interstitial syndrome (AIS) or pleural effusion. All scans were later reviewed by two other emergency physicians, expert in PLUS and blinded to clinical parameters, who were the ultimate judges of positivity for diffuse AIS and pleural effusion. A random set of 80 recorded scannings were also reviewed by two inexperienced observers to assess inter-observer variability. The entire medical record was independently reviewed by two expert physicians (an emergency medicine physician and a cardiologist) blinded to the ultrasound (US) results, in order to determine whether, for each patient, dyspnea was due to heart failure, or not. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values were obtained; likelihood ratio (LR) test was used. Cohen’s kappa was used to assess inter-observer agreement. The presence of diffuse AIS was highly predictive for cardiogenic dyspnea (sensitivity 93.6%, specificity 84%, positive predictive value 87.9%, negative predictive value 91.3%). On the contrary, US detection of pleural effusion was not helpful in the differential diagnosis (sensitivity 83.9%, specificity 52%, positive predictive value 68.4%, negative predictive value 72.2%). Finally, the coexistence of diffuse AIS and pleural effusion is less accurate than diffuse AIS alone for cardiogenic dyspnea (sensitivity 81.5%, specificity 82.8%, positive predictive value 81.5%, negative predictive value 82.8%). The positive LR was 5.8 for AIS [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.8–7.1] and 1.7 (95% CI 1.2–2.6) for pleural effusion, negative LR resulted 0.1 (95% CI 0.0–0.4) for AIS and 0.3 (95% CI 0.1–0.8) for pleural effusion. Agreement between experienced and inexperienced operators was 92.2% (p < 0.01) and 95% (p < 0.01) for diagnosis of AIS and pleural effusion, respectively. In early evaluation of patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea, PLUS, performed with the purpose of identifying diffuse AIS, may represent an accurate and reproducible bedside tool in discriminating between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic dyspnea. On the contrary, US detection of pleural effusions does not allow reliable discrimination between different causes of acute dyspnea in unselected ED patients.


Dyspnea Ultrasonography Diagnosis 


  1. 1.
    Wang CS, FitzGerald JM, Schulzer M et al (2005) Does this dyspneic patient in the emergency department have congestive heart failure? JAMA 294:1944–1956PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Collins SP, Lindsell CJ, Storrow AB et al (2006) Prevalence of negative chest radiography results in the emergency department patient with decompensated heart failure. Ann Emerg Med 47:13–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCullough PA, Nowak RM, McCord J et al (2002) B-type natriuretic peptide and clinical judgment in emergency diagnosis of heart failure: analysis from Breathing Not Properly (BNP) Multinational Study. Circulation 106:416–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ray P, Birolleau S, Lefort Y et al (2006) Acute respiratory failure in the elderly: etiology, emergency diagnosis, prognosis. Critical care 10:R82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lichtenstein D, Mezière G (1998) A lung ultrasound sign allowing bedside distinction between pulmonary edema and COPD: the comet-tail artifact. Intensive Care Med 24:1331–1334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Volpicelli G, Mussa A, Garofalo G et al (2006) Bedside lung ultrasound in the assessment of alveolar-interstitial syndrome. Am J Emerg Med 24:689–696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM (1999) Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 10:37–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knudsen CW, Omland T, Clopton P et al (2004) Diagnostic value of B-Type natriuretic peptide and chest radiographic findings in patients with acute dyspnea. Am J Med 116:363–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liteplo AS, Marill KA, Villen T et al (2009) Emergency thoracic ultrasound in the differentiation of the etiology of shortness of breath (ETUDES): sonographic B-lines and N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide in diagnosing congestive heart failure. Acad Emerg Med 16:201–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lichtenstein DA (2007) Ultrasound in the management of thoracic disease. Crit Care Med 35:S250–S261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Noble VE, Murray AF, Capp R et al (2009) Ultrasound assessment for extravascular lung water in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Time course for resolution. Chest 135:1433–1439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soldati G, Gargani L, Silva FR (2008) Acute heart failure: new diagnostic perspectives for the emergency physician. Intern Emerg Med 3:37–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kataoka H, Takada S (2000) The role of thoracic ultrasonography for evaluation of patients with decompensated chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1638–1646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Copetti R, Soldati G, Copetti P (2008) Chest sonography: a useful tool to differentiate acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema from acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 6:16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reissig A, Kroegel C (2003) Transthoracic sonography of diffuse parenchymal lung disease: the role of comet tail artifacts. J Ultrasound Med 22:173–180PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SIMI 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gian Alfonso Cibinel
    • 1
  • Giovanna Casoli
    • 2
  • Fabrizio Elia
    • 3
  • Monica Padoan
    • 1
  • Emanuele Pivetta
    • 1
  • Enrico Lupia
    • 4
  • Alberto Goffi
    • 1
  1. 1.Emergency Medicine UnitASL TO3TurinItaly
  2. 2.Emergency Medicine UnitASL TO1 - Ospedale MartiniTurinItaly
  3. 3.Emergency Medicine UnitASL TO2 - Ospedale Giovanni BoscoTurinItaly
  4. 4.Department of Clinical PathophysiologyUniversity of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations